CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07072546Updated Jan 27, 2026

Chitosan and i-PRF in Palatal Wound Healing

An interventional study of free gingival graft + gelatin sponge and free gingival graft + chitosan in Free Gingival Graft, Wound Healing and i-PRF, sponsored by Biruni University. Completed at 2 sites in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-27.

Sponsored by Biruni University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
68
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to evaluate the effects of chitosan and injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) on wound healing at the donor site following free gingival graft (FGG) procedures. The palatal donor area often experiences delayed healing and postoperative discomfort, motivating the search for effective biomaterials to enhance recovery and reduce patient morbidity. Although various approaches have been investigated, the combined application of chitosan and i-PRF has not yet been explored in this context.

The study examines three patient groups treated at the periodontology departments of Çukurova and Biruni University: one with gelatin sponge (control), one with chitosan, and one with chitosan infused with i-PRF. Parameters such as pain (VAS), bleeding, burning sensation, dietary changes, epithelialization (PEHI score), and color match were assessed over a 2-month follow-up.

The findings are expected to provide insights into whether i-PRF-enhanced chitosan offers superior healing outcomes and greater patient comfort compared to conventional methods.

02

Conditions studied

  • Free Gingival Graft
  • Wound Healing
  • i-PRF
  • Chitosan
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Biruni University is the lead sponsor of 172 studies on the registry; 43 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Periodontally healthy
  • Having good oral hygiene (plaque accumulation \<20%)
  • Requiring a free gingival graft (FGG) procedure in an area with insufficient keratinized gingiva width (\<2 mm)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having systemic diseases contraindicating surgical procedures,
  • Uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c > 7),
  • Being pregnant or breastfeeding,
  • Autoimmune and/or inflammatory diseases of the oral cavity,
  • Active periodontal disease,
  • Smokers (≥ 10 cigarettes per day)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
68 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    control

    control group

    Procedure: free gingival graft + gelatin sponge

  • Active comparator
    chitosan

    Procedure: free gingival graft + chitosan

  • Experimental
    chitosan-iprf

    Procedure: free gingival graft + chitosan and i-PRF

Interventions

  • Procedurefree gingival graft + gelatin sponge

    Free gingival graft surgery and application of gelatin sponge to the palatal wound

  • Procedurefree gingival graft + chitosan

    free gingival graft surgery and application of chitosan to the palatal wound

  • Procedurefree gingival graft + chitosan and i-PRF

    free gingival graft surgery and application of chitosan and i-PRF to the palatal wound

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Palatal early healing index

    The palatal early healing index (PEHI) measured the following 5 parameters: (1) bleeding on palpation, which was assessed with a damp cotton applicator gently rolled on the wound site; (2) incomplete epithelialization (assessed intraorally by the visual presence or absence of immediate bubble formation after hydrogen peroxide application with sterile gauze on the wound area); (3) presence of redness assessed intraorally; (4) presence of swelling assessed intraorally; and (5) presence of granulation tissue assessed intraorally. Each of the 5 parameters was assessed dichotomously (yes/no).

    Time frame: Day 7

  2. Palatal early healing index

    The palatal early healing index (PEHI) measured the following 5 parameters: (1) bleeding on palpation, which was assessed with a damp cotton applicator gently rolled on the wound site; (2) incomplete epithelialization (assessed intraorally by the visual presence or absence of immediate bubble formation after hydrogen peroxide application with sterile gauze on the wound area); (3) presence of redness assessed intraorally; (4) presence of swelling assessed intraorally; and (5) presence of granulation tissue assessed intraorally. Each of the 5 parameters was assessed dichotomously (yes/no).

    Time frame: Day 14

  3. Palatal early healing index

    The palatal early healing index (PEHI) measured the following 5 parameters: (1) bleeding on palpation, which was assessed with a damp cotton applicator gently rolled on the wound site; (2) incomplete epithelialization (assessed intraorally by the visual presence or absence of immediate bubble formation after hydrogen peroxide application with sterile gauze on the wound area); (3) presence of redness assessed intraorally; (4) presence of swelling assessed intraorally; and (5) presence of granulation tissue assessed intraorally. Each of the 5 parameters was assessed dichotomously (yes/no).

    Time frame: Day 28

  4. Palatal early healing index

    The palatal early healing index (PEHI) measured the following 5 parameters: (1) bleeding on palpation, which was assessed with a damp cotton applicator gently rolled on the wound site; (2) incomplete epithelialization (assessed intraorally by the visual presence or absence of immediate bubble formation after hydrogen peroxide application with sterile gauze on the wound area); (3) presence of redness assessed intraorally; (4) presence of swelling assessed intraorally; and (5) presence of granulation tissue assessed intraorally. Each of the 5 parameters was assessed dichotomously (yes/no).

    Time frame: Day 56

Secondary outcomes

  1. Palatal Pain score

    The degree of pain in the patient's palatal region will be evaluated using visual analogue scale (0-no pain to 10-severe pain).

    Time frame: Day 1

  2. Palatal Pain score

    The degree of pain in the patient's palatal region will be evaluated using visual analogue scale (0-no pain to 10-severe pain).

    Time frame: Day 3

  3. Palatal Pain score

    The degree of pain in the patient's palatal region will be evaluated using visual analogue scale (0-no pain to 10-severe pain).

    Time frame: Day 7

  4. Palatal Pain score

    The degree of pain in the patient's palatal region will be evaluated using visual analogue scale (0-no pain to 10-severe pain).

    Time frame: Day 14

  5. Palatal Pain score

    The degree of pain in the patient's palatal region will be evaluated using visual analogue scale (0-no pain to 10-severe pain).

    Time frame: Day 28

  6. Palatal Pain score

    The degree of pain in the patient's palatal region will be evaluated using visual analogue scale (0-no pain to 10-severe pain).

    Time frame: Day 56

  7. Use of analgesics and palatal bleeding

    Patients will be given a form and asked to record this informations daily.

    Time frame: Day 1

  8. Difficulty in chewing

    The degree of difficulty in chewing in the patient's palatal region will be evaluated using visual analogue scale (0-no to 10-severe).

    Time frame: Day 7

  9. Difficulty in chewing

    The degree of difficulty in chewing in the patient's palatal region will be evaluated using visual analogue scale (0-no to 10-severe).

    Time frame: Day 14

  10. Difficulty in chewing

    The degree of difficulty in chewing in the patient's palatal region will be evaluated using visual analogue scale (0-no to 10-severe).

    Time frame: Day 28

  11. Difficulty in chewing

    The degree of difficulty in chewing in the patient's palatal region will be evaluated using visual analogue scale (0-no to 10-severe).

    Time frame: Day 56

  12. Use of analgesics and palatal bleeding

    Patients will be given a form and asked to record this information daily.

    Time frame: Day 2

  13. Use of analgesics and palatal bleeding

    Patients will be given a form and asked to record this information daily.

    Time frame: Day 3

  14. Use of analgesics and palatal bleeding

    Patients will be given a form and asked to record this information daily.

    Time frame: Day 4

  15. Use of analgesics and palatal bleeding

    Patients will be given a form and asked to record this information daily.

    Time frame: Day 5

  16. Use of analgesics and palatal bleeding

    Patients will be given a form and asked to record this information daily.

    Time frame: Day 6

  17. Use of analgesics and palatal bleeding

    Patients will be given a form and asked to record this information daily.

    Time frame: Day 7

  18. Graft dimentions

    The width, length, and thickness of the palatal graft will be measured using a periodontal probe and recorded.

    Time frame: Day 0

  19. Color match

    The color match at the donor site will be evaluated in comparison with the adjacent palatal area and the contralateral palatal arch by visual analogue scale (0-very bad to 10-excellent).

    Time frame: Day 14

  20. Color match

    The color match at the donor site will be evaluated in comparison with the adjacent palatal area and the contralateral palatal arch by visual analogue scale (0-very bad to 10-excellent).

    Time frame: Day 28

  21. Color match

    The color match at the donor site will be evaluated in comparison with the adjacent palatal area and the contralateral palatal arch by visual analogue scale (0-very bad to 10-excellent).

    Time frame: Day 56

  22. Burning sensation

    The degree of burning sensation in the patient's palatal region will be evaluated using visual analogue scale (0-no to 10-severe).

    Time frame: Day 1

  23. Burning sensation

    The degree of burning sensation in the patient's palatal region will be evaluated using visual analogue scale (0-no to 10-severe).

    Time frame: Day 3

  24. Burning sensation

    The degree of burning sensation in the patient's palatal region will be evaluated using visual analogue scale (0-no to 10-severe).

    Time frame: Day 7

  25. Burning sensation

    The degree of burning sensation in the patient's palatal region will be evaluated using visual analogue scale (0-no to 10-severe).

    Time frame: Day 14

  26. Burning sensation

    The degree of burning sensation in the patient's palatal region will be evaluated using visual analogue scale (0-no to 10-severe).

    Time frame: Day 28

  27. Burning sensation

    The degree of burning sensation in the patient's palatal region will be evaluated using visual analogue scale (0-no to 10-severe).

    Time frame: Day 56

  28. Changes in dietary habits

    The degree of changes in dietary habits in the patient's palatal region will be evaluated using visual analogue scale (0-no to 10-severe).

    Time frame: Day 1

  29. Changes in dietary habits

    The degree of changes in dietary habits in the patient's palatal region will be evaluated using visual analogue scale (0-no to 10-severe).

    Time frame: Day 3

  30. Changes in dietary habits

    The degree of changes in dietary habits in the patient's palatal region will be evaluated using visual analogue scale (0-no to 10-severe).

    Time frame: Day 7

  31. Changes in dietary habits

    The degree of changes in dietary habits in the patient's palatal region will be evaluated using visual analogue scale (0-no to 10-severe).

    Time frame: Day 14

  32. Changes in dietary habits

    The degree of changes in dietary habits in the patient's palatal region will be evaluated using visual analogue scale (0-no to 10-severe).

    Time frame: Day 28

  33. Changes in dietary habits

    The degree of changes in dietary habits in the patient's palatal region will be evaluated using visual analogue scale (0-no to 10-severe).

    Time frame: Day 56

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Cukurova University
    Adana, Turkey (Türkiye)
  • Biruni University
    Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 27, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07072546
Lead sponsor
Biruni University
Collaborators
Cukurova University
Responsible party
Burcu KARADUMAN (Prof., Biruni University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 18, 2025
Start date
Jul 12, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 10, 2025
Completion
Dec 10, 2025
Last update
Jan 27, 2026

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion