An interventional study of Palatal wound will be covered with Ora-aid patch and Palatal wound will be covered with Composite stent in Heal Wound and VAS Will be Used to Assess Pain Postoperative, sponsored by Fatma saad saad mahmoud elsherbini. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 40 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-18.
Sponsored by Fatma saad saad mahmoud elsherbini · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care
All study subjects will sign written informal consent form before enrolment.
They will be divided into four groups, 10 patients each:
This is the only study on the registry with Fatma saad saad mahmoud elsherbini as lead sponsor.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Inclusion Criteria:-
Palatal wound will be left to heal spontaneously
Palatal wound will be covered with Composite stent
Device: Palatal wound will be covered with Composite stent
Palatal wound will be covered with PRF
Combination Product: Palatal wound will be covered with PRF
Palatal wound will be covered with Ora-aid patch
Device: Palatal wound will be covered with Ora-aid patch
Palatal wound will be covered with Ora-aid patch
Also known as: ora aid
Palatal wound will be covered with Composite stent
Palatal wound will be covered with PRF
Also known as: prf
Wound healing assessment
The parameters of tissue color, bleeding response to palpation, presence of granulation tissue, characteristics of the incision margins, and the presence of suppuration were evaluated as this index assesses wound healing using scores from 1 to 5: a wound with very poor healing receives a score of 1, whereas excellent healing gets a score of 5.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
Pain using the visual analogue scale
Patients were asked about their pain levels, swelling, and other experiences related to the surgical techniques and instruments to assess postoperative pain. The perceived discomfort was rated using a VAS, which is marked at two endpoints: "no discomfort" at one end (score of 0) and "unbearable discomfort" at the other end (score of 10). Patients completed the questionnaires on the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 7th, and 14th days after their surgery
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
Patient satisfaction through direct communication
Patient satisfaction (PS) was evaluated using a three-point rating scale: 3 for fully satisfied, 2 for satisfied, and 1 for unsatisfied. Each patient was asked about their satisfaction with the following patient-centered criteria: root coverage achieved, relief from dentinal hypersensitivity, color of the gingiva, shape and contour of the gingiva, surgical procedure (including pain during surgery and discomfort related to the duration of the procedure and the operator's handling), post-surgical phase (including pain, swelling, and any postoperative complications), and cost-effectiveness (patients were asked if they felt the treatment justified the time and money spent). This approach aimed to gather comprehensive feedback on the overall patient experience
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.