ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07070752Updated Jul 22, 2025

Evaluation of Insulin Glulisine (GP40321) Compared to Insulin Glulisine (Apidra® SoloStar®) in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Patients

A Phase 3 interventional study of GP40321 and Apidra® SoloStar® in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitis, sponsored by Geropharm. Completed at 17 sites in Russia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-22.

Sponsored by Geropharm · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 2 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2023, registered Jul 2025).
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
224
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to demonstrate the non-inferior immunogenicity of GP40321 compared to Apidra® SoloStar® at a concentration of 100 U/mL in type 1 diabetes mellitus patients. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • What is the immunogenicity of GP40321 and Apidra® SoloStar®?
  • What are the efficacy and safety of GP40321 and Apidra® SoloStar®?

Researchers will compare the immunogenicity, efficacy and safety parameters of GP40321 and Apidra® SoloStar®.

Participants will:

  • Visit the clinic 9 times: once for screening, 3 times during dose titration (plus 2 telephone contacts) and 5 times during the stable dose treatment period.
02

Conditions studied

  • Type 1 Diabetes Mellitis
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

3,754 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; 600 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 224 is above the median of 40 across 2,820 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 studies →

Lead sponsor

Geropharm is the lead sponsor of 23 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Signed to participate in the study.
  • Male or female sex.
  • Age ≥18 years at the time of providing informed consent.
  • Diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) for ≥12 months prior to the Screening Visit.
  • (BMI) between 18.5-35.0 kg/m² at the Screening Visit.
  • Stable basal-bolus insulin therapy for ≥6 months prior to the Screening Visit, including:

    1. Insulin glargine (100 U/mL)

      IN COMBINATION WITH

    2. Insulin aspart (100 U/mL) OR
    3. Insulin lispro (100 U/mL) OR
    4. Insulin glulisine (100 U/mL)
  • level ≥6.5% and ≤10%, measured at screening.
  • Willingness and ability to comply with study procedures, including the 7-point glycemic profile and self-monitoring of blood glucose, as well as protocol-specified restrictions and prohibitions.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

Related to Insulin Therapy

  • to insulin glulisine or insulin glargine therapy.
  • History of to any component of the product or significant allergic reactions to medications, including any type of insulin.
  • Severe insulin resistance (defined as insulin requirement >1.5 U/kg/day).
  • Change of the INN (International Nonproprietary Name) of bolus or basal insulin within 6 months prior to Screening.
  • Use of biosimilar insulin products within 6 months prior to Screening, except for those from GEROPHARM LLC.
  • Use of insulin pump therapy within 6 months prior to Screening or planned initiation during the study.
  • Use of systemic at supraphysiologic doses for ≥7 days within 3 months prior to Screening.
  • Use of hypoglycemic drugs other than insulin products, including injectable glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (aGLP-1), within 3 months prior to Screening or planned initiation during the study.

Related to T1DM progression and subject health risk

  • History of or screening-identified chronic T1DM complications, including:

    1. Proliferative diabetic retinopathy, which may require intervention during the study period (laser ablation, surgical treatment, injectable drugs, etc.), in the opinion of the Investigator;
    2. Severe diabetic peripheral or autonomic neuropathy, in the opinion of the Investigator;
    3. Chronic kidney disease (including diabetic nephropathy) with an estimated (eGFR) \<30 mL/min/1.73 m²;
    4. Current diabetic foot syndrome that may require intervention during the study period (surgical treatment, wound rehabilitation, limb relief, therapy, antibacterial therapy, etc.).
  • Acute T1DM complications within 3 months prior to Screening or identified during screening, including:

    1. Episode of severe hypoglycemia (which required the help of another person or hospitalization);
    2. Episode of diabetic ketoacidosis;
    3. Episode of hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state.
  • More than 15 episodes of mild hypoglycemia (symptomatic or asymptomatic) within 1 month prior to Screening or identified during screening.

Related to comorbidities and subject health risk

  • Conditions affecting level assessment (e.g., history of hemoglobinopathy or hemolytic anemia, blood transfusion within 3 months prior to Screening); anemia that cannot be corrected before subject enrollment.
  • Significant blood loss within 3 months prior to Screening, including but not limited to:

    1. Blood donation;
    2. Extensive surgery or trauma resulting in significant blood loss.
  • Abnormal results of the following screening laboratory tests:

    1. hemoglobin level \<9.0 g/dL (SI system: \<90 g/L);
    2. hematocrit \<30%;
    3. or AST >2 (ULN) or either ALT or AST >3× ULN;
    4. serum level >2 ULN (excluding subjects with previously diagnosed Gilbert's syndrome).
  • History of or condition identified during screening, including but not limited to:

    1. Unstable angina, myocardial infarction, arrhythmia requiring medical treatment, or congestive heart failure class III or IV according to the (NYHA) classification within 1 year prior to the Screening Visit;
    2. Stroke or within 6 months prior to the Screening Visit.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.

Related to immunogenicity assessment

  • Regular use of immunotropic therapy or any other medications that may affect the patient's immune status.
  • Vaccination within 3 months prior to the anticipated randomization date or planned during the study period.
  • History of diseases other than vitiligo and controlled autoimmune diseases that are part of autoimmune polyglandular syndrome (types 1-3), with the exception of adrenal insufficiency.
  • A burdened allergic history, which, according to the Investigator, may affect the results of the study or endanger the patient's safety.
  • Full recovery from an acute inflammatory illness less than 4 weeks before the Screening Visit.
  • Incomplete recovery from surgery or surgical intervention planned for the period of the patient's participation in the study.
  • Positive serological test results for infections:

    1. (HIV-1/2 antibodies);
    2. (surface antigen);
    3. (antibodies to hepatitis C virus antigens).
  • History or presence of oncological and/or oncohematological diseases not in full 5-year remission at the Screening Visit.
  • History of organ and/or bone marrow transplantation (except for corneal transplantation performed ≥3 months prior to Screening).

Related to risk of protocol non-compliance

  • Planned hospitalization for any reason during the study period.
  • Mental, physical, or other conditions that prevent the subject from adequately assessing their behavior or properly complying with the study protocol, including a history of mental illness.
  • Current or past (within three years prior to the first administration of the investigational product) history of alcohol, drug, medication, and/or substance abuse.
  • Participation in another clinical study within 28 days prior to Screening or planned participation during the current study.
  • Any other conditions that, in the opinion of the Investigator, represent a contraindication for study participation (i.e., may adversely affect the subject's condition if they participate, may interfere with study procedures, or affect the interpretation of study results). In case of doubt, the Investigator should consult the Medical Expert for the study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(20)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant

Neoadjuvant treatment is given before the main treatment (usually surgery), often to shrink a tumour. Adjuvant treatment is given after it, to lower the chance of the cancer coming back.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

TIA (transient ischaemic attack)

A “mini-stroke”: temporary stroke-like symptoms caused by reduced blood flow to part of the brain, spinal cord or eye, without signs of a new stroke on a scan.

Stroke symptoms need emergency care at once, even if they go away.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
224 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    GP40321

    Drug: GP40321 · Drug: RinGlar®

  • Active comparator
    Apidra® SoloStar®

    Drug: Apidra® SoloStar® · Drug: RinGlar®

Interventions

  • GP40321, solution for subcutaneous injection, 100 U/mL (GEROPHARM LLC, Russia)

    Also known as: insulin glulisine

  • Apidra® SoloStar®, solution for subcutaneous injection, 100 U/mL (Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH, Germany)

    Also known as: insulin glulisine

  • Patients also receive long-acting basal insulin therapy (insulin glargine 100 U/mL) throughout the study

    Also known as: insulin glargine

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of patients who develop an immune response

    The proportion of patients who develop an immune response during the study.

    Time frame: From screening to the end of treatment at Week 26

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in mean anti-insulin antibodies (AIA) level

    Change in mean anti-insulin antibodies (AIA) level after 26 weeks compared with baseline at Screening.

    Time frame: From screening to the end of treatment at Week 26

  2. Change in mean neutralizing anti-insulin antibodies (nAIA) level

    Change in mean neutralizing anti-insulin antibodies (nAIA) level after 26 weeks compared with baseline at Screening.

    Time frame: From screening to the end of treatment at Week 26

  3. Incidence of nAIA in nAIA-naïve subjects

    Incidence of nAIA during 26 weeks of insulin therapy in nAIA-naïve subjects.

    Time frame: From screening to the end of treatment at Week 26

  4. Proportion of patients with clinically significant immune response

    Proportion of patients who develop a clinically significant immune response within 26 weeks.

    Time frame: From screening to the end of treatment at Week 26

  5. Change in mean HbA1c level

    Change in mean HbA1c level after 26 weeks compared with baseline at Screening.

    Time frame: From screening to the end of treatment at Week 26

  6. Proportion of patients with HbA1c ≤7.0%

    Proportion of patients with HbA1c ≤7.0% in the absence of nocturnal and severe hypoglycemia after 26 weeks.

    Time frame: From screening to the end of treatment at Week 26

  7. Proportion of patients with reached individual target HbA1c

    Proportion of patients who reach their individual target HbA1c after 26 weeks.

    Time frame: From screening to the end of treatment at Week 26

  8. Change in mean fasting plasma glucose (FPG)

    Change in mean fasting plasma glucose (FPG) after 26 weeks compared with baseline at Screening.

    Time frame: From screening to the end of treatment at Week 26

  9. Change in mean values of the 7-point glycemic profile

    Change in mean values of the 7-point glycemic profile after 22 weeks of stable-dose insulin therapy compared with baseline at Screening.

    Time frame: From screening to the end of treatment at Week 26

  10. Change in mean values of the 7-point glycemic profile

    Change in mean values of the 7-point glycemic profile after 22 weeks of stable-dose insulin therapy compared with the end of the titration period.

    Time frame: From the end of the dose titration period to the end of treatment at Week 26

  11. Change in mean total daily insulin dose

    Change in mean total daily insulin dose after 22 weeks of stable-dose insulin therapy compared with the end of the titration period.

    Time frame: From the end of the dose titration period to the end of treatment at Week 26

  12. Change in mean body weight

    Change in mean body weight at Week 26 compared with baseline at Screening.

    Time frame: From screening to the end of treatment at Week 26

  13. Treatment satisfaction

    Assessment of satisfaction with diabetes mellitus treatment using the DTSQs questionnaire after 26 weeks.

    Time frame: From screening to the end of treatment at Week 26

  14. Assessment of safety

    \- Frequency and severity of adverse events (AE)/serious adverse events (SAE) based on abnormalities in vital signs, ECG readings, and laboratory tests. -Separate assessment of the following AE/SAE: a. the frequency of hypoglycemia; b. the frequency of ketoacidosis; c. the frequency of injection site reactions; d. the frequency of allergic reactions. - Changes in vital signs compared to baseline. - Changes in laboratory test results compared to baseline.

    Time frame: From screening to the end of treatment at Week 26

07

Study locations

17 sites
  • RZD-Medicine Clinical Hospital of Chelyabinsk
    Chelyabinsk, 454091, Russia
  • Interregional Clinical and Diagnostic Center
    Kazan', 420101, Russia
  • Krasnoyarsk State Medical University named after Professor V.F. Voino-Yasenetsky, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
    Krasnoyarsk, 660041, Russia
  • National Medical Research Center of Endocrinology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
    Moscow, 117292, Russia
  • "Endocrinological Dispensary of the Moscow City Health Department"
    Moscow, 119034, Russia
  • Almazov National Medical Research Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
    Saint Petersburg, 194156, Russia
  • X7 Research, LLC
    Saint Petersburg, 194156, Russia
  • City Multidisciplinary Hospital No. 2
    Saint Petersburg, 194354, Russia
  • "City polyclinic No. 117"
    Saint Petersburg, 194358, Russia
  • St. Elizabeth City Hospital of the Holy Martyr
    Saint Petersburg, 195257, Russia
  • "City polyclinic No. 112"
    Saint Petersburg, 195297, Russia
  • "City polyclinic No. 112"
    Saint Petersburg, 195427, Russia
  • "Eco-Safety" Research Center, LLC
    Saint Petersburg, 196143, Russia
  • City Pokrovskaya Hospital
    Saint Petersburg, 199106, Russia
  • "City polyclinic No. 4"
    Saint Petersburg, 199178, Russia
  • "Diabetes Center", LLC
    Samara, 443041, Russia
  • Volgograd Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1
    Volgograd, 400081, Russia
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Drai R, Galstyan G, Karonova T, Protsenko E, Parfenova T, Arefeva A, Matvienko I, Iliushchenko D, Makarenko I. Immunogenicity, efficacy and safety of a biosimilar insulin glulisine compared with originator in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus: A phase III randomised clinical trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2026 Mar;28(3):1791-1799. doi: 10.1111/dom.70360. Epub 2025 Dec 9. PubMed 41366610 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Apr 2023 to primary completion in Nov 2023, 7 months.

Of 78 industry-sponsored phase 3 interventional studies under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, half reached primary completion within 17 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 25. This study's 7 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 106 studies reached it within 18 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 31.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 9, 2025
First posted
Jul 17, 2025
StartActual
Apr 14, 2023
Primary completionActual
Nov 28, 2023
CompletionActual
Nov 28, 2023
Last update
Jul 22, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 22, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07070752
Lead sponsor
Geropharm
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 17, 2025
Start date
Apr 14, 2023
Primary completion
Nov 28, 2023
Completion
Nov 28, 2023
Last update
Jul 22, 2025

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Insulin glulisine

Start the discussion