CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07067554Updated Sep 30, 2025

Breastfeeding Myths and Mothers' Motivation

An observational study in Breastfeeding, Maternal Behavior and Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, sponsored by Acibadem University. Recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-30.

Sponsored by Acibadem University · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2025; still recruiting 1 year later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
191
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Breast milk is a unique and irreplaceable source of nutrition for infants, offering protection against many common childhood diseases due to its natural sterility, accessibility, and immune-boosting antibodies. Exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of life is critical for healthy growth, development, and immune support. Despite global recommendations by WHO and UNICEF, lack of knowledge and inadequate support continue to hinder optimal breastfeeding practices.

One major barrier is the persistence of cultural myths and misconceptions, such as "colostrum should be discarded," or "infants need water after every feeding." These unfounded beliefs may reduce mothers' confidence and lead to early cessation of breastfeeding or premature introduction of complementary foods.

This study aims to examine the relationship between mothers' belief in breastfeeding myths and their motivation to breastfeed. While prior research has explored each factor individually, no known studies have analyzed their interaction.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breastfeeding
  • Maternal Behavior
  • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
  • Motivation
03

In context

Breast Feeding

262 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Feeding; 112 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 191 is close to the median of 177 across 48 observational studies indexed under Breast Feeding.

Browse Breast Feeding studies →

Lead sponsor

Acibadem University is the lead sponsor of 210 studies on the registry; 50 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Mothers aged 18 or older with an infant between 0-6 months, meeting eligibility criteria and providing consent.

Inclusion criteria

  • Having an infant aged 0-6 months
  • Having breastfed the baby at least once
  • Voluntarily agreeing to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having a physical or psychiatric health condition that prevents breastfeeding
  • Having had a multiple (twin or more) pregnancy
  • Exclusively formula-feeding the baby
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
191 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Demographic, Birth, and Breastfeeding Characteristics of Participants

    Collected using a 25-question Descriptive Information Form developed by the researchers. Includes maternal demographics, pregnancy and birth history, infant characteristics, breastfeeding status, beliefs, and motivational factors.

    Time frame: At baseline (one-time assessment at enrollment)

  2. Belief in Breastfeeding Myths

    Measured using the Breastfeeding Myths Scale developed by Yılmaz Sezer et al. (2024). The scale consists of 30 items in a single dimension. Total scores range from 30 to 150, with higher scores indicating a stronger belief in breastfeeding myths. A cut-off score of 119.50 is used to distinguish between low and high levels of myth belief.

    Time frame: At baseline (one-time assessment at enrollment)

  3. Breastfeeding Motivation

    Breastfeeding motivation was measured using the Breastfeeding Motivation Scale, originally developed by Kestler-Peleg et al. (2015) and adapted into Turkish by Mızrak Şahin et al. (2019). The scale consists of 24 items and assesses five subdimensions: Integrated Regulation, Intrinsic Motivation and Identified Regulation, Introjected Regulation - Social Approval, Introjected Regulation - Social Pressure, and External Regulation - Additional Benefits. Each subdimension score is calculated separately based on the mean of relevant items. Scores range from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating higher levels of motivation in the respective subdimension.

    Time frame: At baseline (one-time assessment at enrollment)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Acıbadem University
    Istanbul, Ataşehir, Turkey (Türkiye)
    • Güzin Ünlü Suvari, Ph.D. (C) · Contact · +90
    • Merve Coşkun, Ph.D. · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bulut, M., & Küçük Alemdar, D. (2021). Breastfeeding motivation in mothers of excessive crying infants: A correlation study. Early Child Development and Care, 191(9), 1417-1426. Cohen, J. (1988). Stati
  • Yilmaz Sezer N, Aker MN, Gonenc IM, Topuz S. Development of the Breastfeeding Myths Scale. Breastfeed Med. 2024 Jan;19(1):40-46. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2023.0200. PubMed 38241130 ↗
  • Mizrak Sahin B, Ozerdogan N, Ozdamar K, Gursoy E. Factors affecting breastfeeding motivation in primiparious mothers: An application of breastfeeding motivation scale based on self-determination theory. Health Care Women Int. 2019 Jun;40(6):637-652. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2018.1526289. Epub 2019 May 29. PubMed 31140955 ↗
  • Kestler-Peleg M, Shamir-Dardikman M, Hermoni D, Ginzburg K. Breastfeeding motivation and Self-Determination Theory. Soc Sci Med. 2015 Nov;144:19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.09.006. Epub 2015 Sep 8. PubMed 26372935 ↗
  • Chipojola R, Chiu HY, Huda MH, Lin YM, Kuo SY. Effectiveness of theory-based educational interventions on breastfeeding self-efficacy and exclusive breastfeeding: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Sep;109:103675. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103675. Epub 2020 Jun 6. PubMed 32585447 ↗
  • Eram, U. (2017). A review article: Myths, beliefs and malpractices relating to breastfeeding and complementary feeding practices. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Science Invention, 6(6), 14-16.
  • Yildirim Goksen DF, Ozkan S. The effect of online breastfeeding education on breastfeeding motivation: A randomized controlled study. J Pediatr Nurs. 2024 Mar-Apr;75:e42-e48. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2023.12.026. Epub 2024 Jan 5. PubMed 38182483 ↗
  • Koura, H. (2019). Myths about breastfeeding. Al-Azhar Assiut Medical Journal, 17(2), 109-113. https://doi.org/10.4103/AZMJ.AZMJ_47_19
  • Maleki A, Faghihzadeh E, Youseflu S. The Effect of Educational Intervention on Improvement of Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2021 Aug 10;2021:5522229. doi: 10.1155/2021/5522229. eCollection 2021. PubMed 34422058 ↗
  • Marques ES, Cotta RM, Priore SE. [Myths and beliefs surrounding breastfeeding]. Cien Saude Colet. 2011 May;16(5):2461-8. doi: 10.1590/s1413-81232011000500015. Portuguese. PubMed 21655719 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data (IPD) will not be publicly shared due to privacy concerns and the sensitive nature of maternal and infant health information. However, anonymized data may be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author after publication of the study results.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 30, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07067554
Lead sponsor
Acibadem University
Responsible party
Güzin Ünlü Suvari (Principle Investigator, M.Sc. Lecturer, Acibadem University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 16, 2025
Start date
Sep 9, 2025
Primary completion
Jul 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 30, 2025

Study contacts

Güzin Ünlü Suvari
Contact
guzin.unlu@acibadem.edu.tr
+902165004429

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion