CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07060716Updated Nov 19, 2025

Validation of Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA (Dd-cfDNA) for Kidney Transplant Monitoring

An observational study in Kidney Transplant Rejection and Cell-free DNA, sponsored by Insight Molecular Diagnostics. Recruiting at 10 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-11-19.

Sponsored by Insight Molecular Diagnostics · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Nov 2025, 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Sep 2025; still recruiting 1 year 1 month later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
125
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this observational study is to learn if the donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) test can assess rejection in kidney transplant recipients. Participants will have blood and urine collected at their study visit.

Researchers will compare results of the GraftAssureDx to rejection detected by standard-of-care graft biopsies.

02

Conditions studied

  • Kidney Transplant Rejection
  • Cell-free DNA
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Insight Molecular Diagnostics is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Individuals who have received a kidney transplant at centers in the United States and Germany will be invited to participate.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Subject is 18 years of age or older
  2. At least 12 calendar days have elapsed since the subject received a kidney transplant.
  3. Subject has provided legally effective informed consent
  4. Subject agrees to comply with all study procedures

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Kidney donor is an identical twin of the subject.
  2. The subject has another previously transplanted organ in situ.
  3. Subject has received a hematopoietic stem cell transplant.
  4. Subject has received a bone marrow graft.
  5. Subject has self-reported as pregnant.
  6. In the opinion of the investigator, the subject's participation in the study would pose a risk to data integrity or to the subject's safety and welfare.

Sample Inclusion Criteria:

1. A graft biopsy is obtained within ±1 week of blood draw.

  • If blood draw is obtained after biopsy, blood draw should be taken at least 2 days after an uncomplicated biopsy procedure.

Sample Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Sample collected from someone that had an invasive graft biopsy ≤ 48 hours prior to blood draw.
  2. Sample collected from subject that received immunosuppressive treatment for biopsy-proven acute rejection ≤ 30 days prior to blood draw
  3. Sample collected from subject that received a blood transfusion ≤ 30 days prior to blood draw.
  4. Sample collected from a subject that provided another sample for the study within the past 7 days.
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
125 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testdonor-derived cell-free DNA test

    A donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) test used to measure the concentration of total cell-free DNA and the fractional abundance of the dd-cfDNA.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinical validation of the dd-cfDNA test when compared to biopsy-confirmed rejection

    Relative percentage of dd-cfDNA levels of 0.5% and absolute values of 50cp/mL are considered to be the diagnostic cutoff for rejection, which will be refined during the first study phase.

    Time frame: Samples tested after final assay cutoffs have been established will be analyzed to demonstrate clinical performance of the investigational assay. This testing will occur from enrollment to 18 weeks after acquisition of the samples.

  2. Clinical validation of the dd-cfDNA test when compared to biopsy-confirmed rejection

    Clinical sensitivity of the dd-cfDNA test shall be better or equal to published values (≥56%). Current literature shows an average sensitivity of 69% with a SD of 13%. Therefore, 56% represents the lower boundary (average - 1SD) of the distribution of published values.

    Time frame: Samples tested after the final assay cutoffs have been established will be analyzed to demonstrate clinical performance of the investigational assay. This testing will occur from enrollment to 24 weeks after acquisition of the samples.

  3. Clinical validation of the dd-cfDNA test when compared to biopsy-confirmed rejection

    Clinical Specificity of the dd-cfDNA test shall be better or equal to published values (≥75%). Current literature shows an average specificity of 81% with a SD of 6%. Therefore, 75% represents the lower boundary (average - 1SD) of the distribution of published values.

    Time frame: Samples tested after the assay final cutoffs have been established will be analyzed to demonstrate clinical performance of the investigational assay. This testing will occur from enrollment to 24 weeks after acquisition of the samples.

  4. Clinical validation of the dd-cfDNA test when compared to biopsy-confirmed rejection

    Predictive values are mathematically derived from sensitivity and specificity using the Bayes' theorem. Therefore, success criteria are defined as the lower boundary of the current literature at any given a priori probability. E.g., for an a priori probability of 20%, the lower boundary for NPV is 85%.

    Time frame: Samples tested after the final assay cutoffs have been established will be analyzed to demonstrate clinical performance of the investigational assay. This testing will occur from enrollment to 24 weeks after acquisition of the samples.

  5. Clinical validation of the dd-cfDNA test when compared to biopsy-confirmed rejection

    Predictive values are mathematically derived from sensitivity and specificity using the Bayes' theorem. Therefore, success criteria are defined as the lower boundary of the current literature at any given a priori probability. E.g., for an a priori probability of 20%, the lower boundary for Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is 49%.

    Time frame: Samples tested after the final assay cutoffs have been established will be analyzed to demonstrate clinical performance of the investigational assay. This testing will occur from enrollment to 24 weeks after acquisition of the samples.

Secondary outcomes

  1. ROC-AUC of dd-cfDNA vs. biopsy-confirmed rejection.

    The second endpoint is for investigational use only and therefore has no predefined success criteria.

    Time frame: This testing will occur from assay cutoff up to 24 weeks after acquisition of the samples.

  2. Correlation between GraftAssureDx results and traditional biomarkers of kidney rejection (creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate, blood urea nitrogen).

    The second endpoint is for investigational use only and therefore has no predefined success criteria.

    Time frame: This testing will occur from assay cutoff up to 24 weeks after acquisition of the samples.

07

Study locations

6 of 10 sites recruiting
  • University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine
    Los Angeles, California 90033, United States
    Active, not recruiting
  • Mayo Clinic in Florida
    Jacksonville, Florida 32224, United States
    • Carla Palmucci · Contact · Palmucci.Carla@mayo.edu · 904-953-3182
    • Mohamed Elrefaei, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Tampa General Hospital
    Tampa, Florida 33606, United States
    Recruiting
  • Cleveland Clinic
    Cleveland, Ohio 44195, United States
    • Jennifer Seaman-Czerr · Contact · Czerrj@ccf.org · 216-990-0436
    • Ziad Zaky, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
    Active, not recruiting
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center
    Nashville, Tennessee 37232, United States
    Recruiting
  • Baylor, Scott & White Research Institute
    Dallas, Texas 75246, United States
    Recruiting
  • Intermountain Health
    Murray, Utah 84107, United States
    Recruiting
  • Institute of Immunology - Transplantation Immunology
    Heidelberg, Baden-Wurttemberg 69120, Germany
    Active, not recruiting
  • Charite Universitatsmedizin
    Berlin, 10117, Germany
    Active, not recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — only IPD used in the results publication

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 19, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07060716
Lead sponsor
Insight Molecular Diagnostics
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 11, 2025
Start date
Sep 8, 2025
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 19, 2025

Study contacts

Robert Rogers, M.S.
Contact
rrogers@imdxinc.com
14436258427
Ekkehard Schuetz, MD, PhD
Contact
eschuetz@imdxinc.com
615-927-1528
Ekkehard Schuetz, MD, PhD
study chair · Insight Molecular Diagnostics

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion