CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07057908Updated Sep 5, 2025

Comparison of Intubation Using Video Laryngeal Mask and Video Laryngoscope in Elective Surgical Patients

An observational study in Airway Management, Tracheal Intubation and Elective Surgeries, sponsored by Samsun University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-05.

Sponsored by Samsun University · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Feb 2026, 8 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
176
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study compares two airway devices that are commonly used during elective surgery: the video laryngeal mask airway (VLM) and the video laryngoscope (VLS). Both are part of routine anesthesia practice. Our main focus is to measure how long intubation takes with each device and to see how successful the intubation is. The study does not involve any extra procedures or risks; everything will be carried out as part of normal patient care.

Read the detailed description

In this prospective observational study, we will compare two airway devices commonly used during elective surgeries: the video laryngeal mask airway (SaCoVLM) and the video laryngoscope. The study will involve adult patients (18 years and older, ASA physical status I-III) scheduled to undergo surgery under general anesthesia at Samsun University Training and Research Hospital.

Patients will be assigned to one of two groups. In one group, intubation will be performed using a video laryngoscope; in the other group, a video laryngeal mask will be used. In both groups, tracheal intubation will be carried out with the assistance of a bougie after device placement.

The primary outcome of the study will be intubation time, defined as the duration from insertion of the device until successful confirmation of tracheal intubation. Secondary outcomes will include ease of insertion, the need for additional maneuvers, and complications such as desaturation, trauma, or failed attempts.

Since both techniques, as well as bougie use, are already part of routine anesthesia practice, no extra interventions or risks will be introduced. The aim of the study is to compare the performance of these two devices under everyday clinical conditions.

02

Conditions studied

  • Airway Management
  • Tracheal Intubation
  • Elective Surgeries
  • Videolaryngoscopy
  • Anaesthesia

Keywords

  • Video Laryngoscope
  • Video Laryngeal Mask Airway
  • SaCoVLM
  • Intubation Success Rate
  • Observational Study
  • Elective Surgical Patients
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Samsun University is the lead sponsor of 81 studies on the registry; 21 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult patients aged 18 years and older, classified as ASA I to III, who are scheduled to undergo elective surgical procedures under general anesthesia. All participants will require tracheal intubation using either a video laryngoscope or a video laryngeal mask airway (SaCoVLM), both with bougie assistance.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients aged 18 years and older
  • Patients scheduled for elective surgical procedures
  • Patients classified as ASA Physical Status I-III
  • Patients undergoing general anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients younger than 18 years
  • Patients undergoing emergency surgery
  • Patients with difficult airway predictors, such as:

Mallampati score ≥ 3

Thyromental distance \< 6 cm

Mouth opening \< 3 cm

  • Patients with anatomical abnormalities or surgical history involving the oropharynx, larynx, or airway
  • Patients with conditions contraindicating head or neck manipulation (e.g., cervical instability, upper airway tumors)

Pregnant patients

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
176 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Video Laryngoscope

    Tracheal intubation using a video laryngoscope assisted with a bougie in adult patients undergoing elective surgery.

    Procedure: Video Laryngeal Mask Airway (SaCoVLM) Intubation with Bougie

  • Video Laryngeal Mask Airway (SaCoVLM)

    Tracheal intubation performed through a video laryngeal mask airway (SaCoVLM) with bougie assistance in adult patients undergoing elective surgery.

    Procedure: Video Laryngoscope Intubation with Bougie

Interventions

  • ProcedureVideo Laryngoscope Intubation with Bougie

    Participants in this group will undergo tracheal intubation using a video laryngoscope under general anesthesia. After induction, a standard bougie will be advanced through the vocal cords under video guidance, and the endotracheal tube will be railroaded over the bougie into the trachea. The primary outcome will be intubation time, measured from insertion of the device until confirmation of successful tracheal intubation. Additional parameters such as intubation success rate, ease of insertion, and complications (e.g., desaturation, airway trauma, failed attempts) will also be recorded. No extra procedures will be performed beyond routine airway management.

  • ProcedureVideo Laryngeal Mask Airway (SaCoVLM) Intubation with Bougie

    Participants in this group will undergo tracheal intubation using a video laryngeal mask airway (SaCoVLM) under general anesthesia. After successful placement of the device, a standard bougie will be inserted through the SaCoVLM's dedicated lumen, and an endotracheal tube will be advanced over the bougie into the trachea under video guidance. The primary outcome will be intubation time, defined as the duration from device insertion to confirmation of successful intubation. Secondary outcomes include intubation success rate, ease of insertion, and complications such as desaturation, trauma, or failed attempts. As both techniques are part of routine practice, no additional risks will be introduced.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to Successful Intubation

    The time from when the endotracheal tube passes the upper incisors to the appearance of three consecutive end-tidal CO₂ (ETCO₂) waveforms on the capnograph. This will be used as the objective marker of successful tracheal intubation. Timing will be recorded in seconds by an independent observer using a stopwatch.

    Time frame: Intraoperative (from tube passing the upper incisors to the third ETCO₂ waveform)

Secondary outcomes

  1. First-Attempt Intubation Success Rate

    Defined as successful tracheal intubation on the first attempt, confirmed by visualization of three consecutive ETCO₂ waveforms and bilateral chest expansion. The outcome will be recorded as a binary variable: Yes = Successful on first attempt No = Failed or required multiple attempts

    Time frame: Immediately after intubation

  2. Insertion-Related Complications

    Complications related to the airway device or bougie use, including desaturation (SpO₂ \< 92%), oropharyngeal trauma (visible bleeding), or need for additional maneuvers.

    Time frame: Intraoperative and early postoperative period (0-30 minutes)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Samsun University, Samsun Training and Research Hospital
    Samsun, Ilkadim 55000, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Sargin M, Uluer MS. Comparison of McGrath((R)) Series 5 video laryngoscope with Macintosh laryngoscope: A prospective, randomised trial in patients with normal airways. Pak J Med Sci. 2016 Jul-Aug;32(4):869-74. doi: 10.12669/pjms.324.10037. PubMed 27648030 ↗
  • Levitan RM, Ochroch EA, Kush S, Shofer FS, Hollander JE. Assessment of airway visualization: validation of the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) scale. Acad Emerg Med. 1998 Sep;5(9):919-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1998.tb02823.x. PubMed 9754506 ↗
  • Sun Y, Huang L, Xu L, Zhang M, Guo Y, Wang Y. The Application of a SaCoVLMTM Visual Intubation Laryngeal Mask for the Management of Difficult Airways in Morbidly Obese Patients: Case Report. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Nov 18;8:763103. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.763103. eCollection 2021. PubMed 34869469 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 5, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07057908
Lead sponsor
Samsun University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 10, 2025
Start date
Sep 1, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Feb 2, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 5, 2025

Study contacts

Mehmet Göhan Taflan
Contact
drmehmettaflan@gmail.com
+90 535 211 40 70
Ahmet Ozan Aydın
Contact
ahmetozanaydin@gmail.com
+90 543 895 61 46
Hatice S Kuşderci
study director · Samsun University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion