CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07057700Updated Jul 10, 2025

Investigating the Mechanisms of Welwalk Robot in Restoring Motor Function of the Lower Extremities in Stroke Patients

An interventional study of welwalk training and physical therapy in Stroke and Walking Impairment, sponsored by Ruijin Hospital. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 20 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-10.

Sponsored by Ruijin Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
38
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Current evidence and clinical applications of robotic gait training devices for motor function recovery post-stroke are increasingly available. Although existing research demonstrates that robotic gait training can improve patients' gait and balance, there remains a lack of in-depth investigation into its specific mechanisms of action concerning central nervous system (CNS) reorganization - notably, changes in activity within the motor cortex and associated neural networks. The intrinsic changes within the CNS have received insufficient attention, limiting a comprehensive and profound understanding of the rehabilitation outcomes. Therefore, this study aims to elucidate the potential mechanisms underlying robotic gait training-induced neuroplasticity by integrating functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) technology with multi-dimensional lower limb motor function assessment tools (such as FAC, BBS, AMEDA, 10MWT, 6MWT, TUGT). It will systematically investigate the effects of robotic gait training on both the central nervous system and lower limb motor function in stroke patients. Furthermore, the study will compare the differences in functional recovery efficacy between robotic gait training and conventional rehabilitation therapies.

Read the detailed description

In this study, participants will be randomly allocated into two groups: the Welwalk training group and the conventional rehabilitation therapy group.

Welwalk Training Group: Each session will consist of 30 minutes of Welwalk robot-assisted training, followed by 15 minutes of gait training and 15 minutes of supplementary exercises.Control Group (Conventional Rehabilitation Therapy): Each session will consist of 45 minutes of gait training and 15 minutes of supplementary exercises.The intervention period will span 3 weeks, with sessions administered six times per week. Each session will last 1 hour.

Clinical assessments will be conducted by certified healthcare professionals at four time points: at baseline (prior to the commencement of formal training), and after the 1st week, 2nd week, and 3rd week of treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke
  • Walking Impairment

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • stroke
  • Lower limb dysfunction
  • robotics
  • gait
03

In context

Stroke

7,283 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,013 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 38 is below the median of 50 across 5,366 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Ruijin Hospital is the lead sponsor of 635 studies on the registry; 359 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients or family gave written informed consents to participate in this study.
  • Patients with first hemiplegia caused by primary supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage or cerebral infarction.
  • Within 1 year of stroke onset
  • Aged ≥ 20
  • Body weight is between 40 and 80 kg
  • No excessive spasticity in hip, knee, and ankle joints (Modified Ashworth Scale \<3)
  • sufficient cognition to follow simple instructions and to understand the content and purpose of the study (Chinese version-MOCA ≥ 20 points)
  • Patients who have risks of giving-way when they walk with Ankle-Foot orthosis (AFO)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A history of myocardial infarction
  • Muscular or neurological disorder including diabetic neuropathy
  • Symptomatic angina or arrhythmia
  • Symptomatic respiratory disorder
  • Communicable infection
  • Joint contracture or limb deformity that affects walking (Range of motion of hip extension \< 5 degree, knee extension \< -5 degree (can be flexible), ankle dorsiflexion with knee extension position \< 5 degree)
  • Heterotropic ossification that restrict the range of motion of joints of lower extremities
  • Being vulnerable to fracture like severe osteoporosis of spine or lower extremities
  • Incontinence of urine or feces that may deface the robotic knee-ankle-foot device of Welwalk
  • Inadequate control of hypertension (resting systolic blood pressure ≥ 180 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 120 mmHg)
  • Inadequate control of tachycardia (heart rate at rest ≥ 120 bpm)
  • Training restriction due to reduced cardiac function or respiratory dysfunction
  • Visual or auditory impairment hindering training
  • Pregnant patients
  • Recent participation in other clinical trials
  • Patient whom examination doctor judge improper as a trial subject
  • Anyone not able to sustain the training protocol with Welwork or regular training
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
38 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    welwalk training

    Daily physiotherapy training using the welwalk lower limb walking training robot

    Device: welwalk training

  • Active comparator
    conventional physical therapy

    Daily training using traditional physiotherapy such as core training, gait training, etc.

    Other: physical therapy

Interventions

  • Devicewelwalk training

    welwalk training group 30 min of welwalk robot-assisted training + 15 min of walking training + 15 min of other training per session.The intervention lasted a total of 3 weeks, 6 sessions/week, 1 hour/session.

  • Otherphysical therapy

    45 min of walking training + 15 min of other training per session. The intervention lasted a total of 3 weeks, 6 sessions/week, 1 hour/session.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The Functional Ambulation Categories (FAC)

    FAC is a functional walking test that evaluates ambulation ability. This 6-point scale assesses ambulation status by determining how much human support the patient requires when walking, regardless of whether or not they use a personal assistive device.The FAC uses a six-point scale from 0 to 5, where a higher score indicates better performance.

    Time frame: Before intervention (Week 0); After the First week of intervention (Week 1); After the Second week of intervention (Week 2); After the Third week of intervention (Week 3);

Secondary outcomes

  1. functional near - infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)

    Using fNIRS technology to observe brain activation and brain network changes during the walking period in participants.

    Time frame: Before intervention (Week 0); After the First week of intervention (Week 1); After the Second week of intervention (Week 2); After the Third week of intervention (Week 3)

  2. 10 Meter Walk Test(10WMT)

    assessing the participants' walking ability. Less time spent by patients indicates better walking ability.

    Time frame: Before intervention (Week 0); After the First week of intervention (Week 1); After the Second week of intervention (Week 2); After the Third week of intervention (Week 3)

  3. Timed Up and Go Test (TUGT)

    Assessment of motor function of the unaffeected and affected steering sides

    Time frame: Before intervention (Week 0); After the First week of intervention (Week 1); After the Second week of intervention (Week 2); After the Third week of intervention (Week 3)

  4. 6minute walking test(6MWT)

    Assessment of cardiorespiratory endurance in participants

    Time frame: Before intervention (Week 0); After the First week of intervention (Week 1); After the Second week of intervention (Week 2); After the Third week of intervention (Week 3)

  5. Berg Balance Scale (BBS)

    Assessment of the participant's ability to balance. The BBS is scored on a scale of 0 to 56; higher scores reflect better balance function.

    Time frame: Before intervention (Week 0); After the First week of intervention (Week 1); After the Second week of intervention (Week 2); After the Third week of intervention (Week 3)

  6. Modified Barthel Index,MBI

    Assessment of the subject's ability to perform daily living tasks.The MBI is scored on a scale of 0 to 100; higher scores reflect better ADL.

    Time frame: Before intervention (Week 0); After the First week of intervention (Week 1); After the Second week of intervention (Week 2); After the Third week of intervention (Week 3)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Shanghai Ruijin Hospital, affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of medicine,
    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality 200025, China
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Zhang B, Li D, Liu Y, Wang J, Xiao Q. Virtual reality for limb motor function, balance, gait, cognition and daily function of stroke patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2021 Aug;77(8):3255-3273. doi: 10.1111/jan.14800. Epub 2021 Mar 6. PubMed 33675076 ↗
  • Wang C, Zhang Q, Hou S, Guo D, Han X, Huo W, Zhang Y. Split-belt treadmill training improves gait symmetry and lower limb function in patients with stroke. Sci Rep. 2025 May 8;15(1):16123. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-98322-3. PubMed 40341197 ↗
  • Sheng Y, Han J. Biomechanical characteristics and neuromuscular action control mechanism of single-dual-task walking-conversion training in stroke patients. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2025 May;38(3):576-592. doi: 10.1177/10538127241308215. Epub 2025 Feb 12. PubMed 39973293 ↗
  • Caliandro P, Molteni F, Simbolotti C, Guanziroli E, Iacovelli C, Reale G, Giovannini S, Padua L. Exoskeleton-assisted gait in chronic stroke: An EMG and functional near-infrared spectroscopy study of muscle activation patterns and prefrontal cortex activity. Clin Neurophysiol. 2020 Aug;131(8):1775-1781. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.04.158. Epub 2020 May 18. PubMed 32506008 ↗
  • Li X, Zhang H, Zhang W, Wu J, Dai L, Long N, Jin T, Gu L, Chen J. Neural mechanisms underlying the improvement of gait disturbances in stroke patients through robot-assisted gait training based on QEEG and fNIRS: a randomized controlled study. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025 Jun 18;22(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12984-025-01656-2. PubMed 40533805 ↗
  • Belda-Lois JM, Mena-del Horno S, Bermejo-Bosch I, Moreno JC, Pons JL, Farina D, Iosa M, Molinari M, Tamburella F, Ramos A, Caria A, Solis-Escalante T, Brunner C, Rea M. Rehabilitation of gait after stroke: a review towards a top-down approach. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2011 Dec 13;8:66. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-8-66. PubMed 22165907 ↗
  • Fan T, Zheng P, Zhang X, Gong Z, Shi Y, Wei M, Zhou J, He L, Li S, Zeng Q, Lu P, Zhao Y, Zou J, Chen R, Peng Z, Xu C, Cao P, Huang G. Effects of exoskeleton rehabilitation robot training on neuroplasticity and lower limb motor function in patients with stroke. BMC Neurol. 2025 May 3;25(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s12883-025-04203-7. PubMed 40319228 ↗
  • Chen S, Zhang W, Wang D, Chen Z. How robot-assisted gait training affects gait ability, balance and kinematic parameters after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2024 Jun;60(3):400-411. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08354-0. Epub 2024 Apr 22. PubMed 38647534 ↗
  • Hao QH, Qiu MM, Wang J, Tu Y, Lv ZH, Zhu TM. The effect of lower limb rehabilitation robot on lower limb -motor function in stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 26;14(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s13643-025-02759-6. PubMed 40140968 ↗
  • Zhang S, Fan L, Ye J, Chen G, Fu C, Leng Y. An Intelligent Rehabilitation Assessment Method for Stroke Patients Based on Lower Limb Exoskeleton Robot. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2023;31:3106-3117. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2023.3298670. Epub 2023 Aug 2. PubMed 37490379 ↗
  • Hesse S, Mehrholz J, Werner C. Robot-assisted upper and lower limb rehabilitation after stroke: walking and arm/hand function. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2008 May;105(18):330-6. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2008.0330. Epub 2008 May 2. PubMed 19629252 ↗
  • Xu S, Zhu S, Li M, Zhang T, Wang Q, Sui Y, Shen Y, Chaojie K, Zhuang R, Guo C, Wang T, Zhu L. Altered cortical activation patterns in post-stroke patients during walking with two-channel functional electrical stimulation: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy observational study. Front Neurol. 2025 Jan 13;15:1449667. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1449667. eCollection 2024. PubMed 39871991 ↗
  • Rodriguez-Fernandez A, Lobo-Prat J, Font-Llagunes JM. Systematic review on wearable lower-limb exoskeletons for gait training in neuromuscular impairments. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021 Feb 1;18(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00815-5. PubMed 33526065 ↗
  • Scrivener K, Dorsch S, McCluskey A, Schurr K, Graham PL, Cao Z, Shepherd R, Tyson S. Bobath therapy is inferior to task-specific training and not superior to other interventions in improving lower limb activities after stroke: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2020 Oct;66(4):225-235. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2020.09.008. Epub 2020 Oct 14. PubMed 33069609 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — We will share the demographic information and baseline clinical data of all participants.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Analytic code

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 10, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07057700
Lead sponsor
Ruijin Hospital
Responsible party
Qing Xie, PhD (Professor, Ruijin Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 10, 2025
Start date
Jul 1, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 10, 2025

Study contacts

Ming Kang, master of science
Contact
km04514@rjh.com.cn
+8615830039916

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jul 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion