ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07056062Updated Jul 9, 2025

Oral Calcium Supplementation in Labor

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Calcium carbonate in Uterine Contraction, Labor Complication and Labor Active Dilated Cm, sponsored by Arrowhead Regional Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-09.

Primary conditionDystociaRegistry: Obstetric Labor ComplicationsReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Obstetric Labor Complications — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Dystocia
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Dystocia, a narrower term within Obstetric Labor Complications.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Arrowhead Regional Medical Center · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was May 2025, 1 year 5 months ago, and no results have been posted to the registry.
  • Registered 1 year 1 month after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2024, registered Jun 2025).
Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
89
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if oral calcium carbonate can improve uterine contractions and labor outcomes in term pregnancies. It will also evaluate the safety of calcium carbonate when used during labor. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does oral calcium carbonate increase uterine contraction strength? Does it lead to shorter labor duration or higher vaginal delivery rates? What side effects or complications, if any, occur with calcium carbonate use during labor?

Researchers will compare oral calcium carbonate to no treatment to see if it helps improve labor efficiency and reduce cesarean delivery rates.

Participants will:

Be randomly assigned to receive either 2,000 mg of oral calcium carbonate or no intervention Undergo monitoring with an intrauterine pressure catheter to measure contraction strength Be observed for two hours without oxytocin to assess calcium's direct effect on contractions Have data collected on labor progression, delivery outcomes, and neonatal health

Read the detailed description

In the United States, nearly one-third of deliveries are performed via cesarean section, with labor dystocia remaining a leading indication. Labor dystocia may result from a variety of maternal and fetal factors, including malposition, cephalopelvic disproportion, or ineffective uterine contractions. When contractions are inadequate, the standard intervention is intravenous oxytocin. However, prolonged or high-dose oxytocin administration can lead to receptor desensitization, reducing its effectiveness and increasing the risk of postpartum hemorrhage.

Calcium plays a key role in myometrial contractility by facilitating calcium influx through L-type channels in myometrial cells, which triggers intracellular calcium release and action potentials. During labor, upregulation of calcium channels enhances the uterus's responsiveness to contractile stimuli. Elevated serum calcium levels have been associated with stronger and more effective contractions.

Adjunctive intravenous calcium administration with oxytocin has been shown to improve labor outcomes, including higher rates of vaginal delivery within 24 hours of induction and reduce blood loss in cesarean deliveries. However, the potential role of oral calcium supplementation in enhancing labor progression has not been evaluated in clinical trials. Given its physiological relevance, accessibility, and low-risk profile, oral calcium may represent a simple adjunct to improve labor efficiency and reduce cesarean rates.

This study aims to evaluate the impact of oral calcium carbonate supplementation during labor on uterine contractility and clinical outcomes. The investigators hypothesize that calcium carbonate administered intrapartum will enhance uterine contractions, resulting in higher vaginal delivery rates, shorter time to delivery, and reduced blood loss.

02

Conditions studied

  • Uterine Contraction
  • Labor Complication
  • Labor Active Dilated Cm
  • Labor Dystocia
  • Labor Duration
  • Labor
  • Labor Delivery

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • calcium carbonate
  • labor
  • vaginal delivery
  • cesarean delivery
03

In context

Dystocia Reclassified

55 studies on the registry are indexed under Dystocia; 12 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 89 is below the median of 200 across 42 interventional studies indexed under Dystocia.

Browse Dystocia studies →

Lead sponsor

Arrowhead Regional Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 15 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Compared within Dystocia, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Obstetric Labor Complications. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Had an intrauterine pressure catheter in place
  • Term gestation, greater than or equal to 37 weeks of gestation
  • Singleton pregnancy
  • Cephalic presentation
  • > 18 years of age

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • incarceration
  • multiple gestation
  • active illicit drug use
  • abnormal clinical pelvimetry
  • Suspected fetal macrosomia defined as estimated fetal weight ≥4250 grams
  • intrauterine growth restriction
  • abnormal placentation
  • prior cesarean delivery
  • maternal history of arrhythmia
  • hyperparathyroidism
  • heart failure
  • renal or hepatic failure
  • nephrolithiasis
  • receipt of medications known to affect uterine contractility-such as magnesium sulfate, terbutaline, or recent misoprostol in the last four hours
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
89 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Standard of care

    Received no medications but monitored for the duration of the study

  • Experimental
    Calcium carbonate

    2,000 mg PO calcium carbonate as a single dose

    Drug: Calcium carbonate

Interventions

  • 2,000 mg PO calcium carbonate as a single dose

    Also known as: TUMS

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Contraction Frequency

    Recording the number of contractions in a ten-minute period for 2 hours

    Time frame: Two hours after receiving the study medication or, for control participants, two hours after enrollment.

  2. Uterine contraction strength

    Recording Montevideo units every 30 minutes for 2 hours

    Time frame: Two hours after receiving the study medication or, for control participants, two hours after enrollment.

  3. Peak strength

    Recording the max pressure generated during a contraction using an intrauterine pressure catheter during the 2-hour study period

    Time frame: Two hours after receiving the study medication or, for control participants, two hours after enrollment.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Duration of the first stage of labor

    Record the length of the first stage of labor from 6 cm to 10 cm dilation

    Time frame: Calculated at the time of delivery

  2. Duration of the second stage of labor

    Record the time from 10 cm to delivery of the baby

    Time frame: Calculated at the time of delivery

  3. Mode of delivery

    Determine whether or not patient had a spontaneous vaginal bleeding, operative vaginal delivery, or cesarean delivery

    Time frame: Calculated at the time of delivery

  4. Pitocin dose

    Record the maximum dose of Pitocin used during labor

    Time frame: Calculated at the time of delivery

  5. Postpartum hemorrhage

    Determine which patients had a blood loss of greater than or equal to 1000 mL

    Time frame: at the time of discharge (assessed up to 5 days)

  6. Neonatal outcomes

    Determine which babies were admitted to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and had a low 5- minute APGAR score

    Time frame: at the time of discharge (assessed up to 5 days)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Arrowhead Regional Medical Center
    Colton, California 92324, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Cai R, Chen L, Xing Y, Deng Y, Li J, Guo F, Liu L, Xie C, Yang J. RETRACTED: Oxytocin with calcium vs oxytocin for induction of labor in women with term premature rupture of membranes: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2024 Nov;6(11):101502. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101502. Epub 2024 Sep 20. PubMed 39307241 ↗
  • Ansari JR, Yarmosh A, Michel G, Lyell D, Hedlin H, Cornfield DN, Carvalho B, Bateman BT. Intravenous Calcium to Decrease Blood Loss During Intrapartum Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Jan 1;143(1):104-112. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005441. Epub 2023 Nov 3. PubMed 37917943 ↗
  • Papandreou L, Chasiotis G, Seferiadis K, Thanasoulias NC, Dousias V, Tsanadis G, Stefos T. Calcium levels during the initiation of labor. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004 Jul 15;115(1):17-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2003.11.032. PubMed 15223159 ↗
  • Pehlivanoglu B, Bayrak S, Dogan M. A close look at the contraction and relaxation of the myometrium; the role of calcium. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2013 Dec 1;14(4):230-4. doi: 10.5152/jtgga.2013.67763. eCollection 2013. PubMed 24592112 ↗
  • Wray S, Jones K, Kupittayanant S, Li Y, Matthew A, Monir-Bishty E, Noble K, Pierce SJ, Quenby S, Shmygol AV. Calcium signaling and uterine contractility. J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2003 Jul;10(5):252-64. doi: 10.1016/s1071-5576(03)00089-3. PubMed 12853086 ↗
  • Obstetric care consensus no. 1: safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Mar;123(3):693-711. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000444441.04111.1d. PubMed 24553167 ↗

Related links

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Study has already been completed, will analyze data first and then decide

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Apr 2024 to primary completion in May 2025, 13 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 21, 2025
First posted
Jul 9, 2025
StartActual
Apr 30, 2024
Primary completionActual
May 30, 2025
CompletionActual
May 30, 2025
Last update
Jul 9, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 9, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07056062
Lead sponsor
Arrowhead Regional Medical Center
Responsible party
Tina Bui (MFM Fellow, Arrowhead Regional Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 9, 2025
Start date
Apr 30, 2024
Primary completion
May 30, 2025
Completion
May 30, 2025
Last update
Jul 9, 2025

Study contacts

Guillermo Valenzuela, MD
principal investigator · Arrowhead Regional Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Calcium Carbonate

Start the discussion