CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07049952BabySTrong IIUpdated Nov 21, 2025

BabySTrong II taVNS Feeding Trial

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of taVNS and NAC and taVNS in Feeding Delays and Neonates and Term Infants, sponsored by Medical University of South Carolina. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 39 Weeks to 54 Weeks. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-11-21.

Sponsored by Medical University of South Carolina · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Nov 2025; still recruiting 10 months later.
Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
88
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
39 Weeks to 54 Weeks
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The long-term goal of this project is to develop a therapy to assist pre-term and term infants with brain injury overcome difficulties in learning to feed so that infants may be discharged home with their families and avoid the burdens of of a gastrostomy tube (G-tube) or prolonged home nasogastric feeding. Few other therapies exist for infants who are not making progress with feeding volumes at term age.

To tackle this problem, we took the novel approach of pairing non-invasive nerve stimulation of the vagus nerve at the ear (taVNS) stimulation with the motor skills of feeding. In our pilot studies, 54% (19 out of 35) infants with feeding delays whose families were in discussions for G-tube placement, reached full oral feeds within 2 weeks, and infants who did not reach full feeds still improved their daily oral feeding volumes. Infants who got to full feeds showed stronger and more complex brain circuits associated with feeding motor skills.

With this trial we will test the BabySTrong taVNS feeding system in a multicenter, randomized, controlled, blinded trial to show how well this feeding system works in improving the daily feeding volumes, the days to full oral feeds, and/or the number of infants who avoid G-tube/ home NG placement, and increasing connections in brain circuits. If this groundbreaking new approach to infant feeding is successful, we may decrease how long infants are in the hospital, costs with Gtubes and home NG feeds, and family and care provider burdens. The findings from this proposal will be used in our FDA application for the BabySTrong feeding system.

Read the detailed description

In this STTR, we will test the safety and efficacy of the BabyStrong taVNS feeding system in infants with feeding delays in a randomized, controlled, triple blinded, multicenter trial. With this safety and efficacy data, we intend to apply for FDA approval and commercially develop the BabyStrong feeding device.

Aim 1) Determine if twice daily active taVNS-paired feeding treatment increases the number of infants reaching full oral feeds or daily oral feeding volumes, or decreases the time to attain full oral feeds compared with infants receiving sham stimulation in a randomized, controlled, triple-blinded trial. We will randomize based on non-IDM or IDM status to 4 groups: IDMs will be randomized 1:1 to Active taVNS-paired feeds (Group T), or sham taVNS paired with feeds (Non-IDM Control); For IDM infants we will randomize 1:1 to N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and active taVNS-paired feeds (Group NT), or placebo and sham taVNS (IDM Control). Blinded randomized treatments will continue for 14 days, then all infants may progress to open label treatment, based on IDM status, for another 10days or less if full oral feeds or a decision to place a G-tube is reached. This study design will allow us to randomize to appropriate treatment based on IDM status. We will combine groups for analyses (Any active taVNS versus Control groups (IDM and Non-IDM combined), while controlling for IDM status. We hypothesize that any taVNS treatment (T + NT) will be effective at improving oral feeds over control (C).

We will also perform within stratified group analyses of active treatment versus control. We will use the non-IDM group results to support an FDA application.

Aim 2) Determine if active taVNS-paired feeding induces neuroplasticity compared with sham treated infants. We will measure diffusion kurtosis and tensor metrics in DKI scans at baseline and at the end of the 14d randomized treatment. We expect increased complexity (mean kurtosis) in corticospinal tracts in active vs sham groups.

Aim 3) Use safety and efficacy data to finalize an application for FDA approval of the BabyStrong, as a system with demonstrated potential to accelerate oromotor learning and decrease the need for Gubes and home NG feeds in infants.

02

Conditions studied

  • Feeding Delays
  • Neonates and Term Infants

Keywords

  • taVNS
  • feeding delays
  • infants
  • IDM
  • non-IDM
  • G-tube
  • transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation
  • Home NG feeds
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Medical University of South Carolina is the lead sponsor of 852 studies on the registry; 165 are open to participants now.

Of its 128 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 101 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
39 Weeks to 54 Weeks
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • infants >39 weeks PMA making minimal progress in oral feeds
  • trying to learn feeding for at least 2wks if beginning feeds at term (>37wks PMA), and 4wks if beginning feeds \<36wks PMA,
  • may po every feed without volume limitations by therapists

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • cardiomyopathy
  • unstable apnea/bradycardia
  • significant respiratory support (CPAP/ Vapotherm)
  • unrepaired major congenital anomalies that affect safe po feeding or impose volume restrictions
  • congenital syndromes unlikely to orally feed
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
88 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Non-IDM active taVNS

    Non-IDM (Infants not product of diabetic mothers) will receive active taVNS with 2 feeds/day x 14 days

    Device: taVNS

  • Sham comparator
    Non-IDM Control

    Non-IDM (Infants not product of diabetic mothers) will receive inactive/sham taVNS paired with 2 oral feedings a day for 14 days.

    Device: inactive taVNS

  • Active comparator
    IDM NAC and active taVNS

    Infants of diabetic mothers will receive N-acetylcysteine by NG tube every 6h and active taVNS paired with 2 oral feedings a day, as a drug and device combination treatment for 14 days.

    Combination Product: NAC and taVNS

  • Sham comparator
    IDM Control

    Infants of diabetic mothers will receive sterile water and inactive taVNS paired with 2 oral feedings a day, as a placebo drug and sham device combination treatment, for 14 days.

    Combination Product: sterile water and inactive taVNS

Interventions

  • DevicetaVNS

    Active or inactive non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation of the auricular branch of the vagus nerve paired with 2 oral feedings/day for 14d

  • Combination productNAC and taVNS

    NAC 100 mg/kg diluted 1:3 with sterile water (or equal volume sterile water), q6h NG 1h before a feed for 4d prior to delivering active or sham taVNS paired with 2 feeds/day for 14d with NAC (or sterile water).

  • Deviceinactive taVNS

    inactive transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation with 2 feeds/day x 14 days

  • Combination productsterile water and inactive taVNS

    Sterile water per NG tube every 6h for 4 days, then continuing with 14days of inactive taVNS paired with oral feeding

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. number of participants at full oral feeds

    number of participants achieving full oral feeds receiving ANY active taVNS (groups T+NT), vs Control (IDM combined with Non IDM control groups), based on the randomized assignment.

    Time frame: 24 days

  2. rate of increase in daily oral feeding volumes

    mean daily rate of increase in oral feeding volumes in any active taVNS group (T+NT) vs Control (IDM and Non-IDM combined), based on randomized treatment assignment.

    Time frame: 7days / 10days

Secondary outcomes

  1. time to full oral feeds

    days to full oral feeds in any taVNS (groups T+NT) vs Control

    Time frame: 24 days

  2. Neuroplasticity via DKI

    increased mean kurtosis (complexity ) or FA (integrity) in corticospinal tracts in any active taVNS (Groups T+ NT) vs Control groups

    Time frame: 14 days

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Shawn Jenkins Children's Hospital, Medical University of South Carolina
    Charleston, South Carolina 29425, United States
    • Dorothea D Jenkins, MD · Contact · jenkd@musc.edu · 843-792-2112
    • Sandra Garner, PharmD · Sub investigator
    • Hunter Moss, PhD · Sub investigator
    • Heather McGhee, PhD SLP · Sub investigator
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Badran BW, Dowdle LT, Mithoefer OJ, LaBate NT, Coatsworth J, Brown JC, DeVries WH, Austelle CW, McTeague LM, George MS. Neurophysiologic effects of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) via electrical stimulation of the tragus: A concurrent taVNS/fMRI study and review. Brain Stimul. 2018 May-Jun;11(3):492-500. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.12.009. Epub 2017 Dec 29. PubMed 29361441 ↗
  • Badran BW, Mithoefer OJ, Summer CE, LaBate NT, Glusman CE, Badran AW, DeVries WH, Summers PM, Austelle CW, McTeague LM, Borckardt JJ, George MS. Short trains of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) have parameter-specific effects on heart rate. Brain Stimul. 2018 Jul-Aug;11(4):699-708. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.04.004. Epub 2018 Apr 6. PubMed 29716843 ↗
  • Badran BW, Jenkins DD, DeVries WH, Dancy M, Summers PM, Mappin GM, Bernstein H, Bikson M, Coker-Bolt P, George MS. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) for improving oromotor function in newborns. Brain Stimul. 2018 Sep-Oct;11(5):1198-1200. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.06.009. Epub 2018 Jun 30. No abstract available. PubMed 30146041 ↗
  • Moss HG, Brown TR, Wiest DB, Jenkins DD. N-Acetylcysteine rapidly replenishes central nervous system glutathione measured via magnetic resonance spectroscopy in human neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2018 Jun;38(6):950-958. doi: 10.1177/0271678X18765828. Epub 2018 Mar 21. PubMed 29561203 ↗
  • Badran BW, Brown JC, Dowdle LT, Mithoefer OJ, LaBate NT, Coatsworth J, DeVries WH, Austelle CW, McTeague LM, Yu A, Bikson M, Jenkins DD, George MS. Tragus or cymba conchae? Investigating the anatomical foundation of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS). Brain Stimul. 2018 Jul-Aug;11(4):947-948. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.06.003. Epub 2018 Jun 6. No abstract available. PubMed 29895444 ↗
  • Badran BW, Yu AB, Adair D, Mappin G, DeVries WH, Jenkins DD, George MS, Bikson M. Laboratory Administration of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (taVNS): Technique, Targeting, and Considerations. J Vis Exp. 2019 Jan 7;(143):10.3791/58984. doi: 10.3791/58984. PubMed 30663712 ↗
  • Badran BW, Jenkins DD, Cook D, Thompson S, Dancy M, DeVries WH, Mappin G, Summers P, Bikson M, George MS. Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation-Paired Rehabilitation for Oromotor Feeding Problems in Newborns: An Open-Label Pilot Study. Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Mar 18;14:77. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00077. eCollection 2020. PubMed 32256328 ↗
  • Aljuhani T, Haskin H, Davis S, Reiner A, Moss HG, Badran BW, George MS, Jenkins D, Coker-Bolt P. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) given for poor feeding in at-risk infants also improves their motor abilities. J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2022;15(3):447-457. doi: 10.3233/PRM-210090. PubMed 36093716 ↗
  • Jenkins DD, Moss HG, Adams LE, Hunt S, Dancy M, Huffman SM, Cook D, Jensen JH, Summers P, Thompson S, George MS, Badran BW. Higher Dose Noninvasive Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation Increases Feeding Volumes and White Matter Microstructural Complexity in Open-Label Study of Infants Slated for Gastrostomy Tube. J Pediatr. 2023 Nov;262:113563. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2023.113563. Epub 2023 Jun 16. PubMed 37329979 ↗
  • Aljuhani T, Coker-Bolt P, Katikaneni L, Ramakrishnan V, Brennan A, George MS, Badran BW, Jenkins D. Use of non-invasive transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation: neurodevelopmental and sensory follow-up. Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 Nov 9;17:1297325. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1297325. eCollection 2023. PubMed 38021221 ↗
  • Jenkins DD, Garner SS, Brennan A, Morris J, Bonham K, Adams L, Hunt S, Moss H, Badran BW, George MS, Wiest DB. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation may benefit from the addition of N-acetylcysteine to facilitate motor learning in infants of diabetic mothers failing oral feeds. Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 May 22;18:1373543. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1373543. eCollection 2024. PubMed 38841121 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — We will preserve and share the subject level feeding, heart rate, and developmental test data with unique identifiers. The individual MRI scans will be preserved in Dicom and .rda format; and the VFSS in video files with same unique, coded identifiers.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Icf

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 21, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07049952
Lead sponsor
Medical University of South Carolina
Collaborators
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
Responsible party
Dorothea Jenkins (Professor-Faculty, Medical University of South Carolina) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 3, 2025
Start date
Nov 16, 2025
Primary completion
Apr 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 21, 2025

Study contacts

Dorothea D Jenkins, MD
Contact
jenkd@musc.edu
843-792-2112
Gary Connor, RN
Contact
gconnor@asclepiusresearch.com
207-281-2652
Dorothea D JENKINS, MD
principal investigator · Medical University of South Carolina

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion