CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT07037368Updated Jun 25, 2025

Impact of Delivery Mode on Coccydynia, Pelvic Girdle Pain and Rectus Diastasis in Postpartum Females

An observational study in Pelvic Girdle Pain and Rectus Diastasis, sponsored by Superior University. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to female participants aged 20 Years to 40 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-06-25.

Sponsored by Superior University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
73
Ages
20 Years to 40 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This comparative observational study investigates the impact of delivery mode vaginal delivery versus cesarean section on the prevalence and severity of three postpartum musculoskeletal complications: coccydynia, pelvic girdle pain (PGP), and rectus diastasis (RD). Conducted on postpartum females aged 20-40 years within 6 weeks to 6 months after childbirth, the study aims to highlight musculoskeletal outcomes often overlooked in standard postpartum care.

Read the detailed description

A total of 73 participants were selected through non-probability sampling from rehabilitation centers and home-based postpartum populations in Lahore. Pain intensity and musculoskeletal impairments were assessed using validated tools: the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for coccydynia, Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire (PGQ) for PGP, and finger-width palpation technique for RD. The data collection involved both self-reported questionnaires and clinical assessments by trained professionals. The goal is to identify how delivery mode influences musculoskeletal health and to support the development of more tailored physiotherapy interventions and postpartum care strategies.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pelvic Girdle Pain
  • Rectus Diastasis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Pelvic Girdle Pain

55 studies on the registry are indexed under Pelvic Girdle Pain; 12 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 73 is below the median of 105 across 15 observational studies indexed under Pelvic Girdle Pain.

Browse Pelvic Girdle Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Superior University is the lead sponsor of 242 studies on the registry; 24 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

This comparative observational study investigates the impact of delivery mode vaginal delivery versus cesarean section on the prevalence and severity of three postpartum musculoskeletal complications: coccydynia, pelvic girdle pain (PGP), and rectus diastasis (RD).

Inclusion criteria

  • Postpartum females aged 20-40 years
  • Females who delivered via vaginal delivery or cesarean section
  • 6 weeks to 6 months postpartum period
  • Willingness to participate and provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Females with a history of pelvic or spinal surgery prior to pregnancy
  • Known cases of pre-existing musculoskeletal disorders (e.g., scoliosis, chronic back pain)
  • Multiple pregnancies (twins or more) in the current or previous delivery
  • Postpartum complications unrelated to delivery mode (e.g., sepsis, trauma)
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
73 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Impact of Delivery Mode

    Behavioral: Impact of Delivery Mode

Interventions

  • BehavioralImpact of Delivery Mode

    investigates the impact of delivery mode vaginal delivery versus cesarean section on the prevalence and severity of three postpartum musculoskeletal complications: coccydynia, pelvic girdle pain (PGP), and rectus diastasis (RD). Conducted on postpartum females

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Visual Analog Scale

    A 10 cm horizontal line marked from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Scoring: The participant marks a point on the line that best represents their pain intensity. The score is measured in centimeters from the "no pain" end. Higher scores indicate more severe pain.

    Time frame: 6 Month

  2. Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire (PGQ)

    Contains 25 items divided into two domains: activity limitations (20 items) and symptoms (5 items). Scoring: Each item is rated on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all, 1 = to a small extent, 2 = to some extent, 3 = to a great extent). Scores are summed, converted into a percentage of the maximum possible score. Higher percentages reflect greater pelvic girdle pain and disability.

    Time frame: 6 Months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Superior University CRC
    Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 25, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07037368
Lead sponsor
Superior University
Responsible party
Muhammad Naveed Babur (Principal Investigator, Superior University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 25, 2025
Start date
Mar 4, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2025
Completion
Sep 30, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 25, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Jun 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion