ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07027735ECMRCRUpdated Sep 10, 2026

Decellularized Human Placental Extracellular Matrix Tissue for Rotator Cuff Repair Augmentation

An interventional study of Rotator Cuff Repair with Allograft Patch and Rotator Cuff Repair with No Augmentation in Rotator Cuff Tear, sponsored by Columbia University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-10.

Sponsored by Columbia University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 168 studies in Rotator Cuff Injuries with a site in United States — 40 open to participants now, 50 under way, none of them phase 3. Rotator Cuff Injuries · United States.

Planned enrollment
26th of 130
120 · median 60
Started
2027
with 1 other
No phase
86 of 168
21 open now
Primary completion
2027-07
later than 32 of 49 live
Registered
160th of 168
by date

Among the 168 studies in Rotator Cuff Injuries with a site in United States, this one is the 26th largest by planned enrollment of the 130 interventional ones, is one of 2 that started in 2027, is one of 86 with no phase, reaches primary completion later than 32 of the 49 other live ones, and was the 160th registered.

By phase

168 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

No phasethis study86 · 21 open
Observational38 · 10 open
Phase 422 · 4 open
Phase 18 · 1 open
Phase 26 · 2 open
Phase 1/23 · 2 open
Phase 33 · 0 open
Phase 2/32 · 0 open

By the year they started

First in 2005; this study’s year is marked. 2 started in 2027.

Size and results

Median enrollment 60 across the 130 interventional studies, 77 across the 38 observational. Of the 86 that completed or were terminated, 28 (33%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 168 studies in Rotator Cuff Injuries with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The rotator cuff is a set of muscles and tendons that help move the shoulder. Tears in the rotator cuff are common, particularly as people age. Consequently, rotator cuff repair surgeries are common, as well. Despite the frequency with which rotator cuff repairs are performed, there remains a high rate of postoperative failure to heal. In such situations, there is a lack of connective tissue establishment between the rotator cuff tendon and the bone. One strategy to attempt to improve healing of the rotator cuff tendon back to the bone is via the use of extracellular matrix allograft. This treatment is composed of tissue from other humans, which is stripped of its cells so that just the scaffolding around the cells remains. This decellularized scaffolding can be placed at the rotator cuff healing site in an attempt to augment healing. Both animal studies and human studies have shown promise with this approach. Of those patients enrolling in the study, 50% will be assigned at random to receive a standard rotator cuff repair AND allograft treatment, while 50% will be assigned at random to receive standard rotator cuff repair WITHOUT allograft treatment. All patients enrolled in the study will also obtain an MRI at one year following surgery in order to assess tendon healing. Of note, one-year postoperative MRIs are not standard following rotator cuff repair - only those enrolled in the study will receive this MRI. There will be no financial consequence of receiving this MRI.

Read the detailed description

Rotator cuff repair is one of the most commonly performed orthopedic surgeries, with over 450,000 surgeries performed every year in the United States. Unfortunately, the failure rate postoperatively remains unacceptably high despite advances in surgical techniques and rehabilitation strategies. Clinical studies have shown that only about half of repaired rotator cuffs heal by 12 months following surgery, with the rate of recurrent tears ranging from 20% in the best case and as high as 94% in certain patient populations with massive tears. Animal model studies indicate that the high failure rate after surgical repair is due to a lack of regeneration of the native tendon-to-bone transitional tissue. This native transition zone, the enthesis, is a functionally graded mineralized fibrocartilaginous structure that minimizes stress concentrations at the interface between the mechanically dissimilar tissues of tendon and bone. Rather than re-formation of this fibrocartilaginous transition, necessary for effective load transfer between tendon and bone, an abrupt transition of fibrovascular scar forms at the healing interface and the underlying bone resorbs. remodeling and are used to augment the body's natural healing response. The efficacy of decellularized ECM treatment in rotator cuff repair, specifically, has been demonstrated by animal studies, which have shown that decellularized ECM contributes to cell ingrowth, improved remodeling, and, ultimately, an improved repair as gauged by biomechanical testing. Similarly, human studies have also been promising. Decellularized ECM treatment was shown to both reduce retear rate and improve patient outcome scores when used in the treatment of large to massive rotator cuff tears in humans.

Connective tissue is the fibrous extracellular matrix (ECM) that provides the physical structure and support of the body's tissues. The efficacy of decellularized ECMs to augment damaged tissue and support tissue repair throughout the body (e.g. tendon, ligament, bone, mucosal, and integumental) has been well-documented in the literature. Decellularized ECMs contain ECM components to support tissue remodeling and are used to augment the body's natural healing response. The efficacy of decellularized ECM treatment in rotator cuff repair, specifically, has been demonstrated by animal studies, which have shown that decellularized ECM contributes to cell ingrowth, improved remodeling, and, ultimately, an improved repair as gauged by biomechanical testing. Similarly, human studies have also been promising. Decellularized ECM treatment was shown to both reduce retear rate and improve patient outcome scores when used in the treatment of large to massive rotator cuff tears in humans.

This is a single center prospective randomized controlled trial. Subjects will be recruited from patients seen by one of three participating shoulder and elbow surgeons at outpatient visits for their rotator cuff tear diagnosis at Columbia University Medical Center or any of the affiliated hospitals and/or outpatient office spaces. Adult patients (age 18 years or older) with a diagnosis of full thickness rotator cuff tear who meet operative criteria, including significant pain and weakness that have failed nonoperative management or arose from an acute injury, will be included in this study. Patients with partial thickness tears, full thickness subscapularis tears, Goutallier grade 3 and 4 fatty degeneration, and/or prior rotator cuff surgeries will be excluded from the study. Patients will receive preoperative clearance in accordance with current practices. Post-transplant patients will receive screening for infectious diseases, including HIV, HBV, and HCV, prior to surgery. Patients will be randomized via simple randomization into one of two groups - standard arthroscopic repair with decellularized ECM vs. standard arthroscopic repair without decellularized ECM. Patients will be seen postoperatively at 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. All patients will undergo comparable rehabilitation programs. An MRI will be performed at 12 months postoperatively. Any incidental MRI findings will be dealt with in accordance with standard practice. The primary outcome measure will be the postoperative retear rate, measured on one year postoperative MRI. Secondary outcome measures will both additional MRI measurements, including tendon structural continuity and tendon thickness, as well as patient reported outcomes, including Constant-Murley score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, VAS Pain scores, and EQ-5D-5L. Patient reported outcomes will be collected at all patient visits.

03

Conditions studied

  • Rotator Cuff Tear

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • rotator cuff tear
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Diagnosis of full thickness rotator cuff tear

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Partial thickness tears
  • Full thickness subscapularis tears
  • Goutallier grades 3 and 4
  • Prior rotator cuff surgery
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Treatment Arm

    Standard Rotator Cuff Repair + Receives Allograft Treatment

    Other: Rotator Cuff Repair with Allograft Patch

  • Other
    Control Arm

    Standard Rotator Cuff Repair + NO Allograft Treatment

    Other: Rotator Cuff Repair with No Augmentation

Interventions

  • OtherRotator Cuff Repair with Allograft Patch

    Rotator cuff repairs will be augmented with use of a decellularized human placental allograft patch

  • OtherRotator Cuff Repair with No Augmentation

    Standard rotator cuff repair with no augmentation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Retear Rate

    The primary outcome measure will be the postoperative retear rate, measured on one-year postoperative MRI

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Tendon Structural Continuity (MRI)

    MRI Measurement of Tendon Structural Continuity

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Tendon Thickness (MRI)

    MRI measurement of tendon thickness

    Time frame: 1 year

  3. Constant-Murley score

    The Constant-Murley score is a 100-point scale used to assess shoulder function, with a higher score indicating better function. The components include Pain (0 - 15 points), Activities of Daily Living (0 - 20 points), Range of Motion (0 - 40 points), and Strength (0 -25 points). The full score range is 0 to 100.

    Time frame: 1 year

  4. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score

    The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score is a patient-reported assessment of shoulder pain and function. It ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better function. The ASES score combines a pain component (assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) that ranges from 0 - 50) and a functional component (10 items, 5 points each). The full score range is 0 to 100.

    Time frame: 1 year

  5. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain scores

    The VAS Pain full range is 0 to 10, with a higher score indicating worse pain imaginable.

    Time frame: 1 year

  6. EQ-5D Index Value (Utility Score)

    The EQ-5D Index Value is a single number that summarizes the health state described by the EQ-5D questionnaire. The full range is 0 (worst health state, equivalent to death) to 1 (perfect health).

    Time frame: 1 year

  7. EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ VAS)

    EQ-VAS is a self-reported measure used to assess a patient's health-related quality of life on a scale from 0 to 100. The scale ranges from "worst imaginable health" (0) to "best imaginable health" (100).

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • NewYorkPresbyterian Hospital @ Columbia University Irving Medical Center
    New York, New York 10032-3702, United States
    • William Levine, MD · Principal investigator
    • Charles Jobin, MD · Sub investigator
    • Michael Knudsen, MD · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Jan 2027; primary completion for Jul 2027, 6 months later.

Of 228 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Rotator Cuff Injuries, half reached primary completion within 19 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 39. This study's planned 6 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 252 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 44.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 11, 2025
First posted
Jun 18, 2025
StartEst.
Jan 2027
Primary completionEst.
Jul 1, 2027
CompletionEst.
Jul 1, 2027
Last update
Sep 10, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 10, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07027735
Collaborators
CTM Biomedical
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 18, 2025
Start date
Jan 2027 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 10, 2026

Study contacts

William Levine, MD
principal investigator · Columbia University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion