CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07027709Updated Jun 18, 2025

Clinical Performance of Hybrid Ceramic Laminate Veneers

An interventional study of BeautiBond Xtreme pretreatment with BeautiLink SA cementation and HC Primer pretreatment with BeautiLink SA cementation in Bonding of Veneers After Different Treatment, sponsored by Cairo University. Recruiting at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 21 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-06-18.

Sponsored by Cairo University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2025; still recruiting 1 year 4 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
28
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized controlled trial evaluates the clinical performance of laminate veneers fabricated from HC hard blocks pretreated with BeautiBond Xtreme versus HC Primer, using BeautiLink SA cement. The study focuses on marginal adaptation, retention, discoloration, and recurrent caries over 18 months.

Read the detailed description

This clinical trial compares two bonding protocols for hybrid ceramic laminate veneers. The veneers are fabricated from HC hard blocks and bonded using BeautiLink SA resin cement. One group receives BeautiBond Xtreme pretreatment, while the other receives HC Primer. The study assesses marginal adaptation, retention, recurrent caries, and discoloration over 18 months to determine the superior clinical bonding protocol for these restorations.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bonding of Veneers After Different Treatment
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Cairo University is the lead sponsor of 4,780 studies on the registry; 1,427 are open to participants now.

Of its 36 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (14%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:dult patients ≥ 21 years requiring laminate veneers in the esthetic zone, vital or endodontically treated teeth, sufficient enamel, willing and able to consent and comply.

-

Exclusion Criteria: Periodontal disease, bruxism, poor hygiene, pregnancy, systemic illness, allergies, insufficient enamel, ongoing trials, orthodontic treatment.

-

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
28 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    BeautiBond Xtreme Pretreatment Group

    atients in this group will receive laminate veneers fabricated from HC hard blocks. The inner surface of the veneers will be pretreated with BeautiBond Xtreme, and the veneers will be bonded using BeautiLink SA self-adhesive resin cement. This group is used to assess the clinical performance of BeautiBond Xtreme pretreatment over an 18-month follow-up.

    Device: BeautiBond Xtreme pretreatment with BeautiLink SA cementation

  • Active comparator
    HC Primer Pretreatment Group

    atients in this group will receive laminate veneers fabricated from HC hard blocks. The inner surface of the veneers will be pretreated with HC Primer, and the veneers will be bonded using BeautiLink SA self-adhesive resin cement. This group serves as a comparator to evaluate differences in clinical outcomes relative to the BeautiBond Xtreme group.

    Procedure: HC Primer pretreatment with BeautiLink SA cementation

Interventions

  • DeviceBeautiBond Xtreme pretreatment with BeautiLink SA cementation

    Laminate veneers fabricated from HC hard blocks were pretreated on the internal surface with BeautiBond Xtreme, then bonded to tooth structure using BeautiLink SA self-adhesive resin cement. The tooth surfaces were also treated with BeautiBond Xtreme. Veneers were digitally designed and milled, then cemented following a standardized clinical protocol.

  • ProcedureHC Primer pretreatment with BeautiLink SA cementation

    Laminate veneers fabricated from HC hard blocks were pretreated on the internal surface with HC Primer, then bonded to tooth structure using BeautiLink SA self-adhesive resin cement. The tooth surfaces were treated with BeautiBond Xtreme. Veneers were digitally designed and milled, then cemented following the same clinical protocol used in the experimental grou

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary Outcome: Marginal Adaptation

    (Modified USPHS)

    Time frame: Measured at 6, 12, 18 months.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Çötert İ, Çötert HS. Survival of partial laminate veneers and categorical covariates affecting the survival: a systematic review. Open Dent J. 2023;17(1) Ho CCK. Appraisal and cementation of porcelain laminate veneers. In: Banerji S, Mehta SB, Ho CCK, editors. Practical procedures in aesthetic dentistry. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons; 2017. Bajaj M, Jha P, Nikhil V. Shade selection in esthetic dentistry. IP Indian J Conserv Endod. 2023;8(2):79-85. http://doi. org/10.18231/j.ijce.2023.015. De Munck, J., Van Landuyt, K., Peumans, M., Poitevin, A., Lambrechts, P., Braem, M., & Van Meerbeek, B. (2012). A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. Journal of Dental Research, 91(4), 351-381. Frankenberger, R., Hartmann, V. E., Krech, M., Krämer, N., Reich, S., Braun, A., & Roggendorf, M. (2015). Adhesive luting of new CAD/CAM materials. International Journal of Computerized Dentistry, 18(1), 9-20. Morimoto, S., Rebello de Sampaio, F. B., Braga, M. M., Sesma, N., & Özcan, M. (2016). Survival rate of resin and ceramic inlays, onlays, and overlays: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Dental Research, 95(9), 985-994. Lawson, N. C., Bansal, R., & Burgess, J. O. (2016). Wear, strength, modulus and hardness of CAD/CAM restorative materials. Dental Materials, 32(11), e275-e283. El Zohairy, A.A.; De Gee, A.J.; Mohsen, M.M.; Feilzer, A.J. Microtensile bond strength testing of luting cements to prefabricated CAD/CAM ceramic and composite blocks. Dent. Mater. 2003, 19, 575-583.Lührs, A. K., De Munck, J., Geurtsen, W., & Van Meerbeek, B. (2014). Composite cements benefit from light-curing. Dental Materials, 30(3), 292-301. Frankenberger, R.; Lohbauer, U.; Taschner, M.; Petschelt, A.; Nikolaenko, S.A. Adhesive luting revisited: influence of adhesive, temporary cement, cavity cleaning, and curing mode on internal dentin bond strength. J. Adhes. Dent. 2007, 9, 269-273. Dos Santos, V.H.; Griza, S.; de Morae

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — this is a university-sponsored clinical study with a small sample size and limited scope. No plan to share individual participant data (IPD) has been established due to privacy considerations and the nature of the trial. However, summary-level results may be published in peer-reviewed journals and conferences.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 18, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07027709
Lead sponsor
Cairo University
Responsible party
Omnia Mohammed Wafik (PRINCIPLE INVESTIGATOR, Cairo University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 18, 2025
Start date
Jun 1, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 18, 2025

Study contacts

omnia Mohammed Wafik, lecturer
Contact
omniawafik@gmail.com
00201006595375

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion