ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07016204Updated Apr 16, 2026

CBT Effects on Neurophysiological and Psychological Outcomes in Body Dysmorphic Disorder

An interventional study of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy in Body Dysmorphic Disorder, sponsored by Istanbul Nisantasi University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-16.

Sponsored by Istanbul Nisantasi University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This clinical trial aims to investigate how a specific type of psychotherapy called Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT) can help people who experience Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD). BDD is a mental health condition where individuals become excessively preoccupied with perceived flaws in their physical appearance-flaws that are often unnoticeable to others. This distress can interfere significantly with their social, emotional, and daily functioning.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether a 12-week CBT program can reduce symptoms of BDD and bring about measurable changes in brain activity, physiological stress responses, and patterns of visual attention when individuals view their own faces or appearance-related images. The researchers will use brainwave recordings (EEG), skin response sensors (GSR), and eye-tracking technology to assess these changes. In addition, participants will complete a set of questionnaires that measure depression, anxiety, emotion regulation, self-esteem, body image beliefs, and self-compassion.

Sixty individuals will take part in the study. Thirty will receive CBT sessions once a week for 12 weeks, while the other thirty will be placed on a waitlist and offered treatment later. The study will compare how symptoms and neurophysiological responses change before and after therapy, and whether these changes differ between those who received immediate treatment and those who did not.

The researchers hypothesize that CBT will reduce emotional distress, improve emotion regulation, and shift brain and body responses toward healthier patterns. This study will help identify how and why therapy works for BDD, and whether technologies like EEG and eye-tracking can be used to monitor treatment progress.

Read the detailed description

Detailed Description Background and Rationale Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD) is a chronic and often severely impairing psychiatric disorder characterized by intrusive preoccupations with perceived flaws in one's appearance-flaws that are often imperceptible to others. Individuals with BDD engage in compulsive behaviors such as mirror checking, grooming, or social avoidance, leading to functional impairment and heightened psychological distress. The condition has a high comorbidity with depression and anxiety, and individuals with BDD are at increased risk for suicidality.

Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT) is the most evidence-based intervention for BDD, targeting cognitive distortions, avoidance behaviors, and emotional dysregulation related to body image. However, despite robust clinical outcomes, the underlying neurophysiological mechanisms of CBT's effectiveness remain insufficiently explored. This trial seeks to address that gap by integrating behavioral symptom change with objective neurophysiological and attentional measures.

This study investigates whether a structured 12-week CBT program produces measurable improvements in brain function, autonomic nervous system response, and attentional bias among individuals with BDD. By combining EEG, GSR, and eye-tracking methods with validated clinical instruments, the research aims to clarify how therapy modulates both the subjective experience and biological correlates of body image disturbance.

Study Design This is a randomized controlled trial with a pre-post design involving two groups: a CBT intervention group and a waitlist control group. Sixty participants aged 18-50 will be recruited. Thirty participants will meet DSM-5 criteria for BDD and will be randomly assigned to either the CBT intervention group (n=15) or the waitlist control group (n=15). An additional healthy control group (n=30) will serve as a normative baseline for neurophysiological comparisons but will not receive any intervention.

The intervention consists of twelve 60-minute weekly CBT sessions focused on psychoeducation, cognitive restructuring, exposure and response prevention (ERP), mindfulness-based emotional regulation techniques, and attentional retraining exercises.

Experimental Protocol

Participants will undergo pre- and post-treatment assessments that include the following:

Neurophysiological Assessment:

EEG recordings will measure event-related potentials (ERPs) such as N170, P300, Late Positive Potential (LPP), and frontal alpha asymmetry.

GSR will capture sympathetic arousal and recovery rates during exposure to appearance-related stimuli.

Eye-tracking will measure fixation duration, pupil dilation, and gaze patterns toward self-perceived flaws and control features.

Stimuli:

Participants will be exposed to images of their own faces (unaltered, neutral, and digitally altered), appearance-related emotional stimuli (e.g., idealized or distorted faces), and non-threatening neutral or positive stimuli.

After each stimulus, they will rate their distress on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10.

Psychometric Assessment:

The following validated self-report and clinician-rated scales will be administered at baseline and post-treatment:

Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale Modified for Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD-YBOCS): Measures the severity of appearance-related obsessions and compulsions.

Body Image Disturbance Questionnaire (BIDQ): Assesses subjective dissatisfaction and interference caused by perceived appearance flaws.

Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ): Evaluates cognitive reappraisal and suppression strategies used to manage emotions.

Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II): Measures depressive symptom severity.

Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI): Measures general anxiety symptoms.

Data Analysis Plan ERP components will be analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA, focusing on pre-post changes within and between groups. GSR data will be analyzed through paired and independent sample t-tests comparing skin conductance response and recovery. Eye-tracking data will be evaluated using linear mixed-effects models to identify patterns in fixation and gaze shifts.

Changes in psychometric scores will be analyzed via paired t-tests and ANCOVAs. Correlation analyses will examine the association between clinical improvement and physiological markers (e.g., reduced BDD-YBOCS scores and normalized alpha asymmetry). The statistical threshold will be set at p \< .05, and all analyses will follow an intention-to-treat approach.

Scientific and Clinical Contribution This study represents a novel integration of CBT with multi-modal neurophysiological measurement in the context of BDD. It seeks to identify treatment-sensitive biomarkers of emotional and attentional regulation that may serve both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. If successful, the findings will contribute to the development of personalized CBT interventions guided by real-time physiological feedback and objective clinical markers.

02

Conditions studied

  • Body Dysmorphic Disorder

Keywords

  • Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
  • BDD
  • Body Image
  • EEG
  • Eye-Tracking
  • GSR
03

In context

Body Dysmorphic Disorders

56 studies on the registry are indexed under Body Dysmorphic Disorders; 11 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is above the median of 52 across 44 interventional studies indexed under Body Dysmorphic Disorders.

Browse Body Dysmorphic Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Istanbul Nisantasi University is the lead sponsor of 21 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosed with Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD) according to criteria
  • Right-handed (to ensure consistency in EEG lateralization analyses)
  • Minimum education level of high school (for questionnaire comprehension)
  • Normal or corrected-to-normal vision (for eye-tracking calibration)
  • Willingness to participate in all therapy and assessment sessions
  • Signed written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current use of psychotropic medication
  • Current or past psychotherapy within the last 6 months
  • Diagnosis of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or substance use disorder
  • Neurological disorders (e.g., epilepsy, traumatic brain injury)
  • Active suicidal ideation or recent suicide attempt (within past 12 months)
  • Pregnancy (due to possible changes in physiological readings)
  • Any uncorrected visual impairments or eye conditions preventing eye-tracking
  • Presence of metal implants or devices incompatible with EEG recording
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

DSM diagnostic criteria

The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT) Group

    Participants in this arm will receive 12 sessions of manualized Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT), each lasting 60 minutes, delivered weekly over 12 weeks. The therapy includes psychoeducation, cognitive restructuring, exposure and response prevention (ERP), mindfulness strategies, and attentional retraining related to appearance concerns.

    Behavioral: Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy

  • No intervention
    Waitlist Control Group

    Participants in this arm will receive no active intervention during the 12-week study period but will complete the same neurophysiological and psychometric assessments as the CBT group. After the final follow-up, they will be offered the CBT intervention if desired.

Interventions

  • BehavioralCognitive-Behavioral Therapy

    A structured 12-week psychotherapy protocol targeting maladaptive appearance-related beliefs and behaviors in individuals with Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD). The intervention involves individual sessions once per week (60 minutes) and incorporates techniques such as psychoeducation, cognitive restructuring, exposure and response prevention (ERP), mindfulness, and attentional retraining.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in EEG Responses to Appearance-Related Stimuli

    Electroencephalographic (EEG) responses to appearance-related stimuli will be analyzed as a composite neurophysiological outcome, integrating the following components: N170 (early facial processing), P300 (attention allocation), Late Positive Potential - LPP (emotional engagement), and Frontal Alpha Asymmetry (affective regulation). All EEG signals will be recorded using a 14-channel EEG system and processed through synchronized pipelines in iMotions, MATLAB, and R. Each ERP component will be extracted, cleaned, and averaged across trials. Although individual metrics will be analyzed separately for exploratory purposes, the primary analytic approach will treat these variables as a conceptually unified outcome representing neurophysiological change. Statistical comparisons will be conducted using repeated-measures MANOVA and linear mixed-effects modeling to evaluate the impact of CBT over time.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Post-treatment)

  2. Change in Galvanic Skin Response (GSR) to Appearance-Related Stimuli

    Sympathetic nervous system activity will be measured using Galvanic Skin Response (GSR) during exposure to appearance-related stimuli. The outcome consists of two integrated components: Skin Conductance Level (SCL): baseline tonic arousal Skin Conductance Response (SCR): phasic reactivity to stimuli Both components will be simultaneously recorded using the iMotions platform, preprocessed in MATLAB, and statistically analyzed using R. Though each parameter will be evaluated individually, the primary outcome represents a composite measure of autonomic arousal regulation. CBT is expected to result in decreased SCR amplitude and faster return to baseline SCL, reflecting improved stress regulation.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Post-treatment)

  3. Change in Visual Attention Patterns During Facial Stimulus Exposure

    Visual attention responses will be measured using eye-tracking during exposure to self-related and appearance-based stimuli. The outcome includes the following integrated metrics: Fixation Duration (ms) Fixation Count (number) Saccade Frequency (number per second) Pupil Dilation (mm) These metrics will be collected via a Gazepoint GP3 eye-tracker, synchronized through iMotions, and analyzed in R and MATLAB. While each measure will be analyzed individually in secondary analyses, this outcome collectively reflects attentional allocation and hypervigilance. CBT is expected to reduce biased attention toward self-perceived flaws and normalize gaze patterns.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Post-treatment)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in BDD Symptom Severity: Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Body Dysmorphic Disorder / YBOCS-BDD

    The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD-YBOCS) is a clinician-administered rating scale that assesses the severity of BDD-related obsessions and compulsions. It includes 12 items, each rated from 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (extreme symptoms), resulting in a total score range of 0 to 48. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

  2. Change in Body Image Disturbance Questionaire (BIDQ)

    he Body Image Disturbance Questionnaire (BIDQ) is a 7-item self-report questionnaire that assesses dissatisfaction with appearance, associated distress, and functional impairment. Each item is rated on a Likert scale from 1 to 5, with total scores ranging from 7 to 35. Higher scores reflect more severe body image disturbance.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

  3. Change in Emotion Regulation Questionaire (ERQ)

    The Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ) is a 10-item self-report questionnaire measuring two emotion regulation strategies: cognitive reappraisal (6 items) and expressive suppression (4 items). Each item is rated on a 7-point Likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). Subscale scores range from 6 to 42 (reappraisal) and 4 to 28 (suppression). Higher scores reflect greater use of the respective strategy.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

  4. Change in Depressive Symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory-II)

    The Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) is a 21-item self-report questionnaire designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms over the past two weeks. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale from 0 to 3, resulting in a total score range of 0 to 63. Higher scores indicate greater severity of depressive symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

  5. Change in Anxiety Symptoms (Beck Anxiety Inventory)

    The Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) is a 21-item self-report questionnaire designed to assess the severity of anxiety symptoms experienced during the past week. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (severely), yielding a total score range of 0 to 63. Higher scores reflect more severe anxiety symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Üsküdar University
    Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data (IPD) that support the primary and secondary outcomes of this trial (including EEG, GSR, eye-tracking data, and psychometric measures such as BDD-YBOCS, BIDQ, ERQ, BDI-II, and BAI) will be shared with qualified researchers upon reasonable request.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Clinical study report

Access criteria: Qualified researchers with a methodologically sound proposal and ethical approval may request access. Requests should be submitted to the corresponding author. Data will be shared through secure institutional platforms, and users must agree to terms of use that ensure participant confidentiality.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jun 2025 to primary completion in Oct 2025, 4 months.

Of 26 interventional studies with no phase under Body Dysmorphic Disorders, half reached primary completion within 21 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 34. This study's 4 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 2, 2025
First posted
Jun 11, 2025
StartActual
Jun 1, 2025
Primary completionActual
Oct 15, 2025
CompletionActual
Nov 25, 2025
Last update
Apr 16, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 16, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07016204
Lead sponsor
Istanbul Nisantasi University
Collaborators
Uskudar University, Beykoz University
Responsible party
Metin Çınaroğlu (Director, Istanbul Nisantasi University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 11, 2025
Start date
Jun 1, 2025
Primary completion
Oct 15, 2025
Completion
Nov 25, 2025
Last update
Apr 16, 2026

Study contacts

Selami Varol Ülker, Phd
study director · Üsküdar University
Gökben Hızlı Sayar, Prof
study chair · Üsküdar University
Eda Yılmazer, Phd
principal investigator · Beykoz University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion