ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07010484REMAP PMRUpdated Oct 1, 2025

Using Novel Imaging to Rethink Diagnostic and Treatment Strategies for Polymyalgia Rheumatica

An observational study in Polymyalgia Rheumatica (PMR), sponsored by Kresten Krarup Keller. Recruiting at 7 sites in Denmark. Open to participants aged 50 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-10-01.

Sponsored by Kresten Krarup Keller · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2025; still recruiting 1 year 2 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
149
Ages
50 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is the most common chronic inflammatory rheumatic disease among the elderly and is characterized by proximal extremity pain and fatigue. Treatment with prednisolone carries several significant adverse effects, and it is therefore essential to avoid unnecessary treatment. However, clinical diagnosis and even imaging such as positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) has low diagnostic accuracy, which decrease after start of prednisolone. The purpose is to evaluate a new method to diagnose PMR with PET/CT using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for informing the interpretation of PET in 111 patients suspected of PMR at baseline and after 8 weeks prednisolone treatment. In addition, a treatment initiation strategy guided by clinical diagnosis combined with PET will be evaluated in 100 patients with newly diagnosed PMR.

02

Conditions studied

  • Polymyalgia Rheumatica (PMR)

Keywords

  • polymyalgia rheumatica
  • imaging
  • diagnosis
  • PET/CT
  • PET/MRI
03

In context

Polymyalgia Rheumatica

68 studies on the registry are indexed under Polymyalgia Rheumatica; 22 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 149 is above the median of 133 across 27 observational studies indexed under Polymyalgia Rheumatica.

Browse Polymyalgia Rheumatica studies →

Lead sponsor

Kresten Krarup Keller is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patients suspected of and diagnosed with polymyalgia rheumatica are included.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients suspected of PMR seen at the Department of Rheumatology/internal medicine in Aarhus, Silkeborg, Horsens, Gødstrup, Randers, and Svendborg.
  2. Age above 50.
  3. Proximal extremity pain.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Oral, intravenous, intra-articular or intramuscular within the last 2 months.
  2. Previous prednisolone treatment for GCA/PMR.
  3. Unable to give consent.
  4. Proximal extremity pain duration for more than one year.
  5. Symptoms of GCA (headache, scalp tenderness, jaw or tongue claudication, vision disturbances attributable to GCA, limb claudication).
  6. Active malignant cancers within the last 5 years (except basal cell carcinoma).
  7. Other known inflammatory rheumatic diseases (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis, polymyositis, spondyloarthritis, psoriatic arthritis, gout).
  8. Uncontrolled diseases (e.g. severe active asthma, cardiac disease with class IV)
  9. For MRI: Implants contraindicating MRI and >150 kg.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
149 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients with and suspected of polymyalgia rheumatica

    The study evaluate a new method to diagnose PMR with PET/CT using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for informing the interpretation of PET in 111 patients suspected of polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) at baseline and after 8 weeks prednisolone treatment. In addition, a treatment initiation strategy guided by clinical diagnosis combined with PET will be evaluated in 100 patients with newly diagnosed PMR (estimated 64 from the 111 patients with suspected PMR, and additionally 38 diagnosed with PMR of which approximately 34 will have PMR without concurrent giant cell arteritis). Patients with a clinical diagnosis of PMR and a negative PET will not be started in routine treatment, but receive intramuscular glucocorticoids, which can be followed by oral prednisolone 15 mg tapered during a maximum of 3 month after diagnosis at discretion of the investigator.

    Diagnostic Test: PET/MRI · Diagnostic Test: PET/CT with 18-FDG

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testPET/MRI

    PET/MRI at baseline and week 8

  • Diagnostic testPET/CT with 18-FDG

    PET/CT in patients not receiving PET/MRI

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinical diagnosis of PMR after 1 year and a positive baseline [18F]FDG-PET scan, with MRI findings used to support interpretation of the PET evaluation.

    sensitivity and specificity of \[18F\]FDG-PET/CT using PET combined with MRI to inform the interpretation of the PET evaluation, using the clinical diagnosis at 1 year as reference standard.

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. A clinical diagnosis of PMR at baseline and a negative PET not requiring glucocorticoids for more than 3 months during the first year.

    proportion of patients with a positive clinical diagnosis and a negative PET not requiring glucocorticoids for more than 3 months during the first year.

    Time frame: Baseline to 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Clinical diagnosis of PMR after 1 year and a positive [18F]FDG-PET/MRI at baseline.

    Sensitivity and specificity of \[18F\]FDG-PET/MRI at baseline for diagnosing PMR, using the clinical diagnosis at 1 year as reference standard.

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Clinical diagnosis of PMR after 1 year and a positive MRI at baseline.

    Sensitivity and specificity of MRI at baseline for diagnosing PMR, using the clinical diagnosis at 1 year as reference standard.

    Time frame: Baseline

  3. Circular, focal, and/or cylindrical [18F]FDG-uptake patterns associated to synovitis, bursitis, and tendinitis/tenosynovitis in the shoulders and hips on MRI or ultrasound.

    Investigate if circular, focal and cylindrical \[18F\]FDG-uptake patterns correspond to synovitis, bursitis and tendinitis using MRI and ultrasound for confirmation.

    Time frame: Baseline

  4. Clinical diagnosis of PMR after 1 year and synovitis, bursitis, and tendinitis/tenosynovits in the shoulders and hips.

    Prevalence of synovitis, tendinitis/tenosynovitis and bursitis in PMR and differential diagnoses.

    Time frame: Baseline

  5. Clinical diagnosis of PMR after 1 year and extra-capsular PMR diagnosed using [18F]FDG-PET/MRI.

    Proportion of patients with capsular and extra-capsular PMR.

    Time frame: Baseline

  6. Extra-capsular PMR and remission after 2 or 4 weeks.

    Time to remission in patients with extra-capsular involvement compared to PMR patients with capsular involvement.

    Time frame: Baseline to 4 weeks

  7. Extra-capsular PMR with relapse and remaining in prednisolone treatment within the first year, first 3 years, and first 5 years.

    Proportion of patients with capsular and extra-capsular PMR who experience relapse and remain in prednisolone treatment within the first year, first 3 years, and first 5 years.

    Time frame: Baseline to 5 years

  8. Clinical diagnosis of PMR after 1 year and a positive [18F]FDG-PET/CT after 8 weeks of prednisolone treatment, with MRI findings used to support PET interpretation.

    Sensitivity and specificity of \[18F\]FDG-PET after 8 weeks of prednisolone treatment using PET combined with MRI to inform the interpretation of PET scans for diagnosing PMR, using the clinical diagnosis at 1 year as reference standard.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  9. Clinical diagnosis of PMR after 1 year and a positive [18F]FDG-PET/MRI after 8 weeks of prednisolone treatment.

    Sensitivity and specificity of \[18F\]FDG-PET/MRI after 8 weeks of prednisolone treatment for diagnosing PMR, using the clinical diagnosis at 1 year as reference standard.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  10. Clinical diagnosis of PMR after 1 year and a positive MRI after 8 weeks of prednisolone treatment.

    Sensitivity and specificity of MRI after 8 weeks of prednisolone treatment for diagnosing PMR, using the clinical diagnosis at 1 year as reference standard.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  11. Specific baseline clinical information and baseline, 8 weeks, or changes after 8 weeks of prednisolone treatment on [18F]FDG-PET/MRI findings, and the prediction of relapse and prednisolone-free remission after 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years.

    Investigate whether clinical information or \[18F\]FDG-PET/MRI findings at baseline, 8 weeks, or changes after 8 weeks of prednisolone treatment can predict relapse and prednisolone-free remission after 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years.

    Time frame: Baseline to 5 years

  12. Specific baseline clinical information and baseline, 8 weeks, or changes after 8 weeks of prednisolone treatment on MRI findings, and the prediction of relapse and prednisolone-free remission after 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years.

    Investigate whether clinical information or MRI findings at baseline, 8 weeks, or changes after 8 weeks of prednisolone treatment can predict relapse and prednisolone-free remission after 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years.

    Time frame: Baseline to 5 years

  13. Specific baseline clinical information and baseline, 8 weeks, or changes after 8 weeks of prednisolone treatment on ultrasonography findings, and the prediction of relapse and prednisolone-free remission after 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years.

    Investigate whether clinical information and ultrasonography findings at baseline, 8 weeks, or changes after 8 weeks of prednisolone treatment can predict relapse and prednisolone-free remission after 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years.

    Time frame: Baseline to 5 years

  14. Baseline characteristics for patients with a positive PET scan and a clinical diagnosis of PMR at baseline.

    Compare baseline characteristics between patients with a positive PET scan and a clinical diagnosis of PMR and those with a negative PET scan and a clinical diagnosis of PMR.

    Time frame: Baseline

  15. Baseline MRI findings for patients with a positive PET scan and a clinical diagnosis of PMR at baseline.

    Compare MRI findings between patients with a positive PET scan and a clinical diagnosis of PMR and those with a negative PET scan and a clinical diagnosis of PMR.

    Time frame: Baseline

  16. Baseline characteristics for patients with a clinical diagnosis of PMR at baseline and a negative PET scan not receiving glucocorticoids for more than 3 months during the first year.

    Investigate if baseline characteristics can predict which patients with a clinical PMR diagnosis will have a negative PET and require glucocorticoids for no longer than 3 months during the first year.

    Time frame: Baseline to 1 year

  17. Clinical diagnosis of PMR after 1 year and symptomatic or asymptomatic (subclinical) GCA at diagnosis, week 8, year 1, year 3, and year 5 in patients diagnosed with PMR.

    Prevalence of symptomatic and asymptomatic (subclinical) GCA at diagnosis, week 8, year 1, year 3 and year 5 in patients diagnosed with PMR.

    Time frame: Baseline to 5 years

  18. Clinical diagnosis of PMR after 1 year and positive ultrasound findings around the shoulders and hips at baseline, week 8, year 1, year 3, and year 5.

    Changes in ultrasound findings around the shoulders and hips during 1 year, 3 years and 5 years.

    Time frame: Baseline to 5 years

  19. Physical activity evaluated with step count using the physical activity tracking application over the course of one year in patients with PMR.

    Changes in physical activity during the first year after diagnosis.

    Time frame: Baseline to 1 year

  20. Decreased physical activity during doctor-diagnosed relapses of PMR.

    Investigate if relapses of PMR can be detected with physical activity tracking.

    Time frame: Baseline to 1 year

  21. Fulfilling the criteria for fibromyalgia at baseline and after 1, 3, and 5 years.

    Proportion of PMR patients fulfilling the criteria for fibromyalgia after 1 year, 3 years and 5 years.

    Time frame: Baseline to 5 years

07

Study locations

2 of 7 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — All IPD that underlie results in the publications

Supporting information: Study protocol

Time frame: Starting 6 months after publication, and 2 years.

Access criteria: By resonably request.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Aug 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Aug 2028, 36 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 30, 2025
First posted
Jun 8, 2025
StartActual
Aug 21, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Aug 31, 2028
CompletionEst.
Aug 31, 2032
Last update
Oct 1, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 1, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07010484
Lead sponsor
Kresten Krarup Keller
Collaborators
Randers Regional Hospital, Central Jutland Regional Hospital, Gødstrup Hospital, Svendborg Hospital, Odense University Hospital, Regionshospitalet Horsens
Responsible party
Kresten Krarup Keller (Associate professor, Aarhus University Hospital) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jun 8, 2025
Start date
Aug 21, 2025
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 31, 2032 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 1, 2025

Study contacts

Kresten K Keller, MD, PhD
Contact
krekel@rm.dk
+45 40384984
Kresten K Keller, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion