CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07010185RCTUpdated Jun 8, 2025

Effect of Supervised Versus Unsupervised Strength Training on Balance and Functional Performance Among Post Stroke Ambulatory Patients

An interventional study of home based exercise in Cerebro-vascular Accident, sponsored by Majmaah University. Completed at 1 site in Saudi Arabia. Open to participants aged 25 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-06-08.

Sponsored by Majmaah University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2025, registered May 2025).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
61
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
25 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Objective:

This single-blinded randomized controlled trial compared the effects of supervised clinic-based versus unsupervised home-based balance and strength training on functional outcomes in ambulatory post-stroke patients.

Methods:

This study implemented a single-blinded; two-arm randomized control approach to evaluate rehabilitation interventions for stroke patients. It was conducted at the Prince Sultan Military Medical City in the Riyadh region, which features a specialized physiotherapy center for neurology patients.

Design: RCT with two parallel arms (N=48; 24/group). Participants: Ambulatory stroke survivors (1-24 months post-stroke) aged 25-65 years.

Interventions:

Supervised group: 45-minute therapist-led sessions (3x/week for 12 weeks), including strength/balance exercises.

Unsupervised group: Identical exercises performed at home with remote guidance (videos, diaries, follow-up calls).

Outcomes: Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Physiological Cost Index (PCI), 6-minute walk test (6MWT), and Short Form-36 (SF-36) at baseline and 12 weeks.

Read the detailed description

Stroke, often referred to as a cerebrovascular accident, is a significant global health concern and a leading cause of long-term disability, particularly among the elderly. Stroke occurs when there is a sudden disruption of blood flow to the brain, causing the death of cerebral tissue [1]. Globally, stroke affects around 15 million individuals each year, resulting in 5 million deaths and 5 million cases of permanent disability, making it a leading cause of mortality and morbidity (World Health Organization). In Europe alone, there are 41.5 million new stroke cases each year, with only 15% of patients achieving full recovery [2]. In Saudi Arabia it remains a significant health concern with an incidence of 29.8 cases per 100,000 individuals annually [3]. The incidence rates of stroke vary regionally, with 15.1 per 100,000 in Jizan city and up to 29.8 per 100,000 in the Eastern region and urban areas experiencing higher rates than rural ones [4, 5]. Although these rates are lower than rates in many high-income countries, there is a pressing need for a nationwide stroke registry to enhance healthcare services for survivors [3]. Ischemic strokes are the most common subtype, while hemorrhagic strokes, particularly those related to hypertension, also present significant challenges [6]. The risk factors for stroke in the Saudi population include hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, obesity, physical inactivity, heredity, and smoking [7]. These factors contribute significantly to the overall burden of stroke and highlight the need for targeted prevention strategies.

Stroke leads to significant mobility challenges, balance difficulties, and a diminished quality of life, making it the leading cause of walking and balance disabilities in older adults [8]. Approximately 75% of stroke survivors experience mobility limitations each year, with 40% requiring assistance for walking [9]. Among those who regain some independence, 60% face challenges with community ambulation [10]. The American Stroke Association notes that 87% of strokes are ischemic, causing symptoms such as paralysis, balance loss, and post-stroke cramping [11]. Many post-stroke individuals encounter substantial impairments in muscle strength, balance, and postural control due to decreased sensory feedback and weaker motor responses, which increase the risk of falls and functional limitations [12]. Balance issues often arise from reduced muscle power, coordination deficits, and impaired sensory integration. Motor deficits, including hemiparesis, affect about 80% of stroke survivors [13]. These balance problems stem from challenges in proprioception, trunk muscle strength, and coordination, which can restrict independence and lead to social isolation and depression [14]. A study by Rudberg et al. (2020) emphasized that balance and walking difficulties are major concerns for stroke patients, underscoring the necessity for effective rehabilitation strategies [15].

Rehabilitation programs focusing on strength and balance training are essential for improving functional outcomes. Evidence suggests that these interventions can enhance ambulation, mobility, and overall functional performance in stroke survivors [16, 17]. While supervised training under the guidance of a physical therapist has been shown to be effective, many stroke survivors and their caregivers prefer home-based exercises due to comfort, a sense of autonomy and lack of access to the training centers. Despite rapid changes, accessing consistent professional healthcare support remains crucial in Saudi Arabia. Patients face challenges due to limited resources, staffing shortages, and barriers that hinder recovery. Additionally, cultural perceptions and social stigma surrounding disability and gender segregation affects the willingness to seek help and follow rehabilitation programs, complicating the recovery efforts [18-20]. This study aims to investigate the comparative effects of supervised versus unsupervised strength and balance training on balance and functional performance in ambulatory stroke patients. The hypothesis is that compared to supervised training, unsupervised training under remote guidance can also achieve significant improvements in post-stroke patients. This research is crucial for developing effective rehabilitation protocols that cater to the needs of stroke survivors, particularly those who may have difficulty accessing consistent professional support. Understanding the impact of different training modalities on stroke recovery will help inform best practices in rehabilitation and ultimately enhance the quality of life for individuals living with the after effects of stroke.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cerebro-vascular Accident

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • cerebrovascular accident
  • Stroke
  • Post Stroke Ambulatory Patients
03

In context

Stroke

7,286 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,007 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 61 is above the median of 50 across 5,369 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Majmaah University is the lead sponsor of 24 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
25 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • participants aged 25 to 65 who had suffered a stroke between one and 24 months prior and were medically stable without complications were screened to be included in this study.

They should have scored 3 or lower on the Modified Ashworth Scale for muscle spasticity and reported lower limb pain levels of 5 or less on a 10-point visual analog scale.

They should have been able to tolerate 45 minutes of physical activity, including rest period, and walk independently for at least 40 meters, with or without assistive devices.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those with a history of previous strokes, other neurological conditions, mobility issues, severe medical conditions, or significant visual field loss were excluded.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
61 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Supervised training

    supervised strength training

    Behavioral: home based exercise

Interventions

  • Behavioralhome based exercise

    warm-up Exercises (5 minutes), dynamic Stretching (5 to 10 repetitions), strengthening exercises focused on lower limb muscles, such as bridging, clamshells, and various leg exercises (5-10 repetitions across 2-3 sets, based on patient tolerance)

    Also known as: stretching, warm up

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Berg balance scale

    Berg Balance Scale assesses patient's balance through 14 tasks, scored from 0 to 4. A change of 4 points indicates a significant improvement in balance, particularly in elderly populations

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  2. Physiological cost index

    Physiological Cost Index, evaluates the heart rate during rest and walking to assess the physiological cost of ambulation. It is calculated as the difference between walking heart rate and resting heart rate divided by the average walking speed.

    Time frame: 12 week

  3. 6-minute walk distance test

    6-minute walk distance test, developed by the American Thoracic Society, measures aerobic capacity and endurance by recording the distance walked in six minutes, providing insights into functional capacity across various physiological systems

    Time frame: 12 Week

  4. Short form-36 questionnaire

    36-Item Short Form Survey is a widely-used questionnaire assesses health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical and emotional well-being. It is a validated tool for measuring overall health status.

    Time frame: 12 Week

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Majmaah University
    Al-Majmaah, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Data will be available to the principal investigator and furnished upon request.

Supporting information: Icf

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 8, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07010185
Lead sponsor
Majmaah University
Responsible party
Shahnaz Hasan, PhD (Associate Professor, Majmaah University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 8, 2025
Start date
Jan 30, 2025
Primary completion
May 15, 2025
Completion
May 15, 2025
Last update
Jun 8, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion