CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07003217VR-STAMPUpdated Jun 24, 2025

The Effects of Virtual Reality-Based Practical Training on Physical Therapy Students

An interventional study of Virtual Reality-based practical education and Video Watching-based practical education in Healthy Volunteers - Male and Female, sponsored by Sahmyook University. Completed at 1 site in South Korea. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-06-24.

Sponsored by Sahmyook University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2024, registered May 2025).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
52
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of virtual reality (VR)-based education and video watching-based education on physical therapy students' learning satisfaction, technology acceptance, learning motivation, and learning achievement during musculoskeletal special test training. As technology continues to evolve, tech-assisted learning has emerged as a notable approach in modern education. Among these technologies, VR has gained significant attention for its ability to provide immersive and interactive learning environments for both educators and students. VR applications have expanded into the medical field and are increasingly integrated into health science education. Recently, VR tools have moved beyond desktop-based systems to more accessible platforms like mobile apps and head-mounted displays. In medical education, 3D environments enable engaging and self-directed learning that helps learners understand anatomical structures and build confidence in practical skills. In physical therapy, practical education is important, as therapists must accurately choose and perform special tests. Studies suggest that VR-based training is effective in practical education in physical therapy. Although VR has been applied in rehabilitation for stroke and osteoarthritis patients, VR-based educational research targeting undergraduate physical therapy students is lacking. This study hypothesizes that VR-based practical education is more effective than traditional video watching-based education in improving students' learning satisfaction, technology acceptance, learning motivation, and learning achievement. Participants will be randomly assigned to a VR-based experimental group or a video watching-based control group.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of virtual reality (VR)-based practical education for college students in the department of physical therapy on learning satisfaction, technology acceptance, learning motivation, and learning achievement. The four specialized musculoskeletal tests were the pronator teres test, Hawkins Kennedy test, Yergason's test, and Neer's test. The participants of this study were students from the department of physical therapy at S University in Seoul, South Korea, and were classified into 28 participants in the experimental group using VR-based practical education and 24 participants in the control group using video watching-based practical education through random assignment. Both groups participated in the study for the same period of 1 day, a total of 1 time, for 10 to 15 minutes. When selecting participants for the study, a simulator sickness questionnaire (SSQ) was conducted along with general characteristics to evaluate the symptoms of motion sickness, and one or more of the 16 items were excluded from the study if they were at a 'severe level'. Pre- and post-surveys were administered on learning satisfaction, technology acceptance, learning motivation, and learning achievement.

02

Conditions studied

  • Healthy Volunteers - Male and Female

Keywords

  • virtual reality
  • learning satisfaction
  • technology acceptance
  • learning motivation
  • learning achievement
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Sahmyook University is the lead sponsor of 42 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • students enrolled in the Department of Physical Therapy at S University in Seoul, South Korea
  • individuals who had received prior instruction on the four tests included in the study
  • those who did not report any of the 16 SSQ items at the "severe" symptom level
  • those who fully understood the purpose and procedures of the study and agreed to participate by providing informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals who have not learned about the four tests included in the study
  • those with health issues that limit the use of VR equipment
  • those who do not consent to participate in the study
  • those who report 'severe' symptoms on any of the 16 items of the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ)
  • individuals with disabilities, or pregnant women
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
52 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Virtual Reality-based practical education

    Before the start of the experiment, the participants in the experimental group were provided with instructions on the usage and safety precautions of the head-mounted display (HMD; Pico 4 Enterprise, Pico Technology, China, 2022). All participants were given a disposable facial hygiene cover for the HMD to ensure hygienic use, and those who wore glasses were also instructed on how to properly wear the device. Each participant adjusted the HMD to fit their head size and used hand controllers to sequentially select and perform four target musculoskeletal special tests: the Pronator Teres Test, Hawkins-Kennedy Test, Yergason's Test, and Neer's Test. Each VR video lasted approximately 3 to 4 minutes and was designed to allow 180° rotation. Participants engaged in the VR training once per day. After the session, post-tests were conducted to assess learning satisfaction, technology acceptance, learning motivation, and learning achievement.

    Behavioral: Virtual Reality-based practical education

  • Active comparator
    Video Watching-based practical education

    The control group received the same musculoskeletal special test content through traditional video-watching instruction. The participants watched the videos while seated individually in a laboratory at S University. Each video lasted approximately 3 to 4 minutes, and the training was conducted once per day. Pre- and post-tests were administered to evaluate learning satisfaction, technology acceptance, learning motivation, and learning achievement.

    Behavioral: Video Watching-based practical education

Interventions

  • BehavioralVirtual Reality-based practical education

    VR-based practical education is an interactive learning method that utilizes virtual reality, where participants engage in a 3D environment for learning.

  • BehavioralVideo Watching-based practical education

    Video Watching-based practical education is a passive learning method, where information is delivered solely through video viewing.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Learning Satisfaction

    The learning satisfaction scale consists of 19 items in total and is divided into three parts. It consists of three items on experience with the system, seven items on feelings about the system, and nine items on satisfaction with the learning approach. The reliability of the learning satisfaction survey used in this experiment is .91 with a cronbach 's α value. The learning satisfaction survey items were composed of a 7-point Likert scale.

    Time frame: Immediately before and after intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Technology Acceptance

    Technology acceptance consists of usefulness and ease of use of VR educational technology, and the questionnaire consists of 6 and 7 questions, respectively, for a total of 13 questions. The reliability is Cronbach 's α value of .95 for usefulness and .94 for ease of use. The technology acceptance questionnaire items consisted of a 7-point Likert scale.

    Time frame: Immediately before and after intervention

  2. Learning Motivation

    Learning motivation was designed as a questionnaire with reference to previous studies. It consists of a total of 7 items , including questions about the importance and value of the topic. The items were reorganized to be appropriate for this study with reference to previous papers. The reliability is .79 with Cronbach 's α value. The learning motivation questionnaire items were designed on a 7-point Likert scale.

    Time frame: Immediately before and after intervention

  3. Learning Achievement

    Learning achievement was assessed by a 12-item quiz to assess students' understanding of academics. The quiz items were validated by a doctoral degree holder and an educational expert with extensive experience in physical therapy practice education. The pre- and post-tests of learning achievement consisted of the same items. Participants were undergraduate students in the Department of Physical Therapy who had studied four musculoskeletal special tests: the Pronator Teres Test, the Hawkins-Kennedy Test, the Yergason's Test, and the Neer 's Test. They were given three questions on each test. The 12 questions on the learning achievement quiz consisted of short answer or multiple choice questions.

    Time frame: Immediately before and after intervention

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Sahmyook University
    Seoul, Dongdaemoon-gu 01795, South Korea
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — The research results will be published through a journal.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 24, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07003217
Lead sponsor
Sahmyook University
Responsible party
Hyoshil Yoon (Ph.D. Student and Principal Investigator, Sahmyook University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 4, 2025
Start date
Apr 16, 2024
Primary completion
May 22, 2024
Completion
May 22, 2024
Last update
Jun 24, 2025

Study contacts

Hyoshil Yoon, Ph.D. Candidate
principal investigator · Sahmyook University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion