ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07002814BetalactavilleUpdated May 6, 2026

Direct Oral Challenges in Private Practice Setting to Delabeling Children With Beta-lactam Allergy

An observational study in Allergy, sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged Up to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-06.

Sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2026, 5 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
200
Ages
Up to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility of direct oral challenge performed in private practice setting for children with suspected benign delayed allergy to beta-lactams.

The results of this study could help establish recommendations for conducting direct oral challenge in primary care settings to delabeling children with benign delayed reactions to beta-lactams.

Read the detailed description

Approximately 10% of children are labeled as allergic to beta-lactams (BL). Consequently, they receive alternative antibiotics with a broader spectrum but lower efficacy, leading to increased infectious morbidity and mortality, a higher risk of colonization with antibiotic-resistant bacteria, and elevated healthcare costs. However, true BL allergy is only confirmed in 5-10% of cases. Therefore, an essential challenge is to promptly identify non-allergic children to prevent unnecessary medical restrictions.

The most common reactions are delayed and benign. Current guidelines recommend evaluating these reactions through direct oral challenge (DOC) without prior allergological assessment, as traditional diagnostic methods, particularly skin tests, have poor sensitivity in this context. However, the optimal setting for conducting these tests remains debated, particularly regarding whether they can be initiated in hospital settings or private medical practices.

To date, over 8,300 DOCs have been performed in children, predominantly in hospital-based consultations. These tests have demonstrated a favorable safety profile, with positive DOC reactions often being of the same nature and less severe than the initial reported reaction. While many physicians perform DOCs in private practice, data on their use in pediatric populations remain scarce.

The primary objective of this study is to assess the feasibility of DOCs conducted in private medical practices for children with suspected benign delayed allergy to BL

02

Conditions studied

  • Allergy

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Beta-lactams
  • Allerg
  • Allergology
  • Direct oral challenge
03

In context

Hypersensitivity

1,055 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypersensitivity; 149 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is above the median of 166 across 327 observational studies indexed under Hypersensitivity.

Browse Hypersensitivity studies →

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris is the lead sponsor of 3,592 studies on the registry; 1,033 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Child who underwent a direct oral challenge in a private practice setting for suspected mild delayed allergy to a beta-lactam

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Population: Children's age between 0 and 17 years
  • Child who has undergone a direct oral challenge in a private medical practice and a follow-up consultation within 7 to 14 days for suspected delayed allergy to amoxicillin +/- clavulanate or cefpodoxime or cefixime with the following characteristics:
  • delayed reaction (onset > 1 hour after treatment start),
  • mild reaction (isolated urticaria or Maculopapular exanthema),
  • Absence of warning signs suggestive of a severe cutaneous adverse reaction (erythroderma, presence of bullae, vesicles, pustules, target lesions, involvement of oral, genital, or ocular mucosa, facial edema, general condition impairment, organ failure, duration > 7 days).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Informed children or holders of parental authority objecting to the use of patient data in the study.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Children requiring a direct oral challenge (DOC)

    Children previously labeled with suspected beta-lactam allergy, requiring a direct oral challenge (DOC) to confirm or rule out true hypersensitivity

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility of direct oral challenge (DOC) for beta-lactam allergy assessment

    Demonstrate the feasibility of direct oral challenges (DOCs) performed in private medical practices for the evaluation of delayed and benign reactions to beta-lactams in children by collecting the amount of positive and negative DOC results and benign reactions description.

    Time frame: Day 14

Secondary outcomes

  1. Negative and positive tests reaction nature comparison

    Collect and compare the nature of reactions between children with positive and negative direct oral challenge

    Time frame: Day 14

  2. Negative and positive tests reaction chronology comparison

    Collect and compare chronology of reactions between children with positive and negative direct oral challenge.

    Time frame: Day 14

  3. Negative and positive tests reaction duration comparison

    Collect and compare duration of reactions between children with positive and negative direct oral challenge.

    Time frame: Day 14

  4. Negative and positive tests reactions index comparison

    Index reactions between children with positive and negative direct oral challenge.

    Time frame: Day 14

  5. Reactions nature in positive tests

    Collect and analyse the nature of reactions in positive direct oral challenge

    Time frame: Day 14

  6. Reactions extension in positive tests

    Collect and analyse the extension of reactions in positive direct oral challenge

    Time frame: Day 14

  7. Reactions duration in positive tests

    Collect and analyse the duration of reactions in positive direct oral challenge

    Time frame: Day 14

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Castells M, Khan DA, Phillips EJ. Penicillin Allergy. N Engl J Med. 2019 Dec 12;381(24):2338-2351. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1807761. No abstract available. PubMed 31826341 ↗
  • Khan DA, Banerji A, Blumenthal KG, Phillips EJ, Solensky R, White AA, Bernstein JA, Chu DK, Ellis AK, Golden DBK, Greenhawt MJ, Horner CC, Ledford D, Lieberman JA, Oppenheimer J, Rank MA, Shaker MS, Stukus DR, Wallace D, Wang J; Chief Editor(s):; Khan DA, Golden DBK, Shaker M, Stukus DR; Workgroup Contributors:; Khan DA, Banerji A, Blumenthal KG, Phillips EJ, Solensky R, White AA; Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters Reviewers:; Bernstein JA, Chu DK, Ellis AK, Golden DBK, Greenhawt MJ, Horner CC, Ledford D, Lieberman JA, Oppenheimer J, Rank MA, Shaker MS, Stukus DR, Wallace D, Wang J. Drug allergy: A 2022 practice parameter update. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022 Dec;150(6):1333-1393. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2022.08.028. Epub 2022 Sep 17. No abstract available. PubMed 36122788 ↗
  • Gomes ER, Brockow K, Kuyucu S, Saretta F, Mori F, Blanca-Lopez N, Ott H, Atanaskovic-Markovic M, Kidon M, Caubet JC, Terreehorst I; ENDA/EAACI Drug Allergy Interest Group. Drug hypersensitivity in children: report from the pediatric task force of the EAACI Drug Allergy Interest Group. Allergy. 2016 Feb;71(2):149-61. doi: 10.1111/all.12774. Epub 2015 Nov 17. PubMed 26416157 ↗
  • Sousa-Pinto B, Tarrio I, Blumenthal KG, Araujo L, Azevedo LF, Delgado L, Fonseca JA. Accuracy of penicillin allergy diagnostic tests: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021 Jan;147(1):296-308. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.04.058. Epub 2020 May 21. PubMed 32446963 ↗
  • Srisuwatchari W, Phinyo P, Chiriac AM, Saokaew S, Kulalert P. The Safety of the Direct Drug Provocation Test in Beta-Lactam Hypersensitivity in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023 Feb;11(2):506-518. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2022.11.035. Epub 2022 Dec 14. PubMed 36528293 ↗
  • Demoly P, Adkinson NF, Brockow K, Castells M, Chiriac AM, Greenberger PA, Khan DA, Lang DM, Park HS, Pichler W, Sanchez-Borges M, Shiohara T, Thong BY. International Consensus on drug allergy. Allergy. 2014 Apr;69(4):420-37. doi: 10.1111/all.12350. PubMed 24697291 ↗
  • Chow TG, Patel G, Mohammed M, Johnson D, Khan DA. Delabeling penicillin allergy in a pediatric primary care clinic. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2023 May;130(5):667-669. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2023.01.034. Epub 2023 Feb 2. No abstract available. PubMed 36738783 ↗
  • Savic L, Ardern-Jones M, Avery A, Cook T, Denman S, Farooque S, Garcez T, Gold R, Jay N, Krishna MT, Leech S, McKibben S, Nasser S, Premchand N, Sandoe J, Sneddon J, Warner A. BSACI guideline for the set-up of penicillin allergy de-labelling services by non-allergists working in a hospital setting. Clin Exp Allergy. 2022 Oct;52(10):1135-1141. doi: 10.1111/cea.14217. Epub 2022 Sep 21. PubMed 36128691 ↗
  • Waldron JL, Hackett J, Chaung YL, Rodway P, Clark M, Trubiano JA, Chua KYL. Oral penicillin challenge in adult community practice and primary care in Australia. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023 Dec;11(12):3786-3788.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.08.013. Epub 2023 Aug 10. No abstract available. PubMed 37572750 ↗
  • Duong TA, Valeyrie-Allanore L, Wolkenstein P, Chosidow O. Severe cutaneous adverse reactions to drugs. Lancet. 2017 Oct 28;390(10106):1996-2011. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30378-6. Epub 2017 May 2. PubMed 28476287 ↗
  • Jaoui A, Delalande D, Siouti S, Benoist G, Seve E, Ponvert C, Scheinmann P, Faour H, Neuraz A, Garcelon N, Delacourt C, Lezmi G. Safety and cost effectiveness of supervised ambulatory drug provocation tests in children with mild non-immediate reactions to beta-lactams. Allergy. 2019 Dec;74(12):2482-2484. doi: 10.1111/all.13871. Epub 2019 May 31. No abstract available. PubMed 31087349 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Jun 2026; primary completion for Jun 2026, 0 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 29, 2025
First posted
Jun 4, 2025
StartEst.
Jun 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jun 2026
CompletionEst.
Jun 2027
Last update
May 6, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 6, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07002814
Collaborators
URC-CIC Paris Descartes Necker Cochin
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 4, 2025
Start date
Jun 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2027 (estimated)
Last update
May 6, 2026

Study contacts

Sebastien LE, MD
Contact
sebastien.le@aphp.fr
06 35 14 12 41 ext. +33
Gael Plastow
Contact
gael.plastow@aphp.fr
01 44 38 18 57 ext. +33
Sebastien LE, MD
principal investigator · Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion