ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06999018Updated May 31, 2025

Humeral Shaft Fractures : Outcomes of Straight Percutaneous Intramedullary Nailing With Dynamic Distal Locking

An observational study in COVID-19, Coronavirus Infections and Seroprevalence, sponsored by Centre Hospitalier de Saint-Denis. Completed at 1 site in France. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-31.

Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier de Saint-Denis · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
76
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study looks at how many healthcare workers at CHSD have developed antibodies against COVID-19 after the second and third waves of the pandemic and following vaccination. By testing blood samples, we want to understand how well healthcare workers are protected, which work areas might be more at risk, and how immunity changes over time after infection or vaccination.

02

Conditions studied

  • COVID-19
  • Coronavirus Infections
  • Seroprevalence
  • Vaccination
  • Health Care Workers
03

In context

COVID-19

7,774 studies on the registry are indexed under COVID-19; 482 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 76 is below the median of 260 across 3,188 observational studies indexed under COVID-19.

Browse COVID-19 studies →

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier de Saint-Denis is the lead sponsor of 45 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population consists of adult patients who underwent surgical treatment for closed, isolated, and displaced fractures of the humeral shaft. These patients were treated with percutaneous anterograde intramedullary nailing using dynamic distal locking between January 2008 and June 2018. The population includes both men and women, with a mean age of approximately 53 years. Only patients with fractures classified as type A, B, or C according to the AO/OTA classification and who were available for follow-up evaluation were included. Patients with open fractures, non-isolated or non-displaced fractures, or those lost to follow-up were excluded.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients operated between January 2008 and June 2018
  • Closed, isolated, displaced fractures of the humeral shaft
  • Treatment by percutaneous anterograde intramedullary nailing with dynamic distal locking
  • Availability for follow-up and evaluation (e.g., Constant score assessment in June 2018)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Open fractures
  • Fractures that are not isolated or not displaced
  • Patients lost to follow-up at the June 2018 evaluation (18 excluded)
  • Lack of Constant score evaluation (patients not reviewed)
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
76 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among healthcare workers at CHSD following COVID-19 vaccination and previous infection.

    Time frame: January 2008 - June 2018

07

Study locations

1 site
  • France
    Saint-Denis, France, France
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jan 2020 to primary completion in Jan 2021, 12 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 22, 2025
First posted
May 31, 2025
StartActual
Jan 1, 2020
Primary completionActual
Jan 1, 2021
CompletionActual
Jan 1, 2021
Last update
May 31, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 31, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06999018
Lead sponsor
Centre Hospitalier de Saint-Denis
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 31, 2025
Start date
Jan 1, 2020
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2021
Completion
Jan 1, 2021
Last update
May 31, 2025
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion