ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06988085CARLYMUpdated May 23, 2025

Impact of Lymphodepletion Regimen on the Response to CAR T-cells in Patients With With Relapsed/Refractory Large B-cell Lymphoma

An observational study in Large B Cell Lymphoma and CAR T Cell, sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-23.

Sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
42
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

CAR T cells therapy has transformed the prognostic of relapsed/refractory large B cells lymphomas. Relapse however is still high and multiple causes have been studied. CAR expansion seems to be necessary to for response and lymphodepletion type and exposure, notably to fludarabine, associated with expansion and response.

The aim of the study is to analyse prospectivaly Fludarabine and cyclophosphamide exposure and correlate exposure to expansion, therapeutic response and survival.

Read the detailed description

Currently, a standard dose of fludarabine and cyclophosphamide is administered according to the type of CAR T-cells used.

For Tisa-cel, a dose of 25 mg/m²/day of fludarabine is administered from Day -5 to Day -3, and a dose of 250 mg/m²/day of cyclophosphamide is administered from Day -5 to Day -3.

For Axi-cel, a dose of 30 mg/m²/day of fludarabine is administered from Day -5 to Day -3, and a dose of 500 mg/m²/day of cyclophosphamide is administered from Day -5 to Day -3.

For Liso-cel, a dose of 30 mg/m²/day of fludarabine is administered from Day -5 to Day -3, and a dose of 300 mg/m²/day of cyclophosphamide is administered from Day -5 to Day -3.

The administration of lymphodepletion is quite straightforward and follows a standard practice. Urinary tract protection is ensured by injecting Uromitexan just before cyclophosphamide, then at 3, 6, and 9 hours after the cyclophosphamide injection.

In all three cases, CAR T-cell infusion takes place on Day 0, following two days of monitoring without treatment.

The doses selected for each CAR T-cell therapy in the context of B-cell malignancies have been optimized based on pivotal studies (Locke 2019, Zhang 2020) up to market approval to achieve the best efficacy and an acceptable safety profile. Indeed, treatment doses have been adjusted due to severe adverse effects (grade 3-4 neurotoxicity, hypotension with shock and cardiac arrest, death; Kochenderfer 2015, Schuster 2017 and 2019, Geyer 2019), even though higher doses had shown better efficacy (Curran 2019).

Our study hypothesis is to prospectively analyze fludarabine exposure to propose, in the future, a personalized lymphodepletion dosing strategy to achieve better CAR T-cell expansion and, consequently, improved efficacy.

This will require hyperhydration with 3L of saline solution per 24 hours over three days, administration of fludarabine over 30 minutes, followed 30 minutes later by a 2-hour infusion of cyclophosphamide. Prevention of cyclophosphamide-induced urinary toxicity will be managed through Uromitexan injections before and at 3, 6, and 9 hours after cyclophosphamide administration, as per standard procedure.

According to study design, six blood samples will be collected, including a pre-dose sample within the hour before fludarabine administration, followed by samples at 30 minutes ±10 minutes, 1 hour ±15 minutes, 3 hours ±30 minutes, 7 hours ±1 hour, and 9 hours ±1 hour after the end of the fludarabine infusion. These samples will be taken longitudinally on days 1 and 3 of fludarabine and cyclophosphamide infusion (i.e., Day -5 and Day -3 before CAR T-cell administration on Day 0).

The concentrations of the circulating metabolite of fludarabine (F-ara-A) and the active metabolite of cyclophosphamide (phosphoramide mustard) will be quantified using a validated method according to European guidelines (EMEA 2012) via liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. All analyses will be centralized at the Biological Pharmacology Laboratory of Saint-Louis Hospital under the supervision of Dr. Laurianne Goldwirt.

Total exposure to F-ara-A (area under the concentration-time curve [AUC₀-∞]) will be determined using a population pharmacokinetic model (Langerhorst et al., 2019) with Bayesian estimation (NONMEM software). Exposure to phosphoramide mustard (AUC₀-7h) will be assessed using a non-compartmental approach (PKanalix software). Residual concentrations (T₀) will be measured on Day 3.

The analysis will focus on the level of exposure to lymphodepletion, with patients classified into two groups based on whether their exposure is optimal or not, meaning whether the measured dose is below or above the minimal optimal dose. Further analysis will evaluate CAR T-cell expansion, therapeutic response, patient survival, and toxicities (CRS, ICANS, cytopenia) within these two groups.

Additionally, we will assess HLA-DR expression on monocytes at inclusion, a factor recently identified as predictive of the response to lymphodepletion and CAR T-cell expansion (Bourbon 2022).

We will then assess the the impact of fludarabine exposure and cylophophamide exposure on therapeutic responses after CAR t cells therapy and their toxicities. Global response, complete response, and progression will be measured on month 1, month 3 and at one year. Overall survivall will be assessed throughout the study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Large B Cell Lymphoma
  • CAR T Cell

Keywords

  • Large B cell lymphoma
  • CAR T cell
  • Lymphodepletion
  • Fludarabine exposure
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris is the lead sponsor of 3,576 studies on the registry; 1,028 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult patients aged 18 and over treated with commercial CAR T-cells (Lisocabtagene maraleucel, Tisagenlecleucel, or Axicabtagene ciloleucel) for relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patient aged 18 years and older
  • Treated with commercial CAR T-cells (Lisocabtagene maraleucel, Tisagenlecleucel, or Axicabtagene ciloleucel), with standard lymphodepletion consisting of Fludarabine and Cyclophosphamide
  • Presenting with aggressive large B-cell lymphoma that is refractory or has relapsed after at least one line of treatment
  • Creatinine clearance > 50 ml/min (Cockcroft CKD-EPI)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Weight ≤ 50 kg
  • Out-of-specification reinfusion product
  • Individual participating in another study with an ongoing exclusion period at the time of inclusion
  • Person under guardianship or curatorship, or deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision
  • Patient's opposition to the study
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
42 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Adult patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

    Other: Blood sampling

Interventions

  • OtherBlood sampling

    Before and after fludarabine infusion

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Progression Free Survival

    One year after the CAR T therapy

    Time frame: At 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Global response

    Time frame: At 1 month

  2. Complete response

    Time frame: At 1 month

  3. Global response

    Time frame: At 3 months

  4. Complete response

    Time frame: At 3 months

  5. Overall survival

    Time frame: At 1 year

  6. CAR T specific toxixity assessment

    During CAR administration based on used classification (Classification Lee/ASCT 2019)

    Time frame: Up to 1 year

  7. CAR T specific toxixity assessment

    During CAR administration based on cytopenia grading

    Time frame: Up to 1 year

  8. CAR T cell expansion

    By flow cytometry/PCR

    Time frame: At day 0

  9. CAR T cell expansion

    By flow cytometry/PCR

    Time frame: At day 2

  10. CAR T cell expansion

    By flow cytometry/PCR

    Time frame: At day 4

  11. CAR T cell expansion

    By flow cytometry/PCR

    Time frame: At day 6

  12. CAR T cell expansion

    By flow cytometry/PCR

    Time frame: At day 8

  13. CAR T cell expansion

    By flow cytometry/PCR

    Time frame: At day 10

  14. CAR T cell expansion

    By flow cytometry/PCR

    Time frame: At day 30

  15. CAR T cell expansion

    By flow cytometry/PCR

    Time frame: At day 15

  16. HLA-DR expression

    Time frame: At day 0

  17. Compliance of autologous reconstitution

    Time frame: At 1 month

  18. Monitoring of autologous reconstitution

    Time frame: At 2 months

  19. Monitoring of autologous reconstitution

    Time frame: At 3 months

  20. Monitoring of autologous reconstitution

    Time frame: At 6 months

  21. Monitoring of autologous reconstitution

    Time frame: At 12 months

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for May 2025; primary completion for May 2027, 24 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 4, 2025
First posted
May 23, 2025
StartEst.
May 30, 2025
Primary completionEst.
May 30, 2027
CompletionEst.
May 30, 2027
Last update
May 23, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 23, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06988085
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 23, 2025
Start date
May 30, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
May 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
May 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
May 23, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion