ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT06984796Updated Jul 29, 2026

Photobiomodulation on Pain Perception During the Insertion of the T 380 Copper Intrauterine Device (IUD)

An interventional study of Photobiomodulation and Simulation of Photobiomodulation in Pain, sponsored by University of Nove de Julho. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in Brazil. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-29.

Sponsored by University of Nove de Julho · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
72
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Unplanned pregnancy affects up to 65% of women in some regions of Brazil, contributing to unsafe abortions and maternal mortality. The copper IUD is an effective long-term contraceptive but is underused, with only 4.4% of women of reproductive age using it. One barrier is the pain during insertion, leading to low adherence. Photobiomodulation (PBM), which has anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects, may offer a solution. This study aims to assess PBM's efficacy as a preemptive analgesic during copper IUD insertion in a randomized, double-blind trial involving 72 participants. The experimental group (n=36) will receive active PBM, while the control group (n=36) will receive PBM simulation. Pain will be measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at multiple time points, and additional outcomes include analgesic use, quality of life (WHOQOL-100), anxiety (GAD-7), satisfaction, and adverse effects. Statistical analysis will include tests such as the Friedman test, logistic regression, and ANOVA, with a significance level of 5%.

Read the detailed description

Unplanned pregnancy affects up to 65% of women in some regions of Brazil, increasing the risks of unsafe abortions and contributing to maternal mortality. The copper IUD is an effective and long-lasting contraceptive option, but its use is still limited in Brazil, covering only 4.4% of women of reproductive age. One of the main barriers is the pain associated with its insertion, which leads to fear and low adherence to the method. Since pain can be of visceral or somatic origin, traditional approaches such as anti-inflammatories and anesthetics have shown inconclusive results in reducing this discomfort. Photobiomodulation (PBM) exhibits anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects and has demonstrated positive results in managing pelvic pain in various clinical contexts, including labor and delivery. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of PBM as a preemptive analgesic method during the insertion of the T 380 copper IUD. A randomized, double-blind clinical trial will be conducted with 72 participants randomly allocated into an experimental group (n=36) - active PBM and a control group (n=36) - PBM simulation. Patients will follow the IUD insertion protocol as outlined in the Ministry of Health guidelines. Pain will be assessed at different time points using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) during the insertion phases (Pozzi, hysterometry, and IUD insertion), at 5 and 15 minutes, and at 24 and 48 hours after IUD insertion.

Additionally, analgesic use and quality of life (as measured by the WHOQOL-100) will be assessed over 48 hours, along with anxiety levels (as measured by the GAD-7), satisfaction with the procedure immediately after insertion (at 15 minutes), and adverse and side effects within 48 hours. The duration of pain, in hours, from the moment of IUD insertion until its resolution, will also be evaluated, as well as the success rate of the procedure. Statistical analysis will be performed using SPSS software version 24.0, with a significance level of 5% (p \< 0.05). Data normality will be assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Student's t-test or the Mann-Whitney test will be used for continuous variables, while the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test will be applied for categorical variables. Pain will be analyzed using the Friedman test, and logistic regression will be used to evaluate associations between groups and adverse effects. Statistical analysis will be performed with a significance level of 5%. Data normality will be assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. For pain analysis (VAS) and variables such as anxiety and quality of life, the Friedman test will be applied. Analgesic use will be evaluated using a repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). Adverse effects will be analyzed using logistic regression. The time to resolve abdominal discomfort will be estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis, and IUD insertion success will be compared using the chi-square test.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • intrauterine device
  • photobiomodulation
03

In context

Pain

10,054 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain; 1,649 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 72 is close to the median of 66 across 8,493 interventional studies indexed under Pain.

Browse Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Nove de Julho is the lead sponsor of 246 studies on the registry; 52 are open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 1 (13%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women aged 18-50 years,
  • Female,
  • No preference regarding race or socioeconomic status,
  • Nulliparous or multiparous.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known or suspected pregnancy,
  • Diagnosed with chronic pain,
  • Active local infection,
  • Use of any pain medication in the last 12 hours,
  • Known for IUD insertion, including significant uterine cavity distortion, active pelvic inflammatory disease, or Wilson's disease,
  • Allergy to copper,
  • Unexplained abnormal uterine bleeding,
  • Any condition affecting the lumbar region, such as active neoplasms, established osteomyelitis, or any pre-existing deep tissue lesions with necrosis or infection,
  • History of photosensitivity.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
72 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Photobiomodulation Group

    All participants will undergo the same Intrauterine Device insertion procedure. For irradiation, a Light Emitting Diode panel from the brand Sportlux® (Brazil, SP) will be used, with the following specifications. Photobiomodulation in the experimental group will be administered using 132 Light Emitting Diodes, with 660 nm and 850 nm wavelengths, applied in contact mode. Each Light Emitting Diode has an emission area of 0.5 cm², with an application time of 20 minutes, an irradiance of 16 mW/cm², and an energy delivery of 4.8 J per Light Emitting Diode, resulting in a radiant exposure of 9.6 J/cm².

    Device: Photobiomodulation

  • Sham comparator
    Simulation of Photobiomodulation Group

    All participants in this group will undergo the conventional Intrauterine Device insertion procedure, as previously described. They will receive a simulation of photobiomodulation and will be treated identically to the Experimental Group. The researcher responsible for the photobiomodulation application will simulate irradiation by positioning the device in the exact location as in the Experimental Group; however, the equipment will remain turned off. To prevent participants from identifying the group to which they belong, the device's activation sound (beep) will be pre-recorded and played during the application.

    Other: Simulation of Photobiomodulation

Interventions

  • DevicePhotobiomodulation

    The irradiated region will cover the lumbar and thoracic spine, specifically from T10 to L4, using the Light Emitting Diode panel in a vertical orientation. Photobiomodulation in the experimental group will be administered using 132 Light Emitting Diodes with wavelengths of 660 nm and 850 nm, applied in contact mode. Each Light Emitting Diode has an emission area of 0.5 cm², with an application time of 20 minutes, an irradiance of 16 mW/cm², and an energy delivery of 4.8 J per Light Emitting Diode, resulting in a radiant exposure of 9.6 J/cm².

    Also known as: low level laser therapy

  • OtherSimulation of Photobiomodulation

    The researcher responsible for the photobiomodulation application will simulate irradiation by positioning the device in the exact location as in the Photobiomodulation Group; however, the equipment will remain turned off. To prevent participants from identifying the group to which they belong, the device's activation sound (beep) will be pre-recorded and played during the application.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain in baseline

    VAS (Visual Analog Scale): Pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), a validated tool consisting of a 10-centimeter horizontal line ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Participants were instructed to mark a point on the line that best represented their perceived pain at each procedural step.

    Time frame: baseline

  2. Pain in five minutes

    VAS (Visual Analog Scale): Pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), a validated tool consisting of a 10-centimeter horizontal line ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Participants were instructed to mark a point on the line that best represented their perceived pain at each procedural step.

    Time frame: 5 minutes

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain in Pozzi Clamp Placement

    VAS (Visual Analog Scale): Pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), a validated tool consisting of a 10-centimeter horizontal line ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Participants were instructed to mark a point on the line that best represented their perceived pain at each procedural step: Pozzi Clamp Placement: A tenaculum is gently applied to the anterior lip of the cervix to align the uterine axis and provide cervical stabilization, facilitating safe access to the uterine cavity.

    Time frame: Immediately at the time of Pozzi clamp placement, assessed within 1 minute of application

  2. Pain in Hysterometry

    VAS (Visual Analog Scale): Pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), a validated tool consisting of a 10-centimeter horizontal line ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Participants were instructed to mark a point on the line that best represented their perceived pain at each procedural step: Hysterometry: A sterile uterine sound is inserted to assess the direction and depth of the uterine cavity, which is essential for guiding correct IUD placement and minimizing complications.

    Time frame: Immediately at the time of hysterometry, assessed within 1 minute of the procedure

  3. Pain in Intrauterine Device Insertion

    VAS (Visual Analog Scale): Pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), a validated tool consisting of a 10-centimeter horizontal line ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Participants were instructed to mark a point on the line that best represented their perceived pain at each procedural step: Intrauterine Device Insertion: The IUD is carefully introduced through the cervical canal and positioned at the uterine fundus. Once released, the device remains in place, and the strings are trimmed to ensure proper follow-up and future removal.

    Time frame: Immediately at the time of IUD insertion, assessed within 1 minute of the procedure

  4. Pain in 15 minutes

    VAS (Visual Analog Scale): Pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), a validated tool consisting of a 10-centimeter horizontal line ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Participants were instructed to mark a point on the line that best represented their perceived pain at each procedural step.

    Time frame: 15 minutes

  5. Pain in 24 hours

    VAS (Visual Analog Scale): Pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), a validated tool consisting of a 10-centimeter horizontal line ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Participants were instructed to mark a point on the line that best represented their perceived pain at each procedural step.

    Time frame: 24 hour

  6. Pain in 48 hours

    VAS (Visual Analog Scale): Pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), a validated tool consisting of a 10-centimeter horizontal line ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Participants were instructed to mark a point on the line that best represented their perceived pain at each procedural step.

    Time frame: 48 hour

  7. Number of analgesics taken in baseline

    Paracetamol intake was recorded at the T 380 copper IUD insertion baseline. At the beginning of the study, each participant will receive a blister pack of paracetamol (a pure analgesic) (Jóźwiak-Bebenista, 2014), which must be kept until the end of the study and will only be used in cases of pain. At the end of the study, the remaining number of tablets will be assessed as an additional pain measurement parameter. The analgesic used will be paracetamol 500 mg, to be taken only if necessary at a dose of one tablet every six hours. Participants will be asked to record in writing the number of tablets taken, along with the date and time of consumption. A monitoring procedure will be implemented to ensure adherence: participants must bring their blister pack to follow-up visits for verification.

    Time frame: Baseline

  8. Number of analgesics taken in a total period of 48 hours

    Paracetamol intake was recorded from baseline to 24 hours after the T 380 copper IUD insertion. At the beginning of the study, each participant will receive a blister pack of paracetamol (a pure analgesic), which must be kept until the end of the study and will only be used in pain cases. At the end of the study, the remaining number of tablets will be assessed as an additional pain measurement parameter. The analgesic used will be paracetamol 500 mg, to be taken only if necessary, at a dose of one tablet every six hours. Participants will be asked to record in writing the number of tablets taken, along with the date and time of consumption. A monitoring procedure will be implemented to ensure adherence: participants must bring their blister pack to follow-up visits for verification. Medication use will be tracked from baseline to 24 hours post-insertion.

    Time frame: 48 hours

  9. Anxiety assessment in baseline

    Generalized anxiety symptoms were evaluated at baseline in patients using the T 380 copper intrauterine device for contraception, through the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) questionnaire. This self-administered tool, based on DSM-IV criteria, assesses the frequency of anxiety symptoms over the prior two weeks using a four-point Likert scale: 0 (never), 1 (several days), 2 (more than half the days), and 3 (nearly every day). Suitable for clinical and research use, and applicable in person or digitally, it takes about five minutes to complete. Total scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms, categorized as follows: 0-4 (no anxiety), 5-9 (mild), 10-14 (moderate), and 15-21 (severe anxiety).

    Time frame: at Baseline

  10. Anxiety assessment after 15 minutes of insertion

    Generalized anxiety symptoms were evaluated at baseline in patients using the T 380 copper intrauterine device for contraception, through the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) questionnaire. This self-administered tool, based on DSM-IV criteria, assesses the frequency of anxiety symptoms over the prior two weeks using a four-point Likert scale: 0 (never), 1 (several days), 2 (more than half the days), and 3 (nearly every day). Suitable for clinical and research use, and applicable in person or digitally, it takes about five minutes to complete. Total scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms, categorized as follows: 0-4 (no anxiety), 5-9 (mild), 10-14 (moderate), and 15-21 (severe anxiety).

    Time frame: 15 minutes after the insertion

  11. Quality of life assessment at baseline

    Measured using the WHOQOL-Pain instrument at Baseline. The WHOQOL-Pain is an additional module of the WHOQOL-100, specifically developed to assess quality of life in individuals experiencing chronic pain. Each facet consists of four questions addressing different dimensions of the pain experience. Responses follow a five-point Likert scale, measuring intensity, capacity, evaluation, and frequency. Scores are converted to a 0 to 100 scale, allowing for a quantitative interpretation of pain levels and their impact on quality of life. The WHOQOL-Pain items are not integrated into the WHOQOL-100 and are applied separately at the end of the main questionnaire. This structure facilitates individualized analysis of pain-related facets, enabling a specific and detailed evaluation of physical chronic pain experiences.

    Time frame: at baseline

  12. Quality of life assessment after 48 hours

    Measured using the WHOQOL-Pain instrument from baseline to 48 hours after insertion. The WHOQOL-Pain is an additional module of the WHOQOL-100, specifically developed to assess quality of life in individuals experiencing chronic pain. Each facet consists of four questions addressing different dimensions of the pain experience. Responses follow a five-point Likert scale, measuring intensity, capacity, evaluation, and frequency. Scores are converted to a 0 to 100 scale, allowing for a quantitative interpretation of pain levels and their impact on quality of life. The WHOQOL-Pain items are not integrated into the WHOQOL-100 and are applied separately at the end of the main questionnaire. This structure facilitates individualized analysis of pain-related facets, enabling a specific and detailed evaluation of physical chronic pain experiences.

    Time frame: 48 hours after the insertion

  13. Participant Satisfaction

    Patient satisfaction with T 380 copper intrauterine device insertion for contraceptive purposes was assessed 15 minutes after the procedure using a dichotomous questionnaire adapted from Lopes et al. (2015). The instrument included three yes-or-no questions: (1) Was the insertion experience pleasant? (2) Would you undergo the procedure again in the future? (3) Would you recommend it to a friend? For each item, the response "yes" indicated satisfaction with the procedure, while "no" reflected dissatisfaction. Responses were scored as 1 for "yes" and 0 for "no", resulting in a total score ranging from 0 (maximum satisfaction) to 3 (maximum dissatisfaction). Higher scores indicated greater dissatisfaction with the procedure.

    Time frame: 15 minutes after insertion

  14. Time required for abdominal discomfort relief (menstrual cramps)

    The time required to relieve abdominal discomfort (menstrual cramps) was recorded from the day of the baseline assessment.

    Time frame: baseline

  15. Time required for abdominal discomfort relief (menstrual cramps)

    The time required to relieve abdominal discomfort (menstrual cramps) was recorded until the day the discomfort stopped. The patient will be asked after 48 h

    Time frame: 48 hours after insertion

  16. Successful insertion

    If IUD insertion fails, it will be assessed dichotomously (success/failure) from baseline to 24 hours after insertion, and verified by ultrasonography when necessary.

    Time frame: 48 hours after insertion

  17. Adverse effects

    Including uterine perforation, IUD displacement, abdominal pain, increased vaginal bleeding, and allergic reactions. An open-ended question will allow participants to report adverse effects, followed by a list of potential effects to help recall any unreported symptoms.

    Time frame: 48 hours

  18. Side effects

    Including cramps, mild pain, light bleeding, and tongue numbness. An open-ended question will be asked first, followed by a list of potential side effects for better recall.

    Time frame: 48 hours

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Nove de Julho University (UNINOVE)
    São Paulo, 01504-001, Brazil
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ferraz ACN, Traverzim MA, Makabe S, Machado GGA, Bussadori SK, Mesquita-Ferrari RA, Duran CCG, Motta LJ, Fernandes KPS, Horliana ACRT. Photobiomodulation for pain management during placement of the copper T 380 intrauterine device: Protocol for a randomized, double-blind controlled trial. PLoS One. 2026 May 28;21(5):e0349031. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0349031. eCollection 2026. PubMed 42207758 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 29, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06984796
Responsible party
Anna Carolina Ratto Tempestini Horliana (Clinical Professor, University of Nove de Julho) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 22, 2025
Start date
Mar 30, 2026
Primary completion
Oct 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 29, 2026

Study contacts

Anna Carolina Nunes Ferraz
principal investigator · University of Nove de Julho

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion