CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06983938TAVI-CLOSEUpdated Jun 25, 2026Results posted

This Study Will Evaluate the Safety and Potential Complications of Dual ProGlide vs Single ProGlide and Angioseal for Common Femoral Arteriotomy Closure Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

An interventional study of Double Perclose Proglide and Single Perclose Proglide plus Angioseal in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and Closure Technique, sponsored by Baylor Research Institute. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-25.

Sponsored by Baylor Research Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
92
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This prospective, randomized, parallel, single-center, open-label, non-inferiority study will evaluate the safety and potential complications of dual ProGlide vs single ProGlide and Angioseal for common femoral arteriotomy closure following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective, randomized, parallel, open-label, single-center, non-inferiority study.

Approximately 90 patients undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement with femoral access will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive femoral access closure using either dual Perclose Proglide or single Perclose Proglide and Angioseal for closure.

The primary end point of this study is the composite endpoint of main access-related bleeding ≥Type 2 and main access related major vascular complication. Secondary end points include periprocedural complications (such as acute vessel closure, leg embolization and perforation), procedural characteristics (total duration, fluoroscopy time, contrast volume, length of hospital stay), and cost of hospitalization. A routine follow-up visit assessment will be performed at 30 days in the valve clinic and the assessment will include: any clinical change, re-interventions, and peripheral pulse evaluation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
  • Closure Technique

Keywords

  • Transcatheter aortic valve replacement
  • Perclose Proglide
  • Angioseal
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Baylor Research Institute is the lead sponsor of 219 studies on the registry; 49 are open to participants now.

Of its 23 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 9 (39%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years old
  • Planned to undergo transcatheter aortic valve replacement via femoral access
  • Able to provide written informed consent prior to study participation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-femoral access
  • Previous repair or intervention of the common femoral artery
  • Previous pseudoaneurysm of the common femoral artery
  • Children below 18 years, prisoners, and patients who are unable to provide consent are excluded.
  • In another research study that has not granted permission to dual-enroll.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
92 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Dual Perclose Proglide

    Upon completion of valve replacement, this cohort will be closed using dual Perclose Proglide devices.

    Device: Double Perclose Proglide

  • Active comparator
    Single Perclose Proglide plus Angioseal

    Upon completion of valve replacement, this cohort will be closed using a single Perclose Proglide device and single Angioseal device.

    Device: Single Perclose Proglide plus Angioseal

Interventions

  • DeviceDouble Perclose Proglide

    Upon completion of valve replacement, closure will proceed using two Perclose Proglide devices.

  • DeviceSingle Perclose Proglide plus Angioseal

    Upon completion of valve replacement, closure will proceed using one Perclose Proglide device plus one Angioseal device.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Main Access-related Bleeding and Vascular Complications

    Primary endpoint collected will be the number of participants with the composite endpoint of main access-related bleeding ≥Type 2 and main access related major vascular complication- VARC (Valve Academic Research Consortium) 3 Criteria.

    Time frame: Periprocedural through hospital discharge, an average of 1.5 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Periprocedural Complications

    A secondary endpoint will be the number of participants with periprocedural complications including acute vessel closure, leg embolization, or vessel perforation/dissection.

    Time frame: Periprocedural through hospital discharge, an average of 1.5 days

  2. Procedural Total Duration

    Total procedure duration from procedure start to completion.

    Time frame: Periprocedural, around 1.5 hours

  3. Fluoroscopy Time

    Total fluoroscopy time will be measured from procedure start to completion.

    Time frame: Periprocedural, around 1.5 hours

  4. Contrast Volume

    Total contrast volume will be measured from the start of the procedure until completion.

    Time frame: Periprocedural, about 1.5 hours

  5. Length of Hospital Stay

    The length of the hospital stay will be collected.

    Time frame: From patient arrival until discharge, about 1.5 days

  6. Cost of Hospital Stay

    The cost of the hospital stay will be collected.

    Time frame: Patient arrival to discharge, about 1.5 days

  7. Minor Vascular Complications

    The number of participants with minor vascular complications will be collected

    Time frame: Periprocedural, about 1.5 hours

  8. Need for Secondary Closure Device

    The number of participants with the need for a secondary closure device will be collected.

    Time frame: Periprocedural, about 1.5 hours

07

Results

Posted Mar 16, 2026

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneDual Perclose ProglideSingle Perclose Proglide Plus Angioseal
Started4745
Completed4742
Not completed03

Outcome measures

PrimaryMain Access-related Bleeding and Vascular Complications

Primary endpoint collected will be the number of participants with the composite endpoint of main access-related bleeding ≥Type 2 and main access related major vascular complication- VARC (Valve Academic Research Consortium) 3 Criteria.

Time frame:
Periprocedural through hospital discharge, an average of 1.5 days
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Main Access-related Bleeding and Vascular Complications
ParticipantsDual Perclose ProglideSingle Perclose Proglide Plus Angioseal
Main Access-related Bleeding and Vascular Complications13
SecondaryPeriprocedural Complications

A secondary endpoint will be the number of participants with periprocedural complications including acute vessel closure, leg embolization, or vessel perforation/dissection.

Time frame:
Periprocedural through hospital discharge, an average of 1.5 days
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Periprocedural Complications
ParticipantsDual Perclose ProglideSingle Perclose Proglide Plus Angioseal
Periprocedural Complications00
SecondaryProcedural Total Duration

Total procedure duration from procedure start to completion.

Time frame:
Periprocedural, around 1.5 hours
Reported as:
Median · Minutes
Procedural Total Duration
MinutesDual Perclose ProglideSingle Perclose Proglide Plus Angioseal
Procedural Total Duration32 (27 to 39)31 (25 to 38)
SecondaryFluoroscopy Time

Total fluoroscopy time will be measured from procedure start to completion.

Time frame:
Periprocedural, around 1.5 hours
Reported as:
Median · Minutes
Fluoroscopy Time
MinutesDual Perclose ProglideSingle Perclose Proglide Plus Angioseal
Fluoroscopy Time10 (6.5 to 13.1)8.3 (6.5 to 10.4)
SecondaryContrast Volume

Total contrast volume will be measured from the start of the procedure until completion.

Time frame:
Periprocedural, about 1.5 hours
Reported as:
Median · milliliters
Contrast Volume
millilitersDual Perclose ProglideSingle Perclose Proglide Plus Angioseal
Contrast Volume37 (30 to 53)40 (34 to 50)
SecondaryLength of Hospital Stay

The length of the hospital stay will be collected.

Time frame:
From patient arrival until discharge, about 1.5 days
Reported as:
Median · Days
Length of Hospital Stay
DaysDual Perclose ProglideSingle Perclose Proglide Plus Angioseal
Length of Hospital Stay1.1 (1.0 to 1.2)1.1 (1.0 to 1.2)
SecondaryCost of Hospital Stay

The cost of the hospital stay will be collected.

Time frame:
Patient arrival to discharge, about 1.5 days
Reported as:
Mean · Dollars
Cost of Hospital Stay
DollarsDual Perclose ProglideSingle Perclose Proglide Plus Angioseal
Cost of Hospital Stay41932.9 ± 3091.0642419.4 ± 4923.06
SecondaryMinor Vascular Complications

The number of participants with minor vascular complications will be collected

Time frame:
Periprocedural, about 1.5 hours
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Minor Vascular Complications
ParticipantsDual Perclose ProglideSingle Perclose Proglide Plus Angioseal
Minor Vascular Complications00
SecondaryNeed for Secondary Closure Device

The number of participants with the need for a secondary closure device will be collected.

Time frame:
Periprocedural, about 1.5 hours
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Need for Secondary Closure Device
ParticipantsDual Perclose ProglideSingle Perclose Proglide Plus Angioseal
Need for Secondary Closure Device00

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were collected from the start of the procedure procedure until 30-days after the procedure.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Dual Perclose Proglide1/47 (2.1%)1/47 (2.1%)2/47 (4.3%)
Single Perclose Proglide Plus Angioseal0/42 (0%)0/42 (0%)0/42 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventDual Perclose ProglideSingle Perclose Proglide Plus Angioseal
Respiratory Failure with interstital lung disease and viral infectionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/470/42
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventDual Perclose ProglideSingle Perclose Proglide Plus Angioseal
Acute CholecystitisGastrointestinal disorders1/470/42
Acute chronic hypoxic respiratory failureRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/47—

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Dual Perclose ProglideSingle Perclose Proglide Plus AngiosealTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years134
>=65 years463985
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Dual Perclose ProglideSingle Perclose Proglide Plus AngiosealTotal
Mean80.0 ± 7.4176.6 ± 6.9578.4 ± 7.36
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Dual Perclose ProglideSingle Perclose Proglide Plus AngiosealTotal
Female171633
Male302656
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Dual Perclose ProglideSingle Perclose Proglide Plus AngiosealTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American011
White434184
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported404
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Dual Perclose ProglideSingle Perclose Proglide Plus AngiosealTotal
United States474289
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Baylor Scott & White The Heart Hospital - Plano
    Plano, Texas 75093, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Kiramijyan S, Magalhaes MA, Ben-Dor I, Koifman E, Escarcega RO, Baker NC, Torguson R, Okubagzi P, Bernardo NL, Satler LF, Pichard AD, Waksman R. The adjunctive use of Angio-Seal in femoral vascular closure following percutaneous transcatheter aortic valve replacement. EuroIntervention. 2016 May 17;12(1):88-93. doi: 10.4244/EIJV12I1A16. PubMed 27173868 ↗
  • Ko TY, Kao HL, Liu YJ, Yeh CF, Huang CC, Chen YH, Hung CS, Chan CY, Lin LC, Chen YS, Lin MS. Intentional combination of ProGlide and Angio-Seal for femoral access haemostasis in transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Int J Cardiol. 2019 Oct 15;293:76-79. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.05.055. Epub 2019 May 23. PubMed 31155328 ↗
  • Bazarbashi N, Ahuja K, Gad MM, Sammour YM, Kaur M, Karrthik A, Saad AM, Khubber S, Dhaliwal K, Mick SL, Navia JL, Puri R, Reed GW, Krishnaswamy A, Kapadia SR. The utilization of single versus double Perclose devices for transfemoral aortic valve replacement access site closure: Insights from Cleveland Clinic Aortic Valve Center. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Aug;96(2):442-447. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28585. Epub 2019 Nov 12. PubMed 31713996 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Dec 13, 2024

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 25, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06983938
Lead sponsor
Baylor Research Institute
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 21, 2025
Start date
Feb 12, 2025
Primary completion
Aug 13, 2025
Completion
Oct 15, 2025
Results posted
Mar 16, 2026
Last update
Jun 25, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion