CClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT06979934Updated May 20, 2025

Effect of 3D Printing Functional Hand Splints for Patients With Stroke

An interventional study of 3D printing splint group and functional splint group in Stroke, sponsored by Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho Hospital. Withdrawn at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-20.

Sponsored by Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was withdrawn
Because the project proposal was not approved for funding, it was not carried out.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study is to evaluate the effect of 3D printing functional splints on hand function for patients with stroke.Twenty stroke patients with moderate motor deficits were recruited and randomized into experimental (3D printing splint) or control (functional splint) groups for 8 weeks of treatment.The performance was assessed by a blinded assessor for two times including motor, function, and feasibility.Collected data will be analyzed with nonparametric tests by SPSS version 20.0, and alpha level was set at .05.

Read the detailed description

Background: Spasticity is an important factor limiting independency and activity of daily living for post-stroke patients. Splinting has been proved to be successful treatment for spasticity.3D printing technology was used to construct personalized, complicated orthosis, and one piece to reduce assembly time. The evidence most are product development, but few of study investigate the effectiveness.

Aim: To evaluate the effect of 3D printing functional splints on hand function for patients with stroke.

Methods: Twenty stroke patients with moderate motor deficits were recruited and randomized into experimental (3D printing splint) or control (functional splint) groups for 8 weeks of treatment (Sixty minutes for position and twenty minutes for training a time, triple times a day). The performance was assessed by a blinded assessor for two times included Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Limb section(FMA-UE), Electromyography (EMG), Grip dynamometer, Passive Range of motion (PROM) at upper extremity, Muscle tone at upper extremity, and Disability of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire(DASH). The splint wearing performance and Satisfaction were recorded. Collected data will be analyzed with nonparametric tests by SPSS version 20.0, and alpha level was set at .05.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke

Browse trials for

03

In context

Stroke

7,286 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,007 are open to participants now.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho Hospital is the lead sponsor of 100 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Cerebral stroke, patients with unilateral hemiplegia
  • Onset is more than three months;
  • Able to understand activity instructions;
  • Fugl-Meyer assessment 20-50 points

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age over 75 years and under 20 years old;
  • Other medical diseases that affect the execution program
  • Modified Ashworth Scale of Wrist and hand greater than 2 Points
  • Deformed elbow, wrist and hand joints
  • Treated with botulinum toxin on the upper limbs of the affected side.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    3D printing splint group

    3D printing splint for 8 weeks of treatment (Sixty minutes for position and twenty minutes for training a time, triple times a day)

    Behavioral: 3D printing splint group

  • Active comparator
    functional splint group

    functional splint for 8 weeks of treatment (Sixty minutes for position and twenty minutes for training a time, triple times a day)

    Behavioral: functional splint group

Interventions

  • Behavioral3D printing splint group

    Wear 3D printing design splint for position for 60 minutes each time, plus 20 minutes of exercise which including:(1) Raise hands for 5 minutes, and bend and straighten the elbow for 5 minutes for proximal movement exercise;(2) Wear 3D printed design hand splint and change objects according to the ability of grasp, such as hold a cup, handle, eraser, pen, etc.

  • Behavioralfunctional splint group

    Wear functional splint for position for 60 minutes each time, plus 20 minutes of exercise which including:(1) Raise hands for 5 minutes, and bend and straighten the elbow for 5 minutes for proximal movement exercise;(2) Grasp the holder according the grasp ability, such as hold a cup, handle, eraser, pen, etc.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Fugl-Meyer Assessment-upper extremity

    The Fugl-Meyer Assessment-upper extremity (FMA-UE) measures motor impairment in the upper extremity. The assessment consists of 33 items, including movement, reflex, grasp, and coordination, and a total score of 66.The unit of measure is score.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline at 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Electromyography

    Record the maximum voluntary contraction (maximal voluntary contraction; MVC) of the wrist extensor muscles, total extensor muscles, and flexor muscles.The unit of measure is motor unit.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline at 8 weeks

  2. Dynanometer

    The grip dynamometer was used to measure the maximum isometric strength of the hand and forearm muscles. The mean score of 3 trials was calculated. For this measurement, the elbow was placed at 90° and the forearm was placed in mid-position.The unit of measure is kilograms.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline at 8 weeks

  3. Range of motion of upper limb joints

    Passive movement angle of elbow joint, wrist joint and thumb, finger metacarpophalangeal joint.The unit of measure is degree.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline at 8 weeks

  4. Disabilities of The Arm, Shoulder And Hand Questionnaire

    a self-administered region-specific outcome instrument developed as a measure of self-rated upper-extremity disability and symptoms. The DASH consists mainly of a 30-item disability/symptom scale, scored 0 (no disability) to 100. We used the subtest of Activity capacity, severity of illness.The unit of measure is score.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline at 8 weeks

  5. Side effects record

    The number of side effects after intervention (such as soreness, pain, motion vertigo, injury, etc.) were recorded every day. The unit of measure is number of times.

    Time frame: Every training session, total sessions continued to 8 weeks

  6. Satisfaction questionnaire

    The questionnaire is a subjective self-filling scale using a hand brace, with 5-level scores (strongly agree to strongly disagree), including aesthetics, complexity, weight, resistance, comfort, ease of wear, etc.The unit of measure is score.

    Time frame: Every training session, total sessions continued to 8 weeks

  7. Wear performance record

    The wear and exercise times were recorded every day. The unit of measure is number of times.

    Time frame: Every training session, total sessions continued to 8 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University
    Taipei, 235, Taiwan
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Alexander J, Dawson J, Langhorne P. Dynamic hand orthoses for the recovery of hand and arm function in adults after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2022 Mar;29(2):114-124. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2021.1878669. Epub 2021 Jan 31. PubMed 33517868 ↗
  • Ates, S., Haarman, C. J., & Stienen, A. H. J. A. R. (2017). SCRIPT passive orthosis: design of interactive hand and wrist exoskeleton for rehabilitation at home after stroke. 41(3), 711-723.
  • Azeez, A., Gopichand, A., Shankar, N., Hanumantharao, K. J. I. J. o. E. T., & Technology. (2015). A novel prosthetic hand support for physically disabled. 29(6), 295-298
  • Baronio G, Harran S, Signoroni A. A Critical Analysis of a Hand Orthosis Reverse Engineering and 3D Printing Process. Appl Bionics Biomech. 2016;2016:8347478. doi: 10.1155/2016/8347478. Epub 2016 Aug 9. PubMed 27594781 ↗
  • Basteris A, Nijenhuis SM, Stienen AH, Buurke JH, Prange GB, Amirabdollahian F. Training modalities in robot-mediated upper limb rehabilitation in stroke: a framework for classification based on a systematic review. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014 Jul 10;11:111. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-111. PubMed 25012864 ↗
  • Cazon, A., Aizpurua, J., Paterson, A., Bibb, R., Campbell, R. I. J. V., & Prototyping, P. (2014). Customised design and manufacture of protective face masks combining a practitioner-friendly modelling approach and low-cost devices for digitising and additive manufacturing: This paper analyses the viability of replacing conventional practice with AM method to make customized protective face masks. 9(4), 251-261.
  • Chang, K., Chang, J.-H., Huang, M.-W., & Lee, L.-Y. (2018). Innovative orthosis for phalanx extension neurofacilitation (iOPEN)-development of a 3D-printed hand orthosis for chronic stroke patient. Paper presented at the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Applied System Invention (ICASI).
  • Chang WD, Lai PT. New design of home-based dynamic hand splint for hemiplegic hands: a preliminary study. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Mar;27(3):829-31. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.829. Epub 2015 Mar 31. PubMed 25931740 ↗
  • Copley J, Kuipers K, Fleming J, Rassafiani M. Individualised resting hand splints for adults with acquired brain injury: a randomized, single blinded, single case design. NeuroRehabilitation. 2013;32(4):885-98. doi: 10.3233/NRE-130913. PubMed 23867415 ↗
  • Diment LE, Thompson MS, Bergmann JH. Three-dimensional printed upper-limb prostheses lack randomised controlled trials: A systematic review. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2018 Feb;42(1):7-13. doi: 10.1177/0309364617704803. Epub 2017 Jun 24. PubMed 28649911 ↗
  • Duncan PW, Propst M, Nelson SG. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident. Phys Ther. 1983 Oct;63(10):1606-10. doi: 10.1093/ptj/63.10.1606. PubMed 6622535 ↗
  • Emzain, Z. F., Huang, S.-C., Yang, Y.-S., & Qosim, N. J. R. M. (2020). Design and Analysis of a Dynamic Splint Based on Pulley Rotation for Post-Stroke Finger Extension Rehabilitation Device. 11(3), 477-485.
  • Feigin VL, Forouzanfar MH, Krishnamurthi R, Mensah GA, Connor M, Bennett DA, Moran AE, Sacco RL, Anderson L, Truelsen T, O'Donnell M, Venketasubramanian N, Barker-Collo S, Lawes CM, Wang W, Shinohara Y, Witt E, Ezzati M, Naghavi M, Murray C; Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2010 (GBD 2010) and the GBD Stroke Experts Group. Global and regional burden of stroke during 1990-2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2014 Jan 18;383(9913):245-54. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61953-4. PubMed 24449944 ↗
  • Fitzpatrick, A. P., Mohanned, M. I., Collins, P. K., & Gibson, I. J. K. E. (2017). Design of a patient specific, 3D printed arm cast. 135-142.
  • Gregson JM, Leathley M, Moore AP, Sharma AK, Smith TL, Watkins CL. Reliability of the Tone Assessment Scale and the modified Ashworth scale as clinical tools for assessing poststroke spasticity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 Sep;80(9):1013-6. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(99)90053-9. PubMed 10489001 ↗
  • Hamilton GF, McDonald C, Chenier TC. Measurement of grip strength: validity and reliability of the sphygmomanometer and jamar grip dynamometer. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1992;16(5):215-9. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1992.16.5.215. PubMed 18796752 ↗
  • Jang SH. The recovery of walking in stroke patients: a review. Int J Rehabil Res. 2010 Dec;33(4):285-9. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e32833f0500. PubMed 20805757 ↗
  • Katalinic OM, Harvey LA, Herbert RD, Moseley AM, Lannin NA, Schurr K. Stretch for the treatment and prevention of contractures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Sep 8;(9):CD007455. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007455.pub2. PubMed 20824861 ↗
  • Liang HW, Wang HK, Yao G, Horng YS, Hou SM. Psychometric evaluation of the Taiwan version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. J Formos Med Assoc. 2004 Oct;103(10):773-9. PubMed 15490028 ↗
  • Lubbes, E. (2016). Investigation and Assessment of Upper-Limb Prosthetic Care and Business Model Design for 3D-Printed Prostheses in the Netherlands.
  • Marque P, Gasq D, Castel-Lacanal E, De Boissezon X, Loubinoux I. Post-stroke hemiplegia rehabilitation: evolution of the concepts. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2014 Nov;57(8):520-529. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2014.08.004. Epub 2014 Aug 23. PubMed 25282582 ↗
  • Mills PB, Finlayson H, Sudol M, O'Connor R. Systematic review of adjunct therapies to improve outcomes following botulinum toxin injection for treatment of limb spasticity. Clin Rehabil. 2016 Jun;30(6):537-48. doi: 10.1177/0269215515593783. Epub 2015 Jul 21. PubMed 26198891 ↗
  • Munhoz, R., Moraes, C. A. d. C., Tanaka, H., & Kunkel, M. E. J. R. o. B. E. (2016). A digital approach for design and fabrication by rapid prototyping of orthosis for developmental dysplasia of the hip. 32(1), 63-73.
  • Nordin N, Xie SQ, Wunsche B. Assessment of movement quality in robot- assisted upper limb rehabilitation after stroke: a review. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014 Sep 12;11:137. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-137. PubMed 25217124 ↗
  • Phillips, B., Zingalis, G., Ritter, S., & Mehta, K. (2015). A review of current upper-limb prostheses for resource constrained settings. Paper presented at the 2015 IEEE global humanitarian technology conference (GHTC).
  • Pizzi A, Carlucci G, Falsini C, Verdesca S, Grippo A. Application of a volar static splint in poststroke spasticity of the upper limb. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Sep;86(9):1855-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.032. PubMed 16181954 ↗
  • Sakai, R., Haraguchi, M., Kanamori, M., Yamada, K., Ishida, K., & Kobayashi, Y. J. A. J. o. O. T. (2020). Development of a Finger Extension Assistance Splint for a Hemiplegic Upper Limb After Stroke-A Case Report. 16(1), 83-86.
  • Santamato A, Micello MF, Panza F, Fortunato F, Picelli A, Smania N, Logroscino G, Fiore P, Ranieri M. Adhesive taping vs. daily manual muscle stretching and splinting after botulinum toxin type A injection for wrist and fingers spastic overactivity in stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2015 Jan;29(1):50-8. doi: 10.1177/0269215514537915. Epub 2014 Jun 10. PubMed 24917588 ↗
  • Tanabe, H., Nagao, T., & Tanemura, R. J. A. J. o. O. T. (2011). Application of constraint-induced movement therapy for people with severe chronic plegic hand. 9(1), 7-14.
  • Thibaut A, Chatelle C, Ziegler E, Bruno MA, Laureys S, Gosseries O. Spasticity after stroke: physiology, assessment and treatment. Brain Inj. 2013;27(10):1093-105. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2013.804202. Epub 2013 Jul 25. PubMed 23885710 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 20, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06979934
Lead sponsor
Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 20, 2025
Start date
Jul 1, 2021 (estimated)
Primary completion
Aug 30, 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 30, 2022 (estimated)
Last update
May 20, 2025

Study contacts

Hsinchieh Lee
principal investigator · Taipei Medical University, Taiwan, R.O.C.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion