CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06978049LA30051990Updated May 18, 2025

Use of Lactic Acid Gel for Intravaginal Use, 7 Applicators x 5ml, Bayer to Reduce Post-episiotomy Discomfort

An interventional study of Topical Lactic Acid Gel (BAYER) in Episiotomy, Wound Healing and Postpartum Period, sponsored by Saint Andrew Hospital Constanta. Completed at 1 site in Romania. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 40 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-18.

Sponsored by Saint Andrew Hospital Constanta · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 2 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2023, registered Apr 2025).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 40 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This prospective controlled study evaluates the efficacy of topical lactic acid gel in enhancing episiotomy wound healing and improving postpartum sexual quality of life.

Read the detailed description

This prospective controlled clinical study aims to evaluate the efficacy of topical lactic acid gel in promoting the healing of episiotomy wounds and improving postpartum sexual quality of life.

The study was conducted at the County Clinical Emergency Hospital "Sf. Ap. Andrei" in Constanța, Romania, between February 1, 2023, and December 31, 2024, with ethical approvals obtained from both the Ethics Committee of Ovidius University of Constanța (No. 01/20.01.2023) and the Saint Andrew Hospital Ethics Committee (No. 7230/31.01.2023).

A total of 100 postpartum women aged 18 to 40 years, who underwent spontaneous vaginal delivery with mediolateral episiotomy at a gestational age of 38-40 weeks, were enrolled in the study after providing informed consent. Participants were sequentially assigned into two parallel groups:

Experimental Group (n = 50): Received topical lactic acid gel (commercially available formulation from BAYER, Bucharest, Romania) applied once daily directly to the episiotomy site, starting seven days postpartum, for a total duration of seven consecutive days.

Control Group (n = 50): Received standard postpartum care without additional topical treatments, allowing for spontaneous healing of the episiotomy wound.

The primary endpoint was the assessment of episiotomy wound healing quality at 40 days postpartum, determined via visual inspection and healing scoring. The secondary endpoint was the evaluation of postpartum sexual function, assessed using a validated 12-item sexual quality of life questionnaire specifically designed for postpartum women. The questionnaire addressed domains including sexual desire, orgasm frequency, sexual satisfaction, pain during intercourse (dyspareunia), vaginal dryness, emotional well-being during intercourse, and partner-related factors. Higher total scores reflected better sexual health and satisfaction.

02

Conditions studied

  • Episiotomy
  • Wound Healing
  • Postpartum Period

Keywords

  • Episiotomy
  • Wound Healing
  • Postpartum
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Saint Andrew Hospital Constanta is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Women aged 18-40 years
  • Spontaneous vaginal delivery with mediolateral episiotomy at 38-40 weeks gestation
  • No pre-existing wound healing disorders or infections
  • Provided informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known hypersensitivity to lactic acid products
  • Third- or fourth-degree perineal tears
  • Gestational diabetes or immunosuppressive conditions
  • Use of additional wound care treatments
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Canesbalance Group

    Participants in this group received topical lactic acid gel (a commercial product from BAYER, Bucharest, Romania) applied once daily directly to the episiotomy site. Treatment began on day 7 postpartum and continued for seven consecutive days.

    Drug: Topical Lactic Acid Gel (BAYER)

  • No intervention
    No Intervention Group

    Participants in this group received standard postpartum care without the addition of lactic acid gel or any other specific wound-healing treatments. Healing occurred spontaneously according to routine clinical practice.

Interventions

  • DrugTopical Lactic Acid Gel (BAYER)

    Lactic acid gel, applied topically once daily to the episiotomy site, starting on postpartum day 7 for a total of seven consecutive days. Commercial product: BAYER (Bucharest, Romania).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Episiotomy Wound Healing Score at 40 Days Postpartum

    Evaluation of the quality of episiotomy wound healing, assessed through visual inspection and clinical scoring at 40 days postpartum. Higher scores reflect better wound healing. Healing assessment was performed by the clinical care team using a standardized evaluation system to ensure consistency across participants.

    Time frame: 40 days postpartum

Secondary outcomes

  1. Increase in Quality of Sexual Life

    Healing outcomes and sexual quality of life wIll be assessed 40 days postpartum using a 12-item questionnaire.

    Time frame: 40 days postpartum

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Saint Andrew Hospital
    Constanta, 900184, Romania
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — The study involves sensitive personal health information, including sexual function and postpartum recovery data, which are subject to strict confidentiality and privacy regulations. Participant consent for public data sharing was not obtained, and sharing of individual-level data may pose risks to participant anonymity. Only aggregate results will be reported in publications.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 18, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06978049
Lead sponsor
Saint Andrew Hospital Constanta
Collaborators
Ovidius University of Constanta
Responsible party
Brezeanu Dragos (Principal Investigator, Ovidius University of Constanta) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 18, 2025
Start date
Jan 31, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2023
Completion
Dec 31, 2023
Last update
May 18, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion