ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06970730Updated May 14, 2025

Accuracy of Virtual Surgical Planning and Patient Specific Implants in Craniomaxillofacial Reconstruction

An interventional study of virtual surgical planning and patient specific implants in craniomaxillofacial reconstruction in Craniofacial Surgery and Virtual Surgical Planning, sponsored by Hams Hamed Abdelrahman. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 10 Years to 47 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-14.

Sponsored by Hams Hamed Abdelrahman · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 years 2 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Feb 2021, registered Apr 2025).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
15
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
10 Years to 47 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The sample will consist of 10 patients who will need reconstruction of craniomaxillofacial deformities and defects. The patients will be operated in the Maxillofacial and Plastic Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt. All patients will be assessed clinically and radiographically using computed tomography (CT) then virtual surgical planning and custom made patient specific implant will be manufactured. Post-operative clinical evaluation will be done and radiographic evaluation of all patients will be done by CT scan

Read the detailed description

The primary outcome of the study is to evaluate the accuracy of virtual surgical planning and patient specific implants in craniomaxillofacial reconstruction based on radiographic measurements to calculate the angulation deviations of anatomic landmarks between the pre-operative virtual plan and the post-operative actual surgical outcome.

The secondary outcome is long term follow up of the patients clinically and radiographically regarding aesthetics, quality of life and post-operative complications.

02

Conditions studied

  • Craniofacial Surgery
  • Virtual Surgical Planning
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Hams Hamed Abdelrahman is the lead sponsor of 111 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
10 Years to 47 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Reconstruction of craniofacial, midface, and mandibular bony defects and deformities secondary to:
  • Trauma.
  • Tumor resection (either by immediate or delayed reconstruction).
  • Complex congenital and dentofacial deformities.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with special needs.
  • Medically compromised patients who are not fit for surgery.
  • Irradiated patients.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
15 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    virtual surgical planning and patient specific implants in craniomaxillofacial reconstruction.

    Procedure: virtual surgical planning and patient specific implants in craniomaxillofacial reconstruction

Interventions

  • Procedurevirtual surgical planning and patient specific implants in craniomaxillofacial reconstruction

    Image acquisition by computed tomography (CT slice thickness 1 mm or less) + laser scanning of patient models. Virtual surgical planning and design of patient specific implants. Patient specific implants manufacturing (milling technique) and 3D printing of surgical guides and fit models.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Distance deviation

    the accuracy of reconstruction, defined as linear deviations of anatomic landmarks between the virtual plan and the actual surgical outcome using CT scans

    Time frame: Immediate post operative

  2. Angular deviation

    the accuracy of reconstruction, defined as angulation deviations of anatomic landmarks between the virtual plan and the actual surgical outcome using CT scans

    Time frame: Immediate post operative

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in post operative aesthetic results of surgery

    aesthetic scale from zero to 5 * 5 points - changes are not visually noticeable. * 4 points - changes in appearance are barely noticeable and do not affect the patient's quality of life. * 3 points - aesthetic deficit that does not require surgical correction. * 2 points - aesthetic defects require minor surgical corrections in the postoperative period. * 1 point - significant aesthetic defects require serious (often multi-stage surgical correction). * 0 points - the presence of severe aesthetic defects that cannot be eliminated.

    Time frame: 1 week, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 6 months

  2. change in Quality of Life (QOL)

    Scores as follow 0 = much better. 1. = better. 2. = the same. 3. = worse. 4. = much worse

    Time frame: 1 week, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Outpatient Clinic of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt
    Alexandria, Azarita 00203, Egypt
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Feb 2021 to primary completion in Jan 2025, 47 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 27, 2025
First posted
May 14, 2025
StartActual
Feb 1, 2021
Primary completionActual
Jan 1, 2025
CompletionActual
Jan 1, 2025
Last update
May 14, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 14, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06970730
Responsible party
Hams Hamed Abdelrahman (Lecturer of Dental Public Health and biostatistical consultanat, Alexandria University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
May 14, 2025
Start date
Feb 1, 2021
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2025
Completion
Jan 1, 2025
Last update
May 14, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion