CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06947018Updated Apr 27, 2025

Impact Evaluation of Türkiye's Adolescent Girls' and Boys' Empowerment Programme for Elimination of Child Marriage

An interventional study of Adolescent Girls' and Boys' Empowerment Program in Marriage Age and Marriage, sponsored by UNICEF. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Turkey. Open to female participants aged 12 Years to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-27.

Sponsored by UNICEF · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Oct 2025, 11 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
820
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
12 Years to 17 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Low income, refugee, displaced and disaster affected populations face a variety of protection risks, including higher risk of child, early and forced marriage and unions (CEFMU). This is the case in Türkiye, where low income, refugee populations and those affected by the 2023 earthquake in Southern and Central Türkiye face elevated risk of child marriage. As part of the UNICEF Türkiye Country Office (TCO) commitment to implement comprehensive interventions that aim to contribute to a change in social norms and attitudes towards gender equality, the CO and partners have developed the "Adolescent Girls' and Boys' Empowerment for Elimination of Child Marriage" program (hereafter "the program"). The program is an 8-week group-based empowerment and life skills training for adolescent girls aged 12 - 18 years old, a 4-session adolescent boys awareness training, and a one-time awareness raising seminar for caregivers. The current trial has the overall objective of evaluating the short-term causal impact of the program with respect to CEFMU and related outcomes for adolescent girls. The trial design is an individual randomized control trial, allocating 820 households with adolescent girls to either treatment or control on a 1:1 basis. The primary data collection includes a pre- and post-intervention caregiver and adolescent face-to-face survey, as well as a one-time qualitative data collection. The trial results will inform the future operation and scale-up of the program, as well as contribute to the broader evidence base on what works to increase the empowerment of adolescent girls and reduce CEFMU.

Read the detailed description

Low income, refugee, displaced and disaster affected populations face a variety of protection risks, including higher risk of child, early and forced marriage and unions (CEFMU). This is the case in Türkiye, where low income, refugee populations and those affected by the 2023 earthquake in Southern and Central Türkiye face elevated risk of child marriage. As part of the UNICEF Türkiye Country Office (TCO) commitment to implement comprehensive interventions that aim to contribute to a change in social norms and attitudes towards gender equality, the CO and partners have developed the "Adolescent Girls' and Boys' Empowerment for Elimination of Child Marriage" program (hereafter "the program"). The program is an 8-week group-based empowerment and life skills training for adolescent girls aged 12 - 18 years old, a 4-session adolescent boys awareness training and a one-time awareness raising seminar for caregivers. The current trial has the overall objective of evaluating the short-term causal impact of the program with respect to CEFMU and related outcomes for adolescent girls. The trial seeks to answer the following evaluation questions:

    1. Does the program improve participant adolescent girls' agency, self-confidence, and gender-equitable attitudes (including for CEFMU), and to what extent?
    1. Does the program improve the household enabling environment, including gender-equitable attitudes (including CEFMU), social support, protective behaviors against CEFMU, and use of social services among participating caregivers and in the broader community, and to what extent?
    1. Does the program reduce CEFMU for adolescent girls, and to what extent?
    1. Through which pathways (or combination of pathways) do potential impacts occur?
    1. Was the program implemented in a manner to maximize potential impacts? and
    1. What is the return-on-investment (cost-benefit calculation) for the program? The trial design is an individual randomized control trial, allocating 820 households with adolescent girls to either treatment or control on a 1:1 basis. The primary data collection includes a pre- and post-intervention caregiver and adolescent face-to-face survey, as well as a one-time qualitative data collection. The trial results will inform the future operation and scale-up of the program, as well as contribute to the broader evidence base on what works to increase the empowerment of adolescent girls and reduce CEFMU.
02

Conditions studied

  • Marriage Age
  • Marriage

Keywords

  • Child marriage
  • Adolescent empowerment
  • Refugees
  • Life skills
03

In context

Lead sponsor

UNICEF is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria (primary study participant, however note that primary female caregivers and siblings will be invited to participate in the study pending inclusion of primary study participant):

  • Adolescent girls aged 12 - 17 years
  • Unmarried girls
  • Have never previously been exposed to the intervention
  • Live in a family or household with at least one adult caregiver
  • Live in a family who are social service clients of the implementing partner
  • Live in a family who are risk-assessed as 'low' or 'medium' on the family risk assessment tool
  • Live in a family which is planning on staying in the catchment area of the intervention in the subsequent 6-months

Exclusion criteria:

  • Adolescent girls younger than 12 or older than 17 years
  • Girls who are married or cohabiting
  • Previously been exposed to the intervention
  • Are in institutionalized or non-family-based care
  • Live in a family who are not social service clients of the implementing partner
  • Live in a family who are risk-assessed as 'high' or 'highest' on the family risk assessment tool
  • Live in a family which is planning on moving outside the catchment area of the intervention in the subsequent 6-months
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
820 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Adolescent Girls' and Boys' Empowerment Program

    Adolescent Girls' and Boys' Empowerment Program for Elimination of Child Marriage

    Behavioral: Adolescent Girls' and Boys' Empowerment Program

  • No intervention
    Control

    Business as usual (delayed intervention, post-trial - if funding allows)

Interventions

  • BehavioralAdolescent Girls' and Boys' Empowerment Program

    The program was developed based on a social behavioural change (SBC) approach in order to change attitudes and behaviours of the participants, consisting of the following main activities on a 6 - 8 week cycle. * Girls' Empowerment Training: Workshops comprise six sessions of approximately 80 minutes each, held separately with girls aged 12-15 and 16-18 years in groups of approximately 12-20 adolescents on a range of life skill themes. * Boys' Awareness Raising Training: Similar to the girls' training, four workshops are organized for boys aged 12-15 and 16-18 years, in separate sessions, with similar length and group size. * Awareness Raising Seminars to Caregivers: Caregivers (e.g., mothers, fathers) are invited to a one-time seminar focused on the negative outcomes of child marriage and role of caregivers in preventing child marriage, lasting approximately one hour and conducted separately for fathers and mothers to eventually influence social norms in the family and communities.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of girls married or cohabiting

    Marriage or cohabitation status measured among adolescent girls

    Time frame: Baseline and 8-weeks post-intervention

  2. Score on new general self-efficacy scale (short form, higher is better)

    Eight-item scale asking about internal efficacy, with response options on a five-point scale, ranging from 1 = strongly disagree, to 5 = strongly agree (score ranges from 8 - 40). Widely used scale for individual ability to achieve goals across a range of different situations, despite difficulties. Interpreted as a sub-component of the construct of adolescent girls' agency.

    Time frame: Baseline and 8-weeks post-intervention

  3. Score on decision-making scale (higher is better)

    Ten-item scale asking about freedom to make choices across domains, with response options on a four-point scale, ranging from 1 = not at all, to 4 = a large extent (score ranges from 10 - 40). Adapted from the program version of the women's empowerment in agriculture index (pro-WEAI) to include adolescent-specific questions, previously piloted in Ethiopia among male and female youth. Interpreted as a sub-component of the construct of adolescent girls' agency.

    Time frame: Baseline and 8-weeks post-intervention

  4. Score on voice scale (higher is better)

    Eight-item scale asking about girls' ability to share feelings and speak up in different scenarios, with response options on a four-point scale, ranging from 1 = never, to 4 = all of the time (score ranges from 8 - 32). Voice scale is adapted from Global Early Adolescent Survey and interpreted as a sub-component of the construct of adolescent girls' agency.

    Time frame: Baseline and 8-weeks post-intervention

  5. Score on child marriage attitudes scale (higher is better)

    Thirteen-item scale developed and piloted in Türkiye by the author team to measure child marriage attitudes, with response options on a four-point scale, ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 4 = strongly agree. The scale is measured among adolescent girls and boys, as well as their caregivers (score ranges from 13 - 52).

    Time frame: Baseline and 8-weeks post-intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Scale of perceived social support (higher is better).

    The family and friends' sub-scales of the multi-dimensional scale of perceived social support (MSPSS) consisting of nine questions answered on a four-point scale, ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 4 = strongly agree. The scale is measured among adolescent girls and ranges from 9 - 36.

    Time frame: Baseline and 8-weeks post-intervention

  2. The Balanced Cohesion subscale of the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale (higher is better)

    The Balanced Cohesion subscale of the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale is a seven-item scale answered on a five-point scale, ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree. The scale is measured among caregivers and ranges from 7 - 35.

    Time frame: Baseline and 8-weeks post-intervention

  3. The Revised Family Communication Pattern Instrument Conversation Orientation Sub-scale (higher is better)

    The Revised Family Communication Pattern Instrument Conversation Orientation Sub-scale measures parent-adolescent communication and is a 15-item scale answered on a five-point scale, ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree. The scale is administered to caregivers and ranges from 15 - 75.

    Time frame: Baseline and 8-weeks post-intervention

  4. Score on willingness to intervene and speak out for girls' scale (higher is better)

    Willingness to speak out and take action to support girls measured using simple self-reported questions on willingness to speak up against harmful behaviors: 1) child marriage, 2) violence against girls, 3) girls' rights and 4) for girls in times of need. These four domains are each assessed using one question answered on a four-point scale, ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 4 = strongly agree. The scale is measured among adolescent boys and caregivers and ranges from 4 - 32.

    Time frame: Baseline and 8-weeks post-intervention

  5. Linkages to services scale (higher is better)

    Received assistance or benefits from services measured among adolescent girls and caregivers, collected as a simple sum = 1 if received any services from: 1) health, 2) social, or 3) legal services (ranges from 0 - 3)

    Time frame: 8-weeks post-intervention

07

Study locations

1 site
  • UNICEF Türkiye
    Ankara, Turkey
    • Irem Derya Caglayan, M.Sc. · Contact · icaglayan@unicef.org · +905342974222
    • Pinar Öktem Arikan, Ph.D. · Contact · poktem@unicef.org · +905359237280
    • Tuna Kılınç, M.Sc. · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Data from the trial will be owned by UNICEF and efforts will be made to share the deindentified data in a public repository, pending UNICEF approval. In addition, it is expected that de-identified replication files will be made publicly available upon the publication of any journal articles to allow the reproduction of all tables, figures and results, alongside statistical replication code.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Analytic code

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 27, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06947018
Lead sponsor
UNICEF
Responsible party
Yasemin Kisbu (Impact Evaluation Consultant, UNICEF) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 27, 2025
Start date
Apr 21, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 30, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 30, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 27, 2025

Study contacts

Yasemin Kisbu, Ph.D.
Contact
ykisbu@unicef.org
+90 532 215 37 90
Amber Peterman, Ph.D.
Contact
apeterman@unicef.org
360-472-1349
Zlata Bruckauf, Ph.D.
study director · UNICEF

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion