An Early Phase 1 interventional study of Girls Invest and Waitlist control in Risk Factors for Intimate Partner Violence, sponsored by San Diego State University. Completed at 1 site in Nigeria. Open to female participants aged 15 Years to 19 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-27.
Sponsored by San Diego State University · Early Phase 1, Interventional, and Prevention
The research aims to refine and evaluate Girls Invest, a newly developed economic empowerment intervention, to reduce economic and social risks associated with high rates of intimate partner violence (IPV) among adolescent girls in Ibadan, Nigeria. Girls Invest, initially developed and tested in the US, has been adapted for use in Nigeria via Phase I Wellspring support. Girls Invest participants complete gender equity and financial skills training modules via a mobile "app." Upon completion, each participant receives a financial resource of supporting girls' education/vocation (e.g., sewing machine, baking oven and pans, or funds to cover educational exams).
Adolescent girls residing in low-income communities in Nigeria experience high rates of IPV. Economic vulnerability contributes to these high rates of IPV in two major ways: 1) Economic vulnerability increases financial reliance on male partners; IPV is common in these partnerships with males and financial reliance on males decreases girls' ability to leave abusive partnerships. 2) Economic vulnerability can intersect with gender-based constraints (e.g. low prioritization of limited household resources for girls' education) and create low expectations of educational/career opportunities, which can shift girls' priorities away from the participants future training/education and increase intentions to find a male partner and start a family - thereby, increasing girls' risk for relying financially on male partners and risk for IPV. By promoting young females' financial knowledge as well as social/economic expectations and opportunities, Girls Invest seeks to decrease economic vulnerability, reduce girls' financial reliance on male partnerships, and reduce girls' risk for IPV.
First, the investigators aim to pilot Girls Invest with 20 adolescent females ages 15-19; assessments will include quantitative app-based surveys and focus group discussions to assess initial feasibility, acceptability and fidelity of implementation. The investigators will refine Girls Invest with consultation from a community advisory board. Second, to determine preliminary efficacy, the investigators will implement a 2-armed randomized-controlled trial, randomizing 240 adolescent girls ages 15-19 to the Girls Invest intervention or a wait-list control condition.
Girls Invest expands previous work on economic interventions for reducing IPV, and also employs innovative mobile technology methodologies. The proposed research has potential for high impact, particularly given the increase in economic vulnerability as a result of COVID-19, especially among girls who were already living in poverty prior to the pandemic, as well as the coinciding reports of increased IPV.
San Diego State University is the lead sponsor of 145 studies on the registry; 41 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Girls Invest is an app-based economic empowerment intervention to address social and economic factors associated with IPV among girls ages 15-19 in low-income communities in Ibadan, Nigeria.
Behavioral: Girls Invest
Participants receive the intervention after they complete the 6 month follow-up survey
Behavioral: Waitlist control
The Girls Invest intervention involved: 1) app-based trainings on topics related to financial literacy, gender equity, and health and 2) financial resources/incentives supporting girls' education/career.
Participants receive Girls Invest after they complete the 6 month follow-up survey.
Attitudes supportive of traditional gender roles: Gender Equitable Men (GEM) Scale
seven items adapted from Gender Equitable Men (GEM) Scale assessing male and female roles in the following: decision-making (e.g., when to have sex, household purchases), household chores, childcare, reproductive decisions (including pregnancy prevention), and in receiving education/training. Responses involved 5-point Likert scales ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree.
Time frame: baseline to 6 months follow up
Attitudes supportive of IPV: Items adapted from Demographic Health Surveys
7 validated items adapted from Demographic Health Surveys asking whether any of the following scenarios a husband has good reason to hit his wife: (1) She does not complete housework to his satisfaction, (2) She disobeys him, (3) She refuses to have sexual relations with him, (4) She asks him whether he has other girlfriends, (5) He finds out she has been unfaithful, (6) She goes out without telling him, or (7) She does not prepare a meal to his satisfaction. Responses involved 5-point Likert scales ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree.
Time frame: baseline to 6 months follow up
Coping with experiences of gender-based discrimination
three items assessing perceived ability to identify instances of "gender-based discrimination against me" and coping with such experiences as being able to "take care of myself," and recognizing that such experiences are not "about anything I did as an individual; items developed based on previous literature on the topic and investigator's previous research, given the absence of a validated scale. Measure was piloted with 5 participants and refined prior to implementation.
Time frame: baseline to 6 months follow up
Perceptions of economic vulnerability
eight items asking about perceived household economic situation, including having enough money to purchase basic necessities (e.g., food, clothes, other needs) and money to pay for education/training of the participant. Items also assessed perceived financial stress of the household. Responses involved 5-point Likert scales ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree. Scale was developed based on investigator's research and existing literature on this topic, given the lack of a validated scale. It was piloted among 5 participants prior to implementation.
Time frame: baseline to 6 months follow up
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: No
This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
San Diego State University