CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06937658RAPTOR-CIEDUpdated Jan 7, 2026

Remote Alert Pathway To Optimize CaRe of Cardiac Implantable Electrical Devices

An interventional study of Alert-based care and Guideline-based care in Pacemaker DDD and Implantable Defibrillator User, sponsored by Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-07.

Sponsored by Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2026, 3 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started May 2025; still recruiting 1 year 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The Remote Alert Pathway to Optimize Care of Cardiac Implantable Electrical Devices (RAPTOR-CIED) Study is a pragmatic, multi-center, randomized trial with 1:1 patient-level randomization comparing the safety and effectiveness of alert-driven care versus guideline-based care for patients with wireless cardiac implantable electrical devices (CIEDs).

The study will be conducted in 2 phases: a Feasibility Phase and a Main Phase. This registration outlines the goals and design features of the Feasibility Phase of the study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pacemaker DDD
  • Implantable Defibrillator User
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 560 studies on the registry; 80 are open to participants now.

Of its 75 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 61 (81%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Adult aged > 18 years
  2. Clinically stable by investigator assessment
  3. Has a newly implanted or existing wireless CIED: single, dual-chamber, biventricular, subcutaneous/extravascular, and leadless systems are all eligible, including pacemakers or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs)
  4. CIED is from one of the 4 major CIED manufacturers in the US market (99% of implants in the US): Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott, Biotronik
  5. Currently enrolled in remote monitoring as part of standard of care
  6. Primary clinical electrophysiology follow-up at the enrolling center
  7. Understands spoken and written English, Spanish, or Portuguese
  8. Has sufficient cognitive function to answer standardized questions about study rationale and procedures.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Presence of insertable cardiac monitor, either in isolation or in combination with any other CIED
  2. Listed for cardiac transplantation prior to enrollment (N.B. if a patient becomes listed for transplantation during the study, they may continue study participation)
  3. Participation in another study related to novel CIED technology or remote monitoring.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Guideline-based Care

    Remote monitoring programming scheduled for alert transmissions, patient-initiated transmissions, and routine transmissions (scheduled to occur every 90 days from the date of enrollment in the study); in-office interrogations on at least an annual basis

    Device: Guideline-based care

  • Active comparator
    Alert-based Care

    Remote monitoring programming scheduled for alert transmissions and patient-initiated transmissions only

    Device: Alert-based care

Interventions

  • DeviceAlert-based care

    Alert-based care is an alternative strategy for longitudinal management of patients with wireless pacemakers and implantable defibrillators

  • DeviceGuideline-based care

    Guideline-based care is the current typical standard for longitudinal management of patients with wireless pacemakers and implantable defibrillators

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Enrollment

    Number of patients enrolled and randomized per site and per month, and cumulatively

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Adherence

    Proportion of cross-over

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Major adverse cardiac events

    Incidence of MACE (i.e., death, stroke or systemic embolism, and unplanned cardiac device procedure)

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Major adverse cardiac events

    Incidence of arrhythmia events, individual components of MACE, and health services use (i.e., hospital presentations)

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Effectiveness

    Total number and type of device related encounters

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Effectiveness

    Proportion of total device related encounters that are actionable (e.g., changes in programming or treatment)

    Time frame: 6 months

  5. Connectivity

    • Proportion of 24-, 48-, and 72-hour periods with versus without connected wireless monitoring

    Time frame: 6 months

  6. Quality of Life and Health Status

    EuroQol 5-dimensional questionnaire, five-level version (EQ-5D-5L) - 5 questions are scored from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months

  7. Quality of Life and Health Status

    Cardiac Anxiety Questionnaire (CAQ) - scored from 0 to 72, with a higher score corresponding to higher cardiac anxiety

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months

  8. Quality of Life and Health Status

    Patient Health Questionnaire depression scale (PHQ-8) - scored from 0 to 24, with a higher score indicating worse symptoms

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months

  9. Quality of Life and Health Status

    Patient Activation Measure (PAM) - scored from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better outcomes

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
    Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 7, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06937658
Lead sponsor
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Collaborators
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
Responsible party
Daniel B. Kramer (Associate Professor of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 22, 2025
Start date
May 1, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 7, 2026

Study contacts

Linda Valsdottir, MS
Contact
lvalsdot@bidmc.harvard.edu
6176678800

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion