A Phase 2 interventional study of Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection in Testicular Cancer, sponsored by Western University, Canada. Recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Open to male participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-20.
Sponsored by Western University, Canada · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment
Testicular cancer represents 1% of adult neoplasms and is the most common solid malignancy in young men. At diagnosis, approximately 90% of cases are germ cell tumours (GCT), categorised as either seminoma (55-60%) or non-seminoma types (40-45%).
For many years, the management of patients with CS IIA/B seminoma and retroperitoneal lymph node involvement ≤ 3 cm are eligible for treatment with either radiotherapy or chemotherapy Despite high cure rates for CS II seminoma (approximately 90%) with chemotherapy or radiotherapy, concerns persist regarding short and long-term treatment-related toxicities (such as increased risks of cardiovascular disease and secondary malignancies As such, an alternative strategy which has been explored in this study is the role of RPLND for the management of these patients
Testicular cancer represents 1% of adult neoplasms and is the most common solid malignancy in young men. At diagnosis, approximately 90% of cases are germ cell tumours (GCT), categorised as either seminoma (55-60%) or non-seminoma types (40-45%). Approximately 20% of men with seminoma present with clinical stage (CS) II disease, characterized by enlarged retroperitoneal lymph nodes without distant metastasis.
For many decades for patients who recur following CS 1 seminoma or present with de novo CS IIA/B seminoma, either radiotherapy (30-36Gy) or chemotherapy (BEPx3, EPx4) has been the mainstay of treatment. Yet, both treatment paradigms carry significant short and long-term treatment-related toxicities. Radiotherapy, when compared to surveillance or surgery alone, has been shown to double the risk of cardiovascular disease and secondary malignancies (with an incidence of 2-3%). Additionally, patients who receive chemotherapy for GCTs can develop complications including irreversible neurotoxicity (10%), ototoxicity (5-12%), pulmonary toxicity, which may result in permanent restrictive lung disease (8%), metabolic syndrome (10-16%), and hypogonadism (4%). Additionally, patients are at an approximate 3-7-fold increase in cardiovascular mortality and a two-fold increase in secondary solid malignancies and leukaemia. Furthermore, both treatment modalities can harm fertility potential by approximately 20-30%.
However, in the past few years, a number of prospective single arm studies have been published evaluating the role of RPLND. RPLND is an appealing choice for patients with low-volume metastatic seminoma for several reasons: Firstly, seminoma exhibits a more indolent biological behaviour and a predictable lymphatic spread pattern compared to non-seminoma diseases, potentially allowing a greater chance of cure with surgery alone. Secondly, RPLND enables precise pathological staging which can avoid overtreatment in those with pathologically negative lymph nodes. It offers an opportunity to reduce the burden of chemotherapy by reserving this treatment only for the small proportion of men who will relapse following RPLND. Finally, RPLND offers an acceptably low risk of short or long-term complications when performed at experienced centres.
Therefore, our objective is to prospectively evaluate the short and long-term safety and efficacy of Primary Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection (RPLND) for patients with testicular seminoma and limited retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis.
295 studies on the registry are indexed under Testicular Neoplasms; 51 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 50 across 190 interventional studies indexed under Testicular Neoplasms.
Browse Testicular Neoplasms studies →Western University, Canada is the lead sponsor of 224 studies on the registry; 56 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Axial imaging of lymphadenopathy within 8 weeks of the date of RPLND
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients with relapsed CS I or de novo CS IIA/B with \<3cm lymph node in the retroperitoneal lymph node.
Procedure: Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection
Open bilateral nerve-sparing RPLND.
Recurrence Free Survival
2-year RFS (absence of radiological metastases on cross-sectional imaging and normal serum tumour markers).
Time frame: 2 years
Complications
Complications post RPLND (Clavein-Dindo)
Time frame: 90 days
Length of Stay in hospital
Length of stay in hospital post RPLND
Time frame: 90 days
Treatment-Free Survival
Patients avoiding additional treatments for seminoma post RPLND (e.g. chemotherapy / radiotherapy)
Time frame: 24 months
Cancer-specific Survival
Percentage of people who have not died from testicular cancer during follow-up
Time frame: 24 months
Overall Survival
Patients alive during follow-up
Time frame: 2 years
Plan to share: Undecided
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.