CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06928831Updated Apr 24, 2025

The Effect of Teaching Methods on Urinary Catheterization

An interventional study of Experimental and Experimental in Nursing Students, sponsored by Inonu University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-24.

Sponsored by Inonu University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 10 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jun 2023, registered Apr 2025).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
92
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Aim: This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of flipped learning and mobile learning methods on nursing students' urinary catheterization application knowledge, skills and self-efficacy level.

Material and Method: The study was conducted as a pretest-posttest randomized controlled experimental research model. It was conducted between June 2023 and April 2025 at Inonu University Faculty of Nursing. The population of the study consisted of all first-year students studying in the department of nursing. The sample consisted of 92 students (Group flipped learning: 30, Group mobile application: 32 and Group control: 30) determined by power analysis. "Individual introduction form", 'Urinary system applications skill evaluation form', 'Knowledge test for urinary system applications' and 'Student self-efficacy scale' were used to collect the data. During the research process, students in the experimental groups were taught with flipped learning and mobile learning methods for two weeks. Students in the control group continued the routine theoretical and practical process.

Read the detailed description

The Flipped Learning method combines online (prior knowledge acquisition) and face-to-face (learning practices) techniques to offer a learning environment in which the educator takes on a guiding role and the learners are actively engaged in learning experiences. Mobile learning method, on the other hand, provides individualised learning opportunities, enabling students to access educational materials anytime and anywhere and to gain self-managed learning skills. Since this method provides individualised learning opportunities and increases educator-learner interaction, its use in education is becoming increasingly widespread. In this study, both methods were evaluated together and their effects on the development of nursing students' competencies for urinary system practices were evaluated.

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)

02

Conditions studied

  • Nursing Students

Keywords

  • Nursing students,
  • Mobile learning,
  • Flipped learning,
  • Self-Efficacy,
  • Urinary Catheterization
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Inonu University is the lead sponsor of 375 studies on the registry; 86 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Being 18 or over
  • To be enrolled in the 1st year of nursing,
  • To receive training on urinary system applications for the first time,
  • To have no physical disabilities related to vision, hearing and motor skills,
  • To have a smart mobile phone with Android/IOS operating system,
  • To volunteer to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Repeating the course,
  • Not having a smart mobile phone with Android / IOS operating system,
  • Not volunteering to participate in the research.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
92 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimetal 1

    Flipped learning

    Other: Experimental

  • Experimental
    Experimetal 2

    Mobil learning

    Other: Experimental

Interventions

  • OtherExperimental

    Course materials were shared with the students in the flipped group one week before the theoretical lesson. Google Classroom platform was used so that students could easily access these materials and repeat them at any time and frequency they wanted. A link and QR code were shared with the students to log in to the system. The frequency of downloading and watching the course materials was monitored by the researcher. Next week, the theoretical course was taught in line with the flipped learning model.

  • OtherExperimental

    The link to the mobile application developed for mobile learning was shared with the students in this group. Students were given 2 weeks to use the application, and students had the opportunity to read and watch the content in the application at any time and frequency they wanted.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Efeect of knowledge level

    For the pre-test data, 'Individual Introduction Form' and 'Knowledge Test on Urinary System Practices' were given to the students and they were asked to fill them in. At the end of 2 weeks, the 'Knowledge Test for Urinary System Practices' was applied again at the end of the 2nd week to see the change in the knowledge levels of the students who were trained with different teaching methods for 2 weeks. There were 25 questions in the knowledge test and 8 experts in the field of nursing were consulted for the questions.

    Time frame: 2 weeks later

  2. Effect of psychomotor skills

    In order to evaluate the psychomotor skill level of the students in the groups, the researcher and the independent observer evaluated the urinary system application skills of each student individually and filled out the 'Urinary System Applications Skill Evaluation Form'. The skill evaluation process of each student lasted 10-15 minutes. Skill checklists were developed to evaluate the skill performance of students on urinary system applications. Skill checklists are step-by-step checklists showing the skills expected to be performed by students and were prepared by reviewing the relevant current literature.

    Time frame: 2 weeks later

  3. Effect of Self-Efficacy

    The validity-reliability analysis of the scale developed by Rowbotham and Schmitz to determine the self-efficacy levels of students on nursing students was conducted by Yurtçiçek Eren and Başgöl in 2023. Permission was obtained from the authors for the use of the scale. The scale is four-point Likert-type and has one sub-dimension. The scoring of the scale is '1' Strongly Disagree, '4' Strongly Agree. A score between 10 and 40 can be obtained from the scale, and higher scores indicate an increased sense of self-efficacy.

    Time frame: 2 weeks later

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Inonu University
    Malatya, 44280, Turkey
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Gulec HY, Aslan H. The effect of conscience perception on job satisfaction and care behaviours in nurses. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2024 Jun;50:49-59. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2024.03.008. Epub 2024 Mar 11. PubMed 38789233 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 24, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06928831
Lead sponsor
Inonu University
Responsible party
Hakime Aslan (Principal Investigator, Inonu University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 15, 2025
Start date
Jun 1, 2023
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2023
Completion
Apr 1, 2025
Last update
Apr 24, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion