ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06927232Updated Apr 15, 2025

AZA+Lus VS AZA Monotherapy in HR-MDS

A Phase 3 interventional study of Azacitidine (AZA) and Luspatercept in Higher-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome, sponsored by Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-15.

Sponsored by Peking Union Medical College Hospital · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jan 2026, 9 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
86
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 19 studies testing luspatercept in Myelodysplastic Syndromes — 7 open to participants now, 13 under way, 7 of them phase 3. luspatercept · Myelodysplastic Syndromes.

Planned enrollment
9th of 19
86 · median 75
Started
2025
the only one that year
Phase 3
8 of 19
3 open now
Primary completion
2026-01
later than 4 of 12 live
Registered
18th of 19
by date
Lead sponsor
2 of 19
Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Among the 19 studies testing luspatercept in Myelodysplastic Syndromes, this one is the 9th largest by planned enrollment, is the only one that started in 2025, is one of 8 in phase 3, reaches primary completion later than 4 of the 12 other live ones, and was the 18th registered.

Myelodysplastic Syndromes

1,997 studies on the registry are indexed under Myelodysplastic Syndromes; 324 are open to participants now.

Browse Myelodysplastic Syndromes studies →

Open to participants now

7 of the 19 studies testing luspatercept in Myelodysplastic Syndromes are open now, in 12 countries. Recruiting first, the newest first:

1 more — sign in →

By country, each count listing its studies:

All 7 open studies →

About luspatercept

luspatercept: first FDA approval 2019 (REBLOZYL), first EMA approval 2020. What it is approved for, and how studies give it, is on its page →

Who these studies take

Of the 264 Myelodysplastic Syndromes studies recruiting now, 167 (63%) set no upper age limit and 70 (27%) stop at 75 or younger; 57 take children under 18; 17 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 19 studies testing luspatercept in Myelodysplastic Syndromes, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

This study is a randomized, prospective, single-center, open-label cohort study involving untreated HR-MDS patients. The patients were divided randomized into AZA+Lus cohort and AZA monotherapy cohort.

Read the detailed description

The hypomethylating agents (HMA) azacitidine (AZA) and decitabine (DEC) have been shown to improve survival and delay disease progression in patients with high-risk MDS. They are recommended by the NCCN as first-line treatments for patients with high-risk MDS. Clinical trials have demonstrated an OR rate of approximately 40-50% with AZA in patients with high-risk MDS. Despite the efficacy of HMA therapy, the rate of transfusion independence remains low. Anemia remains the most prominent symptom in refractory patients, with very limited options for subsequent treatment. Prolonged anemia affects every organ function and seriously affects the prognosis of patients.

Luspatercept is currently approved for the treatment of patients with both erythropoiesis receptor agonist ( ESA) treatment failures in transfusion-dependent low-risk MDS-RS patients. In a randomized controlled phase III clinical trial, compared to a placebo group, luspatercept significantly improved transfusion dependence and improved hemoglobin and quality of life in refractory MDS-RS patients. A recent conference report suggested that there was no significant difference in efficacy between low-risk and high-risk patients treated with luspatercept and that the HI rate for high-risk patients treated with luspatercept monotherapy was approximately 50%.

Thus this study aimed to compare the efficacy of AZA+luspatercept and AZA monotherapy.

03

Conditions studied

  • Higher-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Keywords

  • luspatercept
  • azacitidine
  • higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18 years old
  • Diagnosed as higher-risk MDS (IPSS intermediate-2/high-risk, or IPSS-R >3.5, or IPSS-M moderate high-, high-, very high-risk)
  • Untreated patients
  • Liver and kidney function less than 2 times of
  • ≤2 and expected survival more than 6 months
  • signed

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • With active infection
  • Other malignant tumors
  • Obvious abnormal liver and kidney function, or abnormal function of other organs
  • Combined with myelofibrosis
  • Have undergone bone marrow transplantation
  • Pregnant or lactating women, or men who have recent reproductive needs
  • Allergic to azacytidine, Rotercept or
  • History of polysorbate 80 allergy
  • Refuse to sign
  • Researchers consider it inappropriate to participate in the experiment
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
86 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Azacitidine+Luspatercept

    Drug: Azacitidine (AZA) · Drug: Luspatercept

  • Active comparator
    Azacitidine

    Drug: Azacitidine (AZA)

Interventions

  • Azacitidine 75mg/m/ day \*5 days, 28 days for 1 course

  • Luspatercept 1.0 mg/kg subcutaneously every 3 weeks, adjusted according to hemoglobin, up to 1.75mg/kg. If hemoglobin ≥120g/L, luspatercept can be discontinued.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. overall response rate

    Time frame: 3 months, 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. complete response rate

    Time frame: 3 months, 6 months

  2. rate of transfusion independence

    Time frame: 3 months, 6 months

  3. adverse event rate

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  4. relapse rate

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  5. progress-free survival

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  6. overall survival

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Apr 2025; primary completion for Jan 2026, 9 months later.

Of 45 phase 3 interventional studies under Myelodysplastic Syndromes, half reached primary completion within 50 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 38 and three quarters within 95. This study's planned 9 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 1, 2025
First posted
Apr 15, 2025
StartEst.
Apr 2025
Primary completionEst.
Jan 31, 2026
CompletionEst.
Jan 31, 2027
Last update
Apr 15, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 15, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06927232
Responsible party
Bing Han (Professor, Peking Union Medical College Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 15, 2025
Start date
Apr 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 15, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Luspatercept

Start the discussion