CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06926270Updated Sep 10, 2026

Effectiveness of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Treatment in Patients Diagnosed With Postpolio Syndrome

An interventional study of Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and Sham rTMS in Postpolio Syndrome, sponsored by Ege University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 25 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-10.

Sponsored by Ege University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2024, registered Apr 2025).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
28
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
25 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial evaluated the effects of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the primary motor cortex on walking capacity, fatigue, post-polio-related symptoms, and health-related quality of life in participants with post-polio syndrome.

02

Conditions studied

  • Postpolio Syndrome

Keywords

  • Postpolio
  • poliomyelit
  • TMS
  • rTMS
  • gait speed
03

In context

Postpoliomyelitis Syndrome

27 studies on the registry are indexed under Postpoliomyelitis Syndrome; 4 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 28 is below the median of 40 across 19 interventional studies indexed under Postpoliomyelitis Syndrome.

Browse Postpoliomyelitis Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Ege University is the lead sponsor of 365 studies on the registry; 46 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
25 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:-Having been diagnosed with PPS (postpolio syndrome) -Having not received TMS treatment before

-

Exclusion Criteria:-History of epilepsy

  • Presence of another disease that may be associated with the symptoms
  • Inability to ambulate independently
  • Presence of a neurological, psychiatric or vision-related problem that may prevent the patient from answering the questionnaires
  • Presence of ferromagnetic material implanted in the body
  • Organic brain pathology (vascular, traumatic, tumoral, etc.)
  • History of use of drugs that lower the seizure threshold (if not receiving antiepileptic treatment)
  • Severe or recent heart disease
  • Alcoholism
  • Pregnancy
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
28 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Sham comparator
    Sham rTMS

    Sham stimulation followed the same treatment schedule as active rTMS, with the coil reversed and the device operated at minimum output, providing auditory input without effective cortical stimulation. Ten sessions were administered over 2 weeks. All participants received an individualized home exercise program based on limb involvement and muscle strength. Resistive exercise was limited to muscle groups graded at least 3/5 on manual muscle testing and was prescribed according to energy-conservation principles.

    Drug: Sham rTMS · Behavioral: Individualized home exercise program

  • Experimental
    Active rTMS

    Active rTMS was delivered using a Magstim Rapid2 stimulator and a figure-of-eight D70 coil (Magstim Company Ltd, Whitland, United Kingdom). The target was the lower-extremity representation of the primary motor cortex near the vertex. Stimulation was delivered at 80% of resting motor threshold, at 1 Hz for 20 minutes (1200 pulses per session), over 10 sessions in 2 weeks. All participants received an individualized home exercise program based on limb involvement and muscle strength. Resistive exercise was limited to muscle groups graded at least 3/5 on manual muscle testing and was prescribed according to energy-conservation principles.

    Device: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) · Behavioral: Individualized home exercise program

Interventions

  • DeviceRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)

    Active rTMS was delivered using a Magstim Rapid2 stimulator and a figure-of-eight D70 coil. Stimulation was applied over the lower-extremity representation of the primary motor cortex near the vertex at 1 Hz and 80% of the resting motor threshold for 20 minutes (1200 pulses per session), for 10 sessions over 2 weeks.

  • DrugSham rTMS

    Sham stimulation followed the same schedule as active rTMS, with the coil reversed and the device operated at minimum output, providing auditory input without effective cortical stimulation. Ten sessions were administered over 2 weeks.

  • BehavioralIndividualized home exercise program

    An individualized home exercise program was prescribed based on limb involvement and muscle strength. Resistive exercise was limited to muscle groups graded at least 3/5 on manual muscle testing and was prescribed according to energy-conservation principles.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 6 minute walk test (6MWT)

    It is a test used to assess the level of functional exercise or functional capacity. The patient is asked to walk, but not run, in a 25 m long corridor at the highest possible speed without stopping. At the end of 6 minutes, the number of metres walked by the patient is recorded. The 6 min walk test is an evaluation criterion used in routine and clinical research to assess functional capacity in many diseases such as heart failure, general arthrosis, multiple sclerosis.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after treatment, and 3-month follow-up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Polio-Related Problems Scale (PRPS)

    The Polio-Related Problems Scale (PRPS) assesses the severity of post-polio-related symptoms and functional problems. Higher scores indicate greater symptom burden and impairment.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after treatment, and 3-month follow-up

  2. Nottingham health profile (NHP)

    It consists of 38 items assessing how severe an impact the respondent thinks their health is having on six dimensions: sleep, physical mobility, energy, pain, emotional reactions, and social isolation. Every item has a different weight, depending on the severity of the symptom. The sum of the weighted scores is 100 for each subdimension. Thus, summing all weighted values of every item, the score between 0 and 100 is obtained for each subdimension. The total score was obtained by summing the scores of six subdimensions, giving the values between 0 and 600. Higher scores indicate a greater level of distress

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after treatment, and 3-month follow-up

  3. Visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and fatigue

    Severity of pain that the participants have had in the past week was evaluated by using visual analogue scale (VAS) on a 10-cm horizontal line where 0-cm represented "no pain" and 10 cm the "worst imaginable pain" Severity of fatigue experienced by the participants in the past week was assessed by using VAS on a 10-cm horizontal line where 0-cm represented "not tired at all" and 10-cm "extremely tired"

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after treatment, and 3-month follow-up

  4. Manual muscle testing (MMT)

    Muscle strength of the hip flexors, knee extensors, knee flexors, ankle dorsiflexors, and plantar flexors were measured bilaterally according to the Medical Research Council Scale . A sum score (manual muscle testing \[MMT\] sum) was obtained by adding the scores of all muscle groups tested (max score: 50)

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after treatment, and 3-month follow-up

  5. Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS)

    Cognitive, functional and fatigue subscales are available and high scores are associated with poor fatigue level. The scale is scored from 0 to 120 points.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after treatment, and 3-month follow-up

  6. Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)

    The Beck depression test is used to measure how intensely depressed a person is during a 1-week period.21 questions; each question is scored between 0 and 3. The degree of depression is determined according to the total score (0-9: minimal depression, 10-16: mild depression, 17-29: moderate depression, 30-63: severe depression).

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after treatment, and 3-month follow-up

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Ege University Faculty of Medicine
    Izmir, BORNOVA 35100, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Altas EU, Askin A, Besiroglu L, Tosun A. Is high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the left primary motor cortex superior to the stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in fibromyalgia syndrome? Somatosens Mot Res. 2019 Mar;36(1):56-62. doi: 10.1080/08990220.2019.1587400. Epub 2019 Apr 8. PubMed 30955403 ↗
  • Klomjai W, Katz R, Lackmy-Vallee A. Basic principles of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and repetitive TMS (rTMS). Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2015 Sep;58(4):208-213. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2015.05.005. Epub 2015 Aug 28. PubMed 26319963 ↗
  • Ertekin C, On AY, Kirazli Y, Kurt T, Gurgor N. Motor evoked responses from the thigh muscles to the stimulation of the upper limb nerves in patients with late poliomyelitis. Clin Neurophysiol. 2002 Apr;113(4):478-84. doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00043-3. PubMed 11955992 ↗
  • Willen C, Hou L, Stibrant Sunnerhagen K. A very long-term longitudinal follow-up of persons with late effects of polio. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2020 Apr;56(2):155-159. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.20.05918-3. Epub 2020 Feb 10. PubMed 32043852 ↗
  • Latifoglou E, Cinar E, Tanigor G, On AY. Coexistence of fibromyalgia and post-polio syndrome in persons with prior poliomyelitis in Turkey: the relations with symptoms, polio-related impairments, and quality of life. Disabil Rehabil. 2023 Oct;45(21):3511-3518. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2127931. Epub 2022 Sep 28. PubMed 36169616 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 10, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06926270
Lead sponsor
Ege University
Responsible party
Arzu On (Prof.Dr, Ege University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 13, 2025
Start date
Oct 1, 2024
Primary completion
Jun 20, 2025
Completion
Jul 25, 2025
Last update
Sep 10, 2026

Study contacts

Arzu On, Prof.Dr
principal investigator · Ege Universtiy

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion