CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT06923943PREDICT-NURSEUpdated Feb 27, 2026

Predicting Nurse Staffing Requirements From Routinely Collected Data

An observational study in Nursing Workload, sponsored by University of Southampton. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in United Kingdom. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-27.

Sponsored by University of Southampton · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
80
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this observational study is to find out if the researchers can predict the number of nurses needed on hospital wards (units) from patient hospital data. The main question it aims to answer is:

Is it possible to predict nurse staffing requirements from routinely recorded data in hospital systems?

Researchers will ask nurses about their views of nurse staffing tools and what support they need for staffing decisions. They will analyse data from hospital IT systems.

Read the detailed description

Background: Having enough nurses on hospital wards is vital for patient safety but planning for varying numbers and needs of patients is hard. Almost all acute NHS Trusts in England use the NICE-endorsed Safer Nursing Care Tool (SNCT) to guide staffing decisions. However, this approach is labour-intensive and necessitates the collection of data specifically to measure staffing requirements, not informed by data gathered for administration or care management.

Aim: Develop a method to measure demand for nursing staff on hospital wards using routine data to help plan establishments (number of ward employees), monitor staffing adequacy in real-time, and inform safe and efficient deployment of staff.

Design: A retrospective observational study across wards providing acute adult somatic (i.e. not mental health) inpatient care in 5 general hospital Trusts, predicting nurse staffing requirements from routinely collected data and validating these predictions against patient and staffing adequacy outcomes. Algorithms will be developed according to user-centred design and by engaging with patients to understand experiences of hospital nurse staffing and implications for developing algorithms.

Workstream (WS) 1 Objective: understand what does/does not work for nurses and managers when using staffing tools, and incorporate this into algorithm design. Method: User-centred design approach comprising i) a national survey of staffing matrons and Chief Nursing Information Officers to find out how staffing tools are used and patient data availability/quality, ii) workshops with nurses and nursing managers to understand staffing decision support needs at different timepoints, iii) workshops with this group plus NHS IT managers and roster companies to discuss algorithm design considerations.

WS2 Objective: develop statistical/machine learning algorithms to estimate nurse staffing requirements from routinely available patient data. Method: Since there is no "gold standard" for measuring nurse staffing requirements, researchers will first replicate measurements from the SNCT, a patient acuity/dependency classification tool. They will develop alternative algorithms replicating the staffing requirements for a whole ward. They will consider staffing decisions at different timepoints. Predictor variables will come from administrative and care plan data.

WS3 Objective: assess the validity of algorithms. Method: Researchers will fit regression models to investigate the associations between actual under/over-staffing relative to each candidate measure of staffing requirements and multiple outcomes. For this, they will use routine data extracted from hospital IT systems and a micro-survey of nurses to understand perceptions of staffing adequacy. They will test whether as staffing increases relative to a measure of staffing requirements, the risk of poor patient outcomes and perceptions that staffing is inadequate decreases. They will compare model fit against models with staffing requirements measured by the SNCT.

02

Conditions studied

  • Nursing Workload

Keywords

  • nurse staffing
  • workload
  • prediction
  • workforce
  • safety
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Southampton is the lead sponsor of 121 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

English NHS acute hospital Trusts

Eligibility criteria

National survey Inclusion Criteria:

  • safe staffing lead/nurse with responsibility for safe staffing or CNIO/nurse with responsibility for IT/electronic records

Workshops Inclusion Criteria:

  • nursing manager with safe staffing remit/IT remit. OR
  • clinical nurse with experience of completing Safer Nursing Care Tool ratings. OR
  • NHS IT manager with familiarity of hospital Trust's systems for storing patient data. OR
  • representative of company who provide rostering or patient information system services to hospitals.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • National survey

    We will survey staffing matrons and Chief Nursing Information Officers in England to find out how staffing tools are used and the availability/quality of patient data in IT systems.

  • Workshops

    In workshops we will 1) ask nurses and managers what problems they have with current staffing systems and what would help, 2) discuss with nurses, NHS IT managers and IT system providers ideas for building our prediction algorithms into software products.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean absolute error of prediction

    measured in whole-time-equivalents per patient. This is a measure of predictive accuracy, i.e. how well the algorithm's predictions match the target value for required nurse staffing on average across wards and shifts.

    Time frame: For each 12-hour shift

Secondary outcomes

  1. mortality

    used to test validity of the prediction algorithm for estimating nurse staffing requirements

    Time frame: within 30 days of patient admission

  2. length of stay

    used to test validity of the prediction algorithm for estimating nurse staffing requirements

    Time frame: from hospital admission until discharge

  3. readmission

    to test validity of the prediction algorithm for estimating nurse staffing requirements

    Time frame: within 30 days of hospital admission

  4. healthcare-associated conditions

    infections that patients get while receiving healthcare. Used to test validity of the prediction algorithm for estimating nurse staffing requirements

    Time frame: from hospital admission until discharge

  5. were the nursing staff on duty appropriate to meet patient care needs

    as assessed by the nurse in charge of the ward. Used to assess validity of the prediction of nurse staffing requirements.

    Time frame: for each 8- or 12-hour shift

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Southampton
    Southampton, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 27, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06923943
Lead sponsor
University of Southampton
Collaborators
Imperial College London, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, NHS England, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
Responsible party
Christina Saville (Dr., University of Southampton) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 11, 2025
Start date
Nov 1, 2025
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 27, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion