ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06921174Updated Apr 10, 2025

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Classical Perineal Massage Therapy Versus the Use of an Intravaginal Device to Reduce Postpartum Perineal Pain

A Phase 2 interventional study of Use of the "Crescendo 2" Intravaginal Device and Classical Perineal Massage Therapy in Pelvic Pain, sponsored by Instituto Sexológico Murciano. Recruiting at 1 site in Spain. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-10.

Sponsored by Instituto Sexológico Murciano · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2025, 1 year 5 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Mar 2025; still recruiting 1 year 7 months later.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
140
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

GA34.01 postpartum, a randomized design with a parallel group structure will be applied, randomly assigning participants into two groups. The first group will receive the traditional perineal massage therapy, while the second group will use the intravaginal device "Crescendo 2." In this study, a pre- and post-intervention evaluation will be conducted, using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) as the primary outcome measure and the Clinical Global Impression Scale as the secondary outcome measure.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pelvic Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • postpartum pelvic pain
03

In context

Pelvic Pain

375 studies on the registry are indexed under Pelvic Pain; 89 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 140 is above the median of 60 across 277 interventional studies indexed under Pelvic Pain.

Browse Pelvic Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Instituto Sexológico Murciano is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women aged 18 years or older.
  • Residing in the Region of Murcia.
  • Having had a vaginal delivery between 6 weeks and 12 months prior to enrollment.
  • Presenting postpartum perineal pain, coded in ICD-11 as GA34.01.
  • Have not received any prior treatment for this condition.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of severe conditions such as:
  • Excessive postpartum hemorrhage
  • Serious infections
  • Respiratory or circulatory complications
  • Neurological disorders requiring intensive medical intervention
  • Currently under pharmacological treatment for pelvic pain.
  • Active vaginal infections.
  • Expressed refusal to participate or inability to comply with study procedures.
  • Women with episiotomy may participate only if there were no complications such as severe infection or hemorrhage following the procedure.

Willingness to participate and to follow the study protocol.

Exclusion Criteria:

-

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
140 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Classical Perineal Massage Therapy

    Performed manually by a pelvic floor physiotherapist. One 30-minute session per week for 12 weeks.

    Procedure: Classical Perineal Massage Therapy

  • Experimental
    Use of the "Crescendo 2" Intravaginal Device

    Self-administered perineal massage at home. Three times per week, 10 minutes each session, over a 12-week period.

    Device: Use of the "Crescendo 2" Intravaginal Device

Interventions

  • DeviceUse of the "Crescendo 2" Intravaginal Device

    Self-administered perineal massage at home with Crescendo device. Three times per week, 10 minutes each session, over a 12-week period.

  • ProcedureClassical Perineal Massage Therapy

    Performed manually by a pelvic floor physiotherapist. One 30-minute session per week for 12 weeks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) - to assess pain intensity

    The \*\*Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)\*\* will be used as the \*\*primary outcome measure\*\*. It consists of a horizontal line approximately 10 centimeters long. At each end of the line are the extreme expressions of pain: on the left, "no pain," and on the right, "worst imaginable pain." This tool allows us to measure the intensity of pain with high reproducibility between observers. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS): The Visual Analogue Scale is a psychometric response scale used to measure pain intensity. It typically consists of a 10-centimeter horizontal line anchored by two verbal descriptors: "no pain" (score = 0) and "worst imaginable pain" (score = 10). Minimum score: 0 (no pain) Maximum score: 10 (worst imaginable pain) Interpretation: Higher scores indicate worse outcomes (i.e., more intense pain).

    Time frame: First measure week 1 and Last measure week 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Clinical Global Impression (CGI) - for overall health status

    The Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) will be used as the secondary outcome measure. The Global Impression Scale (GIC) is a subjective tool used to assess the overall perceived change in a patient's health status, particularly in clinical studies involving various conditions and treatments. Clinical Global Impression - Change (CGI-C) Scale: The Clinical Global Impression - Change scale is a clinician-rated tool used to assess changes in a patient's condition over time, relative to baseline. Minimum score: 1 (very much improved) Maximum score: 7 (very much worse) Interpretation: Lower scores indicate better outcomes (i.e., greater clinical improvement), while higher scores indicate worsening.

    Time frame: At the end of the treatment week 12

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Instituto Sexológico Murciano
    Murcia, Murcia 30007, Spain
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Schulz KF, Grimes DA. Generation of allocation sequences in randomised trials: chance, not choice. Lancet. 2002 Feb 9;359(9305):515-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07683-3. PubMed 11853818 ↗
  • Beckmann MM, Garrett AJ. Antenatal perineal massage for reducing perineal trauma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jan 25;(1):CD005123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005123.pub2. PubMed 16437520 ↗

Related links

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Mar 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2025, 2 months after the start.

Of 14 phase 2 interventional studies under Pelvic Pain, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 20 and three quarters within 29. This study's planned 2 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 27, 2025
First posted
Apr 10, 2025
StartActual
Mar 27, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Jun 1, 2025
CompletionEst.
Aug 31, 2025
Last update
Apr 10, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 10, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06921174
Lead sponsor
Instituto Sexológico Murciano
Collaborators
CIAGO - Center for Comprehensive Gynecology and Obstetrics, Carmen Parra Pilates Center
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 10, 2025
Start date
Mar 27, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 31, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 10, 2025

Study contacts

Jesús Eugenio Dr. Rodríguez Martínez, Phd
Contact
jesuseugenio@isemu.es
+34639238413

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion