An interventional study of Wireless respiratory rate monitor in Respiratory Rate Accuracy Test, Capnography and Wireless Vital Signs Monitoring System, sponsored by Eupnea AS. Completed at 1 site in Norway. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-13.
Sponsored by Eupnea AS · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention
Comparing a wireless accelerometer-based sensor that continuously measure breathing rate with the gold standard capnography. The aim is to evaluate if both methods are equivalent.
This is the only study on the registry with Eupnea AS as lead sponsor.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients are being monitored for one hour with a wireless, accelerometer based respiratory rate sensor and a capnograph.
Device: Wireless respiratory rate monitor
This sensor is being fasten on the chest of the patients and measures respiratory rate with the help of an accelerometer. Data is being sent wireless to a backend monitor.
Validation of correctness of the sensor
The respiratory rate measured by the sensor is being compared to the respiratory rate by capnography. A discrepancy of +- 3 breaths/min is within the acceptable range.
Time frame: one hour
Plan to share: Undecided
This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.