ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT06910033CMF SafeTi FitUpdated Oct 13, 2026

Long-term Safety and Performance of CMF Porous Titanium Implants

An observational study in Craniofacial Defects, sponsored by Materialise. Enrolling by invitation at 2 sites in 2 countries. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-13.

Sponsored by Materialise · Observational

Updated Oct 13, 2026Now Enrolling by invitationGo to Updates ↓

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
200
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this retrospective study is to evaluate the clinical characteristics, efficiency, safety, and long-term performance of craniomaxillofacial (CMF) Porous Titanium Implants within the standard of care across children (0 - \<12 years old), adolescent (12 - \<22 years old), and adult (≥ 22 years old) populations.

Read the detailed description

The loss of bone substance or continuity in the cranial and/or facial region can result from trauma, infection, benign or malign tumor resection, and therapeutic side effects (e.g., radiotherapy). CMF Porous Titanium Implants are patient-specific solutions matched with the patient's anatomy to reconstruct bone defects accurately. Following a premarket clinical evaluation and considering long-term risk management, the decision to conduct a retrospective post-market clinical follow-up study was based on identifying possible residual risks and uncertainty about long-term safety and clinical performance that may impact the benefit/risk ratio of the CMF porous titanium devices, thereby ensuring the continued safety and efficacy of these CMF devices.

02

Conditions studied

  • Craniofacial Defects

Keywords

  • Craniofacial Defects
  • Implants
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Materialise is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Retrospective collection of a minimum of 200 patients that were treated between 2016 and 2023 with patient-specific CMF Porous Titanium Implants for facial and/or cranial reconstruction or restoration of bone defects. All patients included in the study underwent standard visits and follow-up assessments in-hospital.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age: Patients of any age are eligible for this study.
  • Patients treated with Materialise patient-specific CMF Porous Titanium Implants for facial and/or cranial reconstruction.
  • Patients who have followed Standard of Care, as determined in each case by the treating surgeon.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known to Titanium at the time of surgery.
  • Patients who had or will receive the TMJ Total Arthroplasty System.
  • Pregnancy at the time of surgery.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • DeviceCraniomaxillofacial (CMF) porous titanium implant

    All patients were treated, between 2016 and 2023, with patient-specific CMF Porous Titanium Implants for facial and/or cranial reconstruction or restoration of bone defects.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Last visit success rate of the device after the surgical implantation of Materialise patient-specific CMF Porous Titanium Implants

    Success is defined as follows: \- The device is securely in place and functional as of the last follow-up or until its removal for reasons unrelated to the device itself. Failure is defined as follows: * Reoperation without device removal related to the device. * Reoperation with device removal related to the device.

    Time frame: Last visit (up to 8 years post-implantation)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Perioperative complications related and unrelated to CMF Porous Titanium Implants

    Complications related and unrelated to CMF Porous Titanium Implants, including allergic reaction to the anesthetic or titanium (anaphylaxis), complications related to the anesthesia, hematoma, or others.

    Time frame: Up to the moment the patient is discharged from the hospital after the procedure (discharge), up to several weeks, depending on defect severity and recovery progress

  2. General post-operative complications up to standard of care (SOC) follow-up

    Complications related and unrelated to CMF Porous Titanium Implants, including infection, pain, implant migration, implant exposure, failure of implant, device subsidence, device fracture, diplopia, hematoma, dysesthesia, osteolysis, fistula, wound dehiscence, delayed healing, or others.

    Time frame: 4 weeks, 3 months, 1 year, 2-3 years, up to 8 years follow-up

  3. Re-intervention rate, implant-related or not

    Time frame: Up to 8 years follow-up

  4. Intraoperative blood loss (mL)

    Estimated blood loss by visual inspection or gravimetric method

    Time frame: At procedure

  5. Technical success of the implantation

    Defined by the surgeon, including but not limited to the implantation of the CMF Porous Titanium Implant and guides (if applicable) according to the pre-operative plan without technical difficulties, including design issues, placement issues, planning issues, guides, or others.

    Time frame: At procedure

  6. Accuracy of the device implantation compared to the pre-operative plan

    Accuracy will be quantified by superpositioning the post-operative images with the planning.

    Time frame: 4 weeks follow-up

  7. Implant migration

    Migration will be quantified by calculating the difference between the immediate post-operative and 3-month and 1-year post-operative scans.

    Time frame: 3 months, 1 year follow-up

  8. Implant time of the device

    Time frame: From surgery up to 8 years

  9. Surgical operation time

    Time frame: At procedure

  10. Total hospital post-operative stay

    Time of discharge will be registered in eCRF. Post-operative treatment carried out according to the standard practice of the investigational sites will be registered in the eCRF.

    Time frame: Up to the moment the patient is discharged from the hospital after the procedure (discharge), up to several weeks, depending on defect severity and recovery progress

07

Study locations

2 sites
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Nov 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Nov 2026, 12 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 31, 2024
First posted
Apr 4, 2025
StartActual
Nov 17, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Nov 2026
CompletionEst.
Nov 2026
Last update
Oct 13, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Status
Not yet recruiting→Enrolling by invitation
changed Oct 13, 2026
Contact
No study contact listed any more: removed d•••@archerresearch.eu · •••6948
Oct 13, 2026
Site contacts
Changed at 2 sites. See the sites
Show 2 sites
  • Rigshospitalet · Copenhagen, DenmarkContact removed t•••@regionh.dk · •••2002
  • Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière · Paris, FranceContact removed o•••@aphp.fr · •••8291
Oct 13, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 13, 2026
    Not yet recruiting→Enrolling by invitation
    Contact No study contact listed any more: removed d•••@archerresearch.eu · •••6948
    Site contacts Changed at 2 sites. See the sites
    Show 2 sites
    • Rigshospitalet · Copenhagen, DenmarkContact removed t•••@regionh.dk · •••2002
    • Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière · Paris, FranceContact removed o•••@aphp.fr · •••8291
    + 3 other changes: verification date, date precision and oversight details

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06910033
Lead sponsor
Materialise
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 4, 2025
Start date
Nov 17, 2025
Primary completion
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 13, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion