CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06900413Updated Sep 18, 2026

ESP vs. EXORA Blocks for Analgesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

An interventional study of Group ESP and Group EXORA in Erector Spinae Plane Block, Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Plane Block, sponsored by Aycan KURTARANGİL DOĞAN. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-18.

Sponsored by Aycan KURTARANGİL DOĞAN · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
56
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy may experience moderate to severe postoperative pain. Effective postoperative analgesia enhances patient comfort and accelerates recovery. This study aims to compare the effects of Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) and External Oblique and Rectus Abdominis Plane (EXORA) blocks on postoperative pain management and analgesic consumption.

The study is designed as a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial. Patients will be randomly assigned to groups, and both practitioners and evaluators will be blinded to group assignments. Our hypothesis is that the EXORA block will provide superior analgesia and require less analgesic consumption compared to the ESP block. The results will be assessed in terms of postoperative pain management, patient comfort, and additional analgesic requirements.

02

Conditions studied

  • Erector Spinae Plane Block
  • Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
  • Plane Block

Keywords

  • Erector Spinae Plane Block
  • exora block
  • laparoscopic cholecystectomy
  • patient-controlled analgesia
  • plane block
03

In context

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Aycan KURTARANGİL DOĞAN as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Age between 18 and 65 years

Undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I to III

Providing written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Known allergy or hypersensitivity to local anesthetics

Infection or skin lesions at the site of block application

Emergency surgical procedures

Refusal to participate in the study

Uncontrolled arterial hypertension

Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus

Mental retardation

Current use of antidepressant medications

Presence of metabolic disorders

Known bleeding diathesis

Morbid obesity (Body Mass Index > 40 kg/m²)

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
56 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group ESP

    The ESP block will be performed approximately 30 minutes before general anesthesia induction following sedation and standard monitoring. All block procedures will be conducted under sterile conditions, with skin preparation using dermol (%70 Isopropyl Alcohol, %2 Chlorhexidine Gluconate) and the ultrasound probe covered with a sterile drape.

    Procedure: Group ESP

  • Active comparator
    Group EXORA

    The EXORA block will be performed 30 minutes before general anesthesia induction, following sedation and standard monitoring.

    Procedure: Group EXORA

Interventions

  • ProcedureGroup ESP

    Experienced anesthesiologists with at least five years of expertise in regional anesthesia will perform the blocks under ultrasound guidance. A 4.0-12.0 MHz linear ultrasound probe (Affiniti 50; Philips) will be used. The ESP block will be applied at the T8 level on the right side, using an in-plane approach, while the patient is in a sitting position. The probe will be placed 2-3 cm lateral to the vertebra in a sagittal position to visualize the erector spinae muscle and transverse processes. A 22G, 100 mm block needle (Stimuplex® Ultra, Braun, Germany) will be advanced in a craniocaudal direction. The correct needle position will be confirmed by injecting 0.5-1 mL of isotonic NaCl and observing the spread via hydrodissection. Finally, 0.3 mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine will be administered, ensuring cranial and caudal spread of the local anesthetic.

  • ProcedureGroup EXORA

    Experienced anesthesiologists with at least five years of expertise in regional anesthesia will administer the blocks under ultrasound guidance. A 4.0-12.0 MHz linear ultrasound probe will be placed laterally to the xiphoid process on the parasternal line in a sagittal position. The probe will be moved craniocaudally to identify the 6th rib and further advanced caudally to locate the 8th rib. Once the rectus abdominis muscle and 8th costal cartilage are identified, a 22G, 100 mm block needle will be used to administer 0.3 mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine. The correct spread of the local anesthetic will be confirmed via ultrasound.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Tramadol consumption

    Total tramadol used in the first 12 and 24 hours postoperatively.

    Time frame: 12 and 24 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain Assessment

    Postoperative pain will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), which ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Higher scores indicate a worse outcome (more pain). Units on a scale (0-10)

    Time frame: 30 minutes, 2 hours, 4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours after surgery

  2. Pinprick Sensory Block Test Results

    Sensory block efficacy will be evaluated using the pinprick test at specified time intervals. The presence or absence of sensory block will be recorded. Binary (Block present / Block absent)

    Time frame: 10 minutes, 20 minutes, and 30 minutes after the block, and 30 minutes after surgery

  3. Nausea and Vomiting Score (NVS)

    Postoperative nausea and vomiting will be evaluated using the Nausea and Vomiting Scale (NVS), which includes: 1. = No nausea, 2. = Mild nausea, 3. = Severe nausea, 4. = Vomiting present. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome. Units on a scale (1-4)

    Time frame: Within 24 hours after surgery

  4. Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS)

    Postoperative sedation will be assessed using the Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS), which includes: 1. = Anxious, agitated, or restless 2. = Cooperative, oriented, and tranquil 3. = Responds to commands only 4. = Brisk response to auditory stimulus 5. = Sluggish response to auditory stimulus 6. = No response Higher scores indicate a deeper level of sedation. Units on a scale (1-6)

    Time frame: Within 24 hours after surgery

  5. Additional Analgesic Consumption

    The total amount of additional analgesics administered postoperatively will be recorded. Milligrams (mg)

    Time frame: Within 24 hours after surgery

Other outcomes

  1. Total Antiemetic Consumption

    The total amount of antiemetic medication administered within 24 hours postoperatively will be recorded. Milligrams (mg)

    Time frame: Within 24 hours after surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Kütahya City Hospital
    Kütahya, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 18, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06900413
Lead sponsor
Aycan KURTARANGİL DOĞAN
Collaborators
Kutahya City Hospital
Responsible party
Aycan KURTARANGİL DOĞAN (Principal Investigator, Kutahya City Hospital) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Mar 28, 2025
Start date
Oct 1, 2025
Primary completion
Apr 15, 2026
Completion
Apr 15, 2026
Last update
Sep 18, 2026

Study contacts

Aycan KURTARANGİL DOĞAN
principal investigator · Kütahya City Hospital
Ali Kaynak
principal investigator · Kütahya City Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion