ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06897215GOMSUpdated Apr 9, 2025

A Sequential Cohort Study Exploring GELCLAIR in the Management of Oral Mucositis in Patients Receiving Radical Radiation for Head and Neck Cancer

An interventional study of Hyaluronic acid hydrogel in Oral Mucositis Due to Radiation, sponsored by Nova Scotia Health Authority. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-09.

Sponsored by Nova Scotia Health Authority · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Nov 2025, 11 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
48
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if Gelclair lubricant gel can help manage Oral Mucositis (OM) among Oropharyngeal and Oral cavity cancer patients receiving radiation treatment. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. Does Gelclair help to manage the symptoms of OM and decrease its severity?
  2. What do participants report as the maximum levels of pain and difficulties with swallowing?

Researchers will compare Gelclair to the standard of care mouthwash treatment for OM (currently used for all patients with symptomatic OM) to see if Gelclair is helpful in managing oral mucositis.

For the cohort using Gelclair, participants will:

  1. Take the prescribed treatment for OM (Gelclair or Oncology mouthwash) once it is diagnosed, up to and including 4 weeks after radiation completes.
  2. Complete a weekly survey about their OM symptoms up to and including 4 weeks after radiation completes.
  1. Report any problems experienced with prescribed treatment for OM (Gelclair or mouthwash).

The same data will be collected for the cohort using standard of care mouthwash for comparison.

Read the detailed description

Radiotherapy (RT) induced mucositis, including oral mucositis (OM), is the most common high-grade toxicity observed during high dose RT for Head and Neck Cancer (HNC). Prevention usually consists of adhering to oral care protocols, avoiding irritants, and avoiding mucosal hot spots in the RT plan. Once it occurs, analgesic treatments include various mixtures of pain relief mouthwashes, NSAIDS, opioids, and steroids and antifungals as indicated.

Mucoadhesive topical coating agents have been used to treat RT induced OM.

Study eligible patients will be offered participation after clinic consultation has taken place. They will be detailed provided study information and if they consent in writing, will be assigned to the standard of care cohort (16 patients) and the experimental cohort (32 patients) in a sequential format.

The first cohort of 16 patients will be evaluated for oral mucositis (OM) using CTCAE V5 criteria and Patient Reported Outcome questionnaires while undergoing management with current standard of care for symptomatic OM which includes lidocaine-based mouthwashes as initial treatment. The subsequent (experimental) cohort of 32 patients will begin treatment with Gelclair once symptomatic OM develops with the same evaluation parameters as the previous (control) cohort. Gelclair is a hyaluronic acid hydrogel that acts as a protective film in the management of OM. This product is used internationally and has been recently approved by Health Canada as a Class 2 Medical Device with an indication to manage the symptoms of OM caused by radiotherapy and chemotherapy.

After collection of baseline data (including age, sex, cancer diagnosis and staging, relevant past medical history, treatment plan, weight, nutrional status), weekly data (includes OM grading, Patient Reported Outcome for OM, weight, analgesic requirements, parenteral nutrional requirements, side effects, adherence to protocol) during radiation therapy (RT) and for 4 weeks after RT completion is recorded.

Upon study completion, analysis will be aimed at the following outcomes:

Primary Objective: Explore the effectiveness of GelClair versus SOC mouth wash in the management of symptomatic radiation-induced OM.

Secondary Objectives: Patient reported outcomes (PRO) for maximum levels reached of odynophagia and dysphagia (assessed weekly from RT start until 4 weeks after completion)

Other measurement outcomes include time to initiation of opioid (or increase in baseline dose) measured in days, weight loss, treatment delays / modifications due to OM, requirement for feeding tube, adherence to treatment protocol, cost analysis for SOC mouthwash versus GelClair based on total days use of each agent.

02

Conditions studied

  • Oral Mucositis Due to Radiation

Keywords

  • Oral Mucositis
  • Radiation toxicity
  • Gelclair
  • hyaluronic acid hydrogel
03

In context

Stomatitis

306 studies on the registry are indexed under Stomatitis; 75 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 48 is below the median of 60 across 276 interventional studies indexed under Stomatitis.

Browse Stomatitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Nova Scotia Health Authority is the lead sponsor of 264 studies on the registry; 78 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosed with primary mucosal squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx or oral cavity
  • Treatment plan includes at least 60Gy of daily radiotherapy, with or without concurrent chemotherapy
  • Highly likely to develop OM v5.0, grade 2
  • Can read and understand English

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who already have parenteral feeding tubes prescribed
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

CTCAE grade

The US National Cancer Institute’s scale of how severe an adverse event is — any unwanted medical event during a study, such as a symptom, an illness or an abnormal test result, whether or not a treatment caused it. Whether it did is judged separately.

1
Mild.
2
Moderate.
3
Severe.
4
Life-threatening.
5
Death due to the event.

“Side effects of earlier treatment resolved to grade 1 or less” means they have settled to mild or gone.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
48 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Cohort 1

    The first cohort of patients (16) will be evaluated for oral mucositis (OM) development and management while undergoing current standard of care which includes lidocaine-based mouthwashes as initial treatment and weekly assessments during 6-7 weeks of radiation treatment up to and including 4 weeks post-radiation treatment.

  • Experimental
    Experimental Cohort

    The subsequent (experimental) cohort of patients (32) will begin treatment with Gelclair once significant OM develops with the same evaluation parameters as the previous (control) cohort. Gelclair be used at the onset of Grade 2 OM topically to be swished in the oral cavity and then spit 3 times a daily during treatment and until OM symptoms resolve which is usually at least 4 weeks after completion of RT.

    Device: Hyaluronic acid hydrogel

Interventions

  • DeviceHyaluronic acid hydrogel

    Assigned to the Experimental Cohort once OM grade 2.0 presents, Gelclair is a hyaluronic acid hydrogel that acts as a protective film in the management of OM. This product is used internationally and has been recently approved by Health Canada as a Class 2 Medical Device with an indication to manage the symptoms of OM caused by radiotherapy and chemotherapy.

    Also known as: Gelclair

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Assess the effectiveness of GelClair versus SOC mouth wash in the management of symptomatic OM.

    The reduction of maximum Grade 2 (CTCAE V5.0) oral mucositis will be compared between the two cohorts.

    Time frame: From enrollment up to and including 4 weeks after treatment completion.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to Initiation of Opioid or Increase in baseline dose

    Quantitative comparison between cohorts calculating (in days) the need to increase or change participant's management of OM.

    Time frame: From enrollment up to and including 4 weeks after radiation treatment completes.

  2. Changes in Weight

    Quantitative comparison between cohorts calculating change in weight weight (in kgs) in participants.

    Time frame: From enrollment up to and including 4 weeks after radiation treatment completes.

  3. Significant treatment delays/modifications

    Measured as a yes/no flag comparing totals across the cohorts

    Time frame: From enrollment up to and including 4 weeks after radiation treatment completes.

  4. Requirement for feeding tube

    Quantitative comparison between cohorts of total number of patients requiring a new feeding tube during the course of radiation treatment.

    Time frame: From enrollment up to and including 4 weeks after radiation treatment completes.

  5. Rate of adherence to treatment protocol using Patient Reported Outcomes

    Quantitative comparison between cohorts for compliance with prescribed treatment of OM measured weekly.

    Time frame: From enrollment up to and including 4 weeks after radiation treatment completes.

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — This is a single center study and IPD will not be shared with anyone outside the study personnel at this center.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for May 2025; primary completion for Nov 2025, 6 months later.

Of 65 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Stomatitis, half reached primary completion within 14 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 57. This study's planned 6 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 73 studies reached it within 14 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 32.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 20, 2025
First posted
Mar 26, 2025
StartEst.
May 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Nov 30, 2025
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2025
Last update
Apr 9, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 9, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06897215
Responsible party
Murali Rajaraman (Radiation Oncologist, Nova Scotia Health Authority) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 26, 2025
Start date
May 1, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 9, 2025

Study contacts

Murali Rajaraman
Contact
murali.rajaraman@nshealth.ca
902-473-6405
Susan Chisholm
Contact
Sue.chisholm@nshealth.ca
902-266-4919
Murali Rajaraman
principal investigator · Nova Scotia Health
Derek Wilke
principal investigator · Nova Scotia Health

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion