ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06896253CORIUMUpdated Mar 26, 2025

Pulse Corticosteroids Or/and Immunoglobulins to Treat Fulminant Myocarditis

A Phase 2 interventional study of Pulse bolus corticosteroids and Pulse bolus corticosteroids and IVIG in Myocarditis Acute, sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 15 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-26.

Sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
15 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Fulminant myocarditis (FM) is the most severe manifestation of acute myocarditis, an acute inflammatory myocardial disease most often triggered by viral infections.

Currently, the most accepted definition of FM requires acute illness, hemodynamic compromise due to cardiogenic shock, and need for hemodynamic support (inotropes and/or temporary mechanical circulatory support (t-MCS) in the absence of an ischemic cause or other pre-existing cardiomyopathies. Unfortunately, there is a paucity of evidence-based management strategies for this disease and the management of patients affected by FM often varies according to local experience and practice with the role of immunosuppression being the most debated issue.

Besides, due to inconsistent results obtained in several studies and frequent spontaneous recovery with supportive therapy alone, immunosuppression is largely debated in the setting of lymphocytic myocarditis (LM). Among available medications for this disease, corticosteroids are often used despite a lack of clear evidence in the context of FM. Similarly, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) has both antiviral and anti-inflammatory effects on myocarditis. In adults, a recent meta-analysis based on case series showed that IVIG therapy significantly reduced in-hospital mortality, improved the left ventricular ejection fraction, and significantly increased the survival rate in patients with FM. More recently, FM among patients with COVID-19, including post-infectious multisystem inflammatory syndrome, has been reported in young adult patients. These severe forms have been successfully treated with intravenous corticosteroids and IVIG, highlighting the relevance of the systemic inflammatory response in determining cardiac injury in COVID-19, even though more evidence is needed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Myocarditis Acute

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Fulminant myocarditis
03

In context

Myocarditis

174 studies on the registry are indexed under Myocarditis; 75 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 120 is above the median of 80 across 53 interventional studies indexed under Myocarditis.

Browse Myocarditis studies →

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris is the lead sponsor of 3,592 studies on the registry; 1,033 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
15 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

    1. Fulminant myocarditis defined by

      • the acute illness (\<1 month from symptom onset),
      • hemodynamic compromise due to cardiogenic shock (confirmed by echocardiography) or electrical storm,
      • elevated plasma cardiac troponin > twice normal value
      • need for hemodynamic support (inotropes or temporary mechanical circulatory support) for less than 72 hours in the absence of an ischemic cause or other pre-existing cardiomyopathies Noticeably, a coronary angiogram should be performed in patients ≥40 years of age when myocarditis has not been proven histologically. Besides, an endomyocardial will not be mandatory to fulfill the definition of fulminant myocarditis.

        1. Signed from the patient, a close relative or surrogate or a family member or a legal representative for minor patient.
      • Adult : According to the specifications of emergency inclusion, randomization without the close relative/surrogate consent could be performed if the patientis unable to give his/her consent and when the close relative/surrogate/family member are absent. Close relative/surrogate/family member consent will be asked as soon as possible after randomization. The patient will be asked as soon as possible to give his/her consent for the continuation of the trial when his/her condition will allow.
      • Minor : According to the specifications of emergency inclusion, randomization could be performed when legal representative are absent. Legal representative consent will be asked as soon as possible after randomization 3. Social security registration (AME excluded)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

    1. Age \<15 2. Pregnancy or breastfeeding or baby delivery \<6 months 3. Initiation of inotropes or temporary mechanical circulatory support >72 hours 4. Resuscitation >20 minutes (cumulative low-flow time > 20 minutes ) 5. Pre-existing ischemic or dilated cardiomyopathy or Tako-Tsubo evaluated by echocardiography.

      1. Known systemic disorder or other conditions requiring 7. Patients with peripheral eosinophilia (≥1000 G/L) 8. Myocarditis associated with anti-cancer agents 9. Active severe bacterial or fungal infectious disease 10. Patient moribund on the day of randomization, SAPS II >90 11. or allergies to or immunoglobulins or any components of the formulations or their 12. Patients already on corticosteroids or receiving IVIG 13. Participation in another interventional study or being in the exclusion period at the end of a previous study.
      1. Patients with an uncontrolled psychotic condition Patients with known anti-IgA antibodies in line with the contraindications of methylprednisolone IV and of IVIg based products respectively
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(8)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

PD-1, PD-L1 and checkpoint inhibitors

PD-1, PD-L1 and CTLA-4 are proteins that act as brakes on the immune system. Checkpoint inhibitors, such as pembrolizumab or nivolumab, block them so the immune system can attack a cancer.

PD-L1 can also be measured in a tumour sample. Some scores count stained tumour cells only (TPS); others also count certain immune cells (CPS). The study names the score and the minimum it uses.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Pulse bolus corticosteroids group

    1. 1 gram/day of methylprednisolone IV for three days followed by 1mg/kg/day IV until inotropes weaning or 7 days whatever come first. 2. Placebo of IVIG: glucose 5% 0.5g/kg/day for 4 days

    Drug: Pulse bolus corticosteroids

  • Experimental
    Pulse bolus corticosteroids and IVIG group

    1. 1 gram/day of methylprednisolone IV for three days followed by 1mg/kg/day IV until inotropes weaning or 7 days whatever come first. 2. 0.5g/kg/day IVIG for 4 days.

    Drug: Pulse bolus corticosteroids and IVIG

  • Placebo comparator
    Double placebo pulse bolus corticosteroids (G5%) and IVIG (G5 %)

    Drug: Pulse bolus corticosteroids (G5%) and IVIG (G5 %)

Interventions

  • DrugPulse bolus corticosteroids

    Treatment administration

  • DrugPulse bolus corticosteroids and IVIG

    Treatment administration

  • DrugPulse bolus corticosteroids (G5%) and IVIG (G5 %)

    Treatment administration

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. A composite hierarchical outcome composed of four components : 1) mortality at D28 2) heart transplant/VAD/persisting t-MCS at D28, and 3) number of days alive without t-MCS and inotropes at D28

    Each patient will be compared with every other patient in the study and assigned a score (tie: 0, win: +1, loss: -1) for each pairwise comparison based on whom fared better. If one patient survived without heart transplantation or long-term assist ventricular device or t-MCS still ongoing at day 28 and the other does not, scores of +1 and -1 will be assigned, respectively. Otherwise, the assigned score will depend on which patient had more days free from t-MCS and inotropes: the patient with more days off t-MCS and inotropes will receive a score of +1, and the other patient -1. If both patients survived and had the same number of days off t-MCS and inotropes, or if both patients died or had a heart transplant or a VAD, they will be both assigned a score of 0 for that pairwise comparison. For each patient, scores for all pairwise comparisons will be summed, resulting in a cumulative score which will be the primary endpoint of the study.

    Time frame: Day 28

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mortality

    Time frame: Day 28, Day 60, Day 90

  2. Number of temporary mechanical circulatory support free days

    Time frame: Day 28

  3. Number of inotropes-free days

    Time frame: Day 28

  4. Incidence of ventricular assisted device use

    Time frame: Day 28, Day 60, Day 90

  5. Incidence of heart transplant

    Time frame: Day 28, Day 60, Day 90

  6. Left ventricular function (%) assessed by echocardiography (Simpson method)

    Time frame: Day 3, Day 7, Day 14, Day 28

  7. Time to normalize troponin

    Time frame: From randomization to Day 14

  8. Time to normalize N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide

    Time frame: From randomization to Day 14

  9. Incidence of drugs side effects

    nosocomial infections, significant gastrointestinal bleeding, renal insufficiency, acute delirium leading to the use of neuroleptic agents

    Time frame: From randomization to Day 28

  10. Proportion of patients with left ventricular ejection fraction < 55%

    Time frame: Day 28, 6 months

  11. Proportion of patients with left ventricular dilatation

    Time frame: Day 28, 6 months

  12. Proportion of patients with late gadolinium enhancement evaluated by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

    Time frame: 6 months

  13. Incidence of hyperglycemia

    Time frame: From randomization to Day 14

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The procedures carried out with the French data privacy authority (CNIL, Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés) do not provide for the transmission of the database, nor do the information and consent documents signed by the patients. Consultation by the editorial board or interested researchers of individual participant data that underlie the results reported in the article after deidentification may nevertheless be considered, subject to prior determination of the terms and conditions of such consultation and in respect for compliance with the applicable regulations.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form

Time frame: Beginning 3 months and ending 3 years following article publication. Requests out of these time frame can also be submitted to the sponsor

Access criteria: Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 26, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06896253
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 26, 2025
Start date
Apr 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
May 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 26, 2025

Study contacts

Matthieu SCHMIDT, MD
Contact
matthieu.schmidt@aphp.fr
33142162937
Alain COMBES, MD
study director · Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion