CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06886802DEC-SCMUpdated Mar 4, 2026

Multicentric Case Series of Uniportal Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Decompression for Cervical Spinal Stenosis

An observational study in Spinal Stenosis Cervical, sponsored by TecSalud Investigación Clínica. Recruiting at 1 site in Mexico. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 74 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-04.

Sponsored by TecSalud Investigación Clínica · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2026; still recruiting 7 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50
Ages
18 Years to 74 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Cervical spinal stenosis is a condition that can cause pain, sensory disturbances, and motor deficits due to the compression of neural structures in the cervical spine. While conservative treatments such as physical therapy and pain management can help some patients, others with persistent neurological deficits may require surgical intervention. Traditional surgical approaches, including anterior decompression and posterior open surgery, have proven effective but carry risks such as vascular or nerve injuries and postoperative pain.

This study evaluates a minimally invasive surgical approach called Posterior Uniportal Endoscopic Cervical Decompression as an alternative to traditional methods for patients with cervical spinal stenosis. The main objective is to assess changes in neurological deficits and disability related to cervical pain following this procedure. The study will also document hospitalization duration, surgical time, blood loss, and the incidence of postoperative complications.

This multicenter, prospective case series will recruit 50 patients from three medical centers in Mexico. Participants must have symptomatic cervical spinal stenosis that persists despite at least three months of conservative treatment. Eligible patients will undergo Posterior Uniportal Endoscopic Cervical Decompression, a technique that allows precise nerve decompression through a small incision, minimizing damage to surrounding tissues. Standardized clinical assessment tools, including the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) scale, Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, will be used to evaluate outcomes at multiple time points over 12 months.

By comparing patients' preoperative and postoperative evaluations, the study aims to determine whether Posterior Uniportal Endoscopic Cervical Decompression effectively improves neurological function and reduces disability while maintaining a favorable safety profile. Findings from this study could support the adoption of minimally invasive endoscopic techniques as a viable option for treating cervical spinal stenosis, potentially leading to faster recovery times and reduced surgical complications compared to traditional methods.

Read the detailed description

Cervical spinal stenosis is a condition characterized by the narrowing of the cervical spinal canal, leading to compression of the neural structures. This can cause chronic pain, sensory disturbances, and motor deficits, significantly impairing the quality of life. While conservative management, including physical therapy, analgesics, and steroid injections, can provide symptomatic relief for some patients, others with persistent neurological deficits may require surgical intervention. Traditional surgical techniques, such as anterior cervical decompression and fusion or posterior open decompression, have been effective but carry risks such as vascular injury, neurological complications, and postoperative pain.

This study investigates the use of Posterior Uniportal Endoscopic Cervical Decompression, a minimally invasive surgical approach that offers targeted decompression through a single small incision while minimizing tissue disruption. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate changes in neurological deficits and disability related to cervical pain following this procedure. Secondary objectives include assessing the duration of hospitalization, surgical time, blood loss, and the incidence of postoperative complications.

This multicenter, prospective case series will recruit 50 patients diagnosed with cervical spinal stenosis at three medical institutions in Mexico. The study will be conducted over a period of 24 months, with an initial 12-month patient recruitment phase, followed by postoperative follow-up assessments at predetermined time intervals up to one year.

Participants will undergo Posterior Uniportal Endoscopic Cervical Decompression, a technique designed to preserve spinal mobility while reducing compression on the nerve roots. The procedure will be performed under general anesthesia with continuous neurophysiological monitoring, including somatosensory evoked potentials, motor evoked potentials, and continuous electromyography. Using a working-channel endoscope, surgeons will perform foraminotomies or laminotomies to remove compressive elements such as osteophytes, hypertrophic ligaments, or herniated disc material. The technique is aimed at achieving decompression with minimal disruption to the surrounding soft tissues.

Patients must meet specific inclusion criteria, including an age range of 18 to 75 years, confirmed diagnosis of cervical spinal stenosis (Kang classification grade I-III), and the presence of neurological symptoms unresponsive to at least three months of conservative management. Exclusion criteria include prior cervical surgery at the affected level, active infections, systemic inflammatory diseases, vertebral instability, congenital spinal malformations, and contraindications for general anesthesia.

Patient outcomes will be systematically evaluated using validated clinical assessment tools, including:

  • Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) Scale - to assess neurological function.
  • Neck Disability Index (NDI) - to measure the impact of cervical pain on daily activities.
  • Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain - to quantify cervical and upper limb pain intensity.
  • EQ-5D-5L health-related quality of life questionnaire - to evaluate overall well-being.
  • Modified MacNab Criteria - to determine patient satisfaction with surgical outcomes.

Descriptive statistical methods will be used to analyze demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population. Changes in primary and secondary outcomes will be evaluated using paired t-tests for continuous variables and Chi-square tests for categorical variables. The impact of the procedure on neurological function and pain relief will be assessed through longitudinal comparisons between baseline and follow-up assessments at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. The incidence of complications will be categorized using the Clavien-Dindo classification, and the Comprehensive Complication Index will be used to quantify cumulative morbidity.

This study complies with the Declaration of Helsinki, the International Council for Harmonisation Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP) guidelines, and national regulatory requirements. All participants will provide written informed consent before enrollment, and patient confidentiality will be maintained through data pseudonymization. The study has been approved by the Ethics Committees of the participating institutions.

The expected impact of this study is to generate clinical evidence supporting Posterior Uniportal Endoscopic Cervical Decompression as a safe and effective alternative to traditional surgical approaches for cervical spinal stenosis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Spinal Stenosis Cervical

Keywords

  • Cervical Spinal Stenosis
  • ► Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
  • ► Endoscopic Spine Surgery
  • ► Spinal Degenerative Disease
03

In context

Lead sponsor

TecSalud Investigación Clínica is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 74 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

  • Patients with cervical spinal stenosis who continue to experience symptoms despite receiving complete conservative management for at least 3 months and who have chosen to undergo posterior uniportal endoscopic cervical decompression will be recruited consecutively. Recruitment will take place at the following healthcare centers:
  • Centro Médico Zambrano-Hellion, TecSalud (San Pedro Garza García, N.L.) and Clínica Cuauhtémoc y Famosa (Monterrey, N.L.) Patients will be recruited by Dr. Mario Benvenutti Regato, a neurosurgery specialist with over 7 years of experience performing endoscopic spine surgery.
  • Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI (Mexico City) Patients will be recruited by Dr. Félix Domínguez Cortinas, a neurosurgery specialist with over 10 years of experience performing endoscopic spine surgery.
  • Hospital Ángeles Tijuana (Tijuana, B.C.) Patients will be recruited by Dr. Alfonso García Chávez, a specialist in traumatology and orthopedics with over 10 years of experience perfor

Inclusion criteria

  • Provision of informed consent to participate in the study.
  • Patients with cervical canal stenosis grade I-III according to the Kang scale.
  • Radicular or myelopathic symptoms.
  • Having undergone complete conservative management, including physical therapy and analgesia, for at least 3 months.
  • Patients who have opted for posterior uniportal endoscopic cervical decompression for cervical canal stenosis.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to read or write.
  • Prior cervical surgeries at the levels to be treated.
  • Infectious symptoms or concomitant rheumatologic diseases.
  • Criteria of cervical vertebral instability.
  • Congenital spinal malformations.
  • Disc herniation at the same cervical level to be operated on.
  • Medullary hyperintensity on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the level(s) to be treated.
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Cervical Spinal Stenosis Cases

    Patients diagnosed with cervical spinal stenosis who exhibit persistent neurological deficits and pain despite receiving at least three months of conservative treatment. All participants have elected to undergo Posterior Uniportal Endoscopic Cervical Decompression. They are being prospectively followed to evaluate improvements in neurological function and reductions in pain-related disability, as well as to document perioperative outcomes including surgical time, blood loss, hospital stay, and complications.

    Procedure: Posterior Uniportal Endoscopic Cervical Decompression

Interventions

  • ProcedurePosterior Uniportal Endoscopic Cervical Decompression

    Posterior Uniportal Endoscopic Cervical Decompression

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Cervical Disability (Neck Disability Index)

    This measure assesses disability related to cervical pain using the Neck Disability Index (NDI), a validated instrument scored from 0 (no disability) to 100 (maximum disability). It quantifies the impact of cervical pain on daily activities and overall function. Changes in NDI scores over time will reflect the effectiveness of the surgical intervention in reducing pain-related disability.

    Time frame: Baseline; 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively.

  2. Change in Neurological Function (Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score)

    This measure evaluates neurological function using the Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) scale. The mJOA score, which ranges from 0 (severe neurological deficits) to 18 (normal neurological function), assesses motor function, sensory deficits, and gait. Improvements in the mJOA score following surgery will be used as an indicator of enhanced neurological status.

    Time frame: Baseline; 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Duration of Hospitalization

    This metric records the total number of days from patient admission until discharge following the surgical procedure. It serves as an indicator of the immediate postoperative recovery and overall efficiency of the surgical intervention.

    Time frame: Measured during the index hospitalization.

  2. Duration of Surgery

    This outcome measures the surgical time, defined as the period from the initial incision to the final closure of the surgical site. It reflects procedural efficiency and may indirectly indicate the technical ease or complexity of the procedure.

    Time frame: Recorded intraoperatively.

  3. Intraoperative Blood Loss

    This measure quantifies the volume of blood lost during the surgical procedure, as collected via standard suction devices and measured in milliliters. It is an important indicator of surgical safety and efficiency.

    Time frame: Assessed during the surgical procedure.

  4. Rate of Perioperative Complications

    This measure records the incidence and severity of complications occurring during the perioperative period. Complications will be categorized according to the Clavien-Dindo classification and summarized using the Comprehensive Complication Index, providing a quantitative assessment of overall surgical morbidity.

    Time frame: Assessed 7 days, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Hospital Zambrano Hellion, TecSalud
    San Pedro Garza García, Nuevo León 66278, Mexico
    • Mario Benvenutti Regato, MD · Contact · mbenreg@tec.mx · (+52) 81 8888 0675
    • Mario Benvenutti Regato, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ye ZY, Kong WJ, Xin ZJ, Fu Q, Ao J, Cao GR, Cai YQ, Liao WB. Clinical Observation of Posterior Percutaneous Full-Endoscopic Cervical Foraminotomy as a Treatment for Osseous Foraminal Stenosis. World Neurosurg. 2017 Oct;106:945-952. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.07.085. Epub 2017 Jul 21. PubMed 28739520 ↗
  • Lv J, Mei J, Feng X, Tian X, Sun L. Clinical efficacy and safety of posterior minimally invasive surgery in cervical spondylosis: a systematic review. J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Aug 13;17(1):389. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03274-3. PubMed 35964065 ↗
  • Metzger RL. Evidence-based diagnosis and treatment of cervical spine disorders. Nurse Pract. 2019 Aug;44(8):30-37. doi: 10.1097/01.NPR.0000574648.67659.09. PubMed 31268958 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 4, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06886802
Lead sponsor
TecSalud Investigación Clínica
Collaborators
Tecnologico de Monterrey, Centro Medico Nacional Siglo XXI IMSS, Hospital Ángeles Tijuana, Hospital Zambrano Hellion TecSalud, Mexico
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 20, 2025
Start date
Feb 18, 2026
Primary completion
Feb 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 4, 2026

Study contacts

► Mario Benvenutti Regato, MD
Contact
mbenreg@tec.mx
(+52) 81 8888 0675
Mario Benvenutti Regato, MD
principal investigator · TecSalud Investigación Clínica

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion