CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT06878404ICONIC-PsA 1Updated Sep 25, 2026

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of JNJ-77242113 (Icotrokinra) in Biologic-naïve Participants With Active Psoriatic Arthritis

A Phase 3 interventional study of Icotrokinra and Placebo in Arthritis, Psoriatic, sponsored by Janssen Research & Development, LLC. Active, not recruiting at 155 sites in 16 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-25.

Sponsored by Janssen Research & Development, LLC · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
552
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of icotrokinra compared to placebo in participants with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) by assessing the reduction in signs and symptoms of PsA.

02

Conditions studied

  • Arthritis, Psoriatic

Browse trials for

03

In context

Arthritis, Psoriatic

580 studies on the registry are indexed under Arthritis, Psoriatic; 133 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 552 is above the median of 135 across 323 interventional studies indexed under Arthritis, Psoriatic.

Browse Arthritis, Psoriatic studies →

Lead sponsor

Janssen Research & Development, LLC is the lead sponsor of 912 studies on the registry; 76 are open to participants now.

Of its 278 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 131 (47%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Have a diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) for at least 3 months before the first administration of study intervention and meet classification criteria for psoriatic arthritis (CASPAR) at screening
  • Have active PsA as defined by: (a) At least 3 swollen joints and at least 3 tender joints at screening and at baseline (b) C-reactive protein (CRP) greater than or equal to (>=) 0.1 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) at screening from the central laboratory
  • Have at least 1 of the PsA subsets: distal interphalangeal joint involvement, polyarticular arthritis with absence of rheumatoid nodules, arthritis mutilans, asymmetric peripheral arthritis, or spondylitis with peripheral arthritis
  • Have active plaque psoriasis with at least one psoriatic plaque of >= 2 cm diameter or nail changes consistent with psoriasis
  • A female participant of childbearing potential must have a negative highly sensitive serum pregnancy test (Beta-hCG) at screening and a negative urine pregnancy test at Week 0 prior to administration of study intervention

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has previously received any biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) for PsA or psoriasis
  • Has a history or current signs or symptoms of severe, progressive, or uncontrolled renal, hepatic, cardiac, vascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neurologic, hematologic, rheumatologic (with the exception of PsA), psychiatric, genitourinary, or metabolic disturbances
  • Has known allergies, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to icotrokinra or its excipients
  • Has other inflammatory diseases that might confound the evaluations of benefit of icotrokinra therapy, including but not limited to rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus, or lyme disease
  • Participants with fibromyalgia or osteoarthritis symptoms that, in the investigator's opinion, would have potential to interfere with efficacy assessments
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
552 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group I: Icotrokinra Dose 1

    Participants will receive icotrokinra dose 1. Participants who continue into a long term extension (LTE) will continue to receive icotrokinra dose 1.

    Drug: Icotrokinra

  • Experimental
    Group II: Icotrokinra Dose 2

    Participants will receive icotrokinra dose 2. Participants who continue into a LTE will continue to receive icotrokinra dose 2.

    Drug: Icotrokinra

  • Placebo comparator
    Group III: Placebo

    Participants will receive placebo matched to icotrokinra and will cross over to receive icotrokinra dose 1 or dose 2. Participants who continue into the LTE will continue to receive icotrokinra dose 1 or dose 2.

    Drug: Icotrokinra · Drug: Placebo

  • Active comparator
    Group IV: Active Reference Comparator

    Participants will receive active reference drug. Participants who continue into a LTE will cross-over to receive icotrokinra dose 1 or dose 2.

    Drug: Icotrokinra · Drug: Active reference comparator

Interventions

  • DrugIcotrokinra

    Icotrokinra will be administered.

    Also known as: JNJ-77242113

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo will be administered.

  • DrugActive reference comparator

    Active reference drug will be administered.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Participants who Achieve an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) ACR 20 Response at Week 16

    The ACR 20 responders are participants with an improvement of greater than or equal to (\>=) 20 percent (%) from baseline in both the tender and swollen joint count and in at least 3 of the 5 assessments (patient's assessment of pain visual analog scale (VAS), patient's global assessment of disease activity VAS scale, physician's global assessment of disease activity VAS scale, health assessment questionnaire and C-reactive protein).

    Time frame: Week 16

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Participants Who Achieve Psoriatic Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 Response at Week 16 Among Participants with Baseline Body Surface Area (BSA) Greater Than Equal to (>=) 3 Percent (%) and an IGA Score of >=2 at Baseline

    The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 to 6, and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. A PASI 75 response represents participants who achieved at least a 75 percent improvement from baseline in the PASI score.

    Time frame: Week 16

  2. Proportion of Participants Who Achieve PASI 90 Response at Week 16 Among Participants with Baseline BSA >=3% and an IGA Score of >=2 at Baseline

    The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 to 6, and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. A PASI 90 response represents participants who achieved at least a 90 percent improvement from baseline in the PASI score.

    Time frame: Week 16

  3. Proportion of Participants Who Achieve PASI 100 Response at Week 16 Among Participants with Baseline BSA >=3% and an IGA Score of >=2 at Baseline

    The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 to 6, and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. A PASI 100 response represents participants who achieved at least a 100 percent improvement from baseline in the PASI score.

    Time frame: Week 16

  4. Proportion of Participants with an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Psoriasis Score of 0 or 1 And >=2 Grade Improvement From Baseline at Week 16 Among Participants with Baseline BSA >=3% and an IGA Score of >=2 at Baseline

    Proportion of participants with an IGA psoriasis score of 0 or 1 and \>=2 grade improvement from baseline at week 16 among participants with \>=3% BSA and an IGA score of \>=2 at baseline will be reported. The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participant's psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling, each using a 5-point scale: using 0 (no evidence), 1 (minimal), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe) scale. The IGA score of psoriasis is based upon the average of induration, erythema, and scaling scores. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).

    Time frame: Week 16

  5. Proportion of Participants who Achieve an ACR 50 Response at Week 16

    The ACR 50 responders are participants with an improvement of \>= 50 % from baseline in both the tender and swollen joint count and in at least 3 of the 5 assessments (patient's assessment of pain VAS, patient's global assessment of disease activity VAS scale, physician's global assessment of disease activity VAS scale, health assessment questionnaire and C-reactive protein).

    Time frame: Week 16

  6. Proportion of Participants who Achieve an ACR 70 Response at Week 16

    The ACR 70 responders are participants with an improvement of \>= 70 % from baseline in both the tender and swollen joint count and in at least 3 of the 5 assessments (patient's assessment of pain VAS, patient's global assessment of disease activity VAS scale, Physician's global assessment of disease activity VAS scale, health assessment questionnaire and C-reactive protein).

    Time frame: Week 16

  7. Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score At Week 16

    The HAQ-DI score consists of questions referring to 8 categories: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and common daily activities. Responses in each functional area are scored from 0 to 3 (0=no difficulty and 3=inability to perform a task in that area). Overall score is computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range is 0-3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty.

    Time frame: From Baseline to Week 16

  8. Changes From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Week 16

    SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and wellbeing: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for a domain is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). Score from physical function, role physical, bodily pain, and general health domains are averaged to calculate PCS. Total score range for PCS is 0-100 (100=highest level of physical functioning).

    Time frame: From Baseline to Week 16

  9. Proportion of Participants With Resolution of Enthesitis at Week 16 Among Those With Enthesitis at Baseline

    Enthesitis will be assessed using the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI). The LEI was developed to assess enthesitis in participants with PsA, and evaluates the presence (score of 1) or absence of pain (score of 0) by applying local pressure to lateral elbow epicondyle, left and right, medial femoral condyle, left and right, and achilles tendon insertion, left and right. LEI scores ranging from 0 (0 sites with tenderness) to 6 (worst possible score; 6 sites with tenderness). Resolution is defined as participants have enteritis (LEI score \>0) at baseline and no enthesis (LEO score =0) at the visit (week 16).

    Time frame: Week 16

  10. Change From Baseline in Enthesitis Score (LEI) at Week 16 in Participants With Enthesitis at Baseline

    Enthesitis will be assessed using the LEI. The LEI was developed to assess enthesitis in participants with PsA, and evaluates the presence (score of 1) or absence of pain (score of 0) by applying local pressure to Lateral elbow epicondyle, left and right, Medial femoral condyle, left and right, and Achilles tendon insertion, left and right. LEI total scores ranging from 0 (0 sites with tenderness) to 6 (worst possible score; 6 sites with tenderness).

    Time frame: From Baseline to Week 16

  11. Proportion of Participants With Resolution of Dactylitis at Week 16 Among Those With Dactylitis at Baseline

    Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. The severity of dactylitis is scored on a scale of 0-3, where 0=tenderness and 3=extreme tenderness in each digit of the hands and feet. The range of total dactylitis scores for a participant is 0-60. Higher score indicates greater degree of tenderness. Resolution is defined as participants have dactylitis (score \>0) at baseline and no dactylitis (score =0) at the visit (week 16).

    Time frame: Week 16

  12. Change From Baseline in Dactylitis Score at Week 16 in Participants With Dactylitis at Baseline

    Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. The severity of dactylitis is scored on a scale of 0-3, where 0=tenderness and 3=extreme tenderness in each digit of the hands and feet. The range of total dactylitis scores for a participant is 0-60. Higher score indicates greater degree of tenderness.

    Time frame: From Baseline to Week 16

  13. Proportion of Participants who Achieve Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) at Week 16

    MDA criteria are a composite of 7 outcome measures used in PsA. Participants are classified as achieving MDA if they fulfill 5 of 7 outcome measures: tender joint count less than or equal to (\<=) 1; swollen joint count \<= 1; psoriasis activity and severity index \<= 1 or body surface area \<= 3; patient pain VAS score of \<= 15; patient global disease activity VAS (arthritis and psoriasis) score of \<= 20; health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) score \<= 0.5; and tender entheseal points \<= 1.

    Time frame: Week 16

  14. Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Score at Week 16

    The FACIT-fatigue is a self-administered, 13-item questionnaire measuring items on tiredness, weakness, and difficulty conducting usual activities due to fatigue. Responses to all items are rated on a 5-point likert response scale ranging from 0 "not at all" to 4 "very much." The total score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher values indicating less fatigue.

    Time frame: From Baseline to Week 16

07

Study locations

155 sites
  • Arthritis and Rheumatism Associates ARA Jonesboro
    Jonesboro, Arkansas 72401, United States
  • Omega Research Consultants
    DeBary, Florida 32713, United States
  • Integral Rheumatology And Immunology Specialists
    Plantation, Florida 33324, United States
  • Clinical Research of West Florida
    Tampa, Florida 33606, United States
  • Willow Rheumatology and Wellness PLLC
    Willowbrook, Illinois 60527, United States
  • Joint and Muscle Research Institute
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28204, United States
  • Altoona Center For Clinical Research
    Duncansville, Pennsylvania 16635, United States
  • Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Institute
    Allen, Texas 75013, United States
  • Naiara Alvarez MD Integrative Rheumatology of South TX
    Harlingen, Texas 78550, United States
  • Cosultorios Reumatologógicos Pampa
    Buenos Aires, 1428, Argentina
  • Mindout Research
    Buenos Aires, C1417EYG, Argentina
  • Hospital Central Militar Cirujano Mayor Dr Cosme Argerich
    Buenos Aires, C1426BOS, Argentina
  • Arsema
    Ciudad de Buenos Aires, C1431, Argentina
  • Centro Medico Privado de Reumatologia Tucuman
    Ciudad de San Miguel de Tucuman, T4000AXL, Argentina
  • Consultora Integral de Salud SRL
    Córdoba, CP5000, Argentina
  • MR Medicina Reumatologica
    San Fernando, B1646GHP, Argentina
  • Instituto Medico De Alta Complejidad (IMAC)
    San Isidro, B1642IPN, Argentina
  • Ipswich Hospital
    Ipswich, 4305, Australia
  • Rheumatology Research Unit
    Maroochydore, 4558, Australia
  • BJC Health
    Parramatta, 2150, Australia
  • Queen Elizabeth Hospital
    South Woodville, 5011, Australia
  • Royal Darwin Hospital
    Tiwi, 0810, Australia
  • MC Medtech Services Ltd
    Haskovo, 6304, Bulgaria
  • Exacta Medica
    Pleven, 5803, Bulgaria
  • Medical Center Artmed
    Plovdiv, 4002, Bulgaria
  • Medical Center Teodora
    Rousse, 7012, Bulgaria
  • Peking University Third Hospital
    Beijing, 100191, China
  • Beijing Tong Ren Hospital Capital Medical University
    Beijing, 100730, China
  • The First Bethune Hospital of Jilin University
    Changchun, 130021, China
  • Xiangya Hospital Central South University
    Changsha, 410008, China
  • West China Hospital Sichuan University
    Chengdu, 610041, China
  • Sichuan Provincial Peoples Hospital
    Chengdu, 610072, China
  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
    Chongqing, 4000016, China
  • Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical Hospital
    Guangzhou, 510515, China
  • The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University
    Guiyang, 561113, China
  • Linyi City People Hospital
    Linyi, 276002, China
  • Jiangxi Provincial Peoples Hospital
    Nanchang, 330006, China
  • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
    Nanchang, 330008, China
  • Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University
    Nantong, 226001, China
  • Pingxiang People's Hospital
    Pingxiang, 337055, China
  • Huashan Hospital Fudan University
    Shanghai, 200040, China
  • Shanghai skin disease hospital
    Shanghai, 200443, China
  • Shenzhen People s Hospital
    Shenzhen, 518020, China
  • The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University
    Shijiazhuang, 050051, China
  • Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University
    Suzhou, 215000, China
  • Shanxi Bethune Hospital
    Taiyuan, 030032, China
  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
    Wenzhou, 325000, China
  • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University
    Xi'an, 710006, China
  • Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University
    Zhenjiang, 212001, China
  • Revmatologie s r o
    Brno, 63800, Czechia
  • Revmacentrum MUDr Mostera s r o
    Brno-Židenice, 615 00, Czechia
  • RHEUMA s r o
    Břeclav, 690 02, Czechia
  • L K N Arthrocentrum
    Hlučín, 748 01, Czechia
  • Revimex Pro s r o
    Karvina Frystat, 73301, Czechia
  • CCR Ostrava S R O
    Ostrava, 70200, Czechia
  • MUDr Rosypalova s r o
    Ostrava, 70800, Czechia
  • Revmatologicky ustav
    Prague, 128 00, Czechia
  • Revmatologicka Ordinace
    Prague, 140 00, Czechia
  • Thomayerova nemocnice
    Prague, 140 59, Czechia
  • FN Motol
    Prague, 150 00, Czechia
  • Medical Plus S R O
    Uherské Hradiště, 68601, Czechia
  • PV Medical S R O
    Zlín, 76001, Czechia
  • Aarhus University Hospital
    Aarhus N, 8200, Denmark
  • Sydvestjysk Sygehus
    Esbjerg, 6700, Denmark
  • Frederiksberg Hospital
    Frederiksberg, 2000, Denmark
  • Regionshospitalet Godstrup
    Herning, 7400, Denmark
  • Svendborg Hospital Odense University Hospital
    Svendborg, 5700, Denmark
  • Vejle Sygehus
    Vejle, 7100, Denmark
  • Fachklinik Bad Bentheim
    Bad Bentheim, 48455, Germany
  • Charite Universitaetsmedizin Berlin
    Berlin, 10117, Germany
  • ISA - Interdisciplinary Study Association GmbH
    Berlin, 10789, Germany
  • Universitatsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden
    Dresden, 01307, Germany
  • Medizinische Fakultat der Albert Ludwigs Universitat Freiburg
    Freiburg im Breisgau, 79104, Germany
  • Hamburger Rheuma Forschungszentrum II
    Hamburg, 20095, Germany
  • Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet
    Herne, 44649, Germany
  • Studienzentrum Dr Schwarz Germany
    Langenau, 89129, Germany
  • Johannes Wesling Klinikum Minden
    Minden, 32429, Germany
  • Universitatsklinikum Tubingen
    Tübingen, 72076, Germany
  • Prince of Wales Hospital
    Hong Kong, 000000, Hong Kong
  • Betegapolo Irgalmas Rend Budai Irgalmasrendi Korhaz
    Budapest, 1027, Hungary
  • Revita Kft
    Budapest, 1027, Hungary
  • Obudai Egeszsegugyi Centrum Kft
    Budapest, 1036, Hungary
  • Synexus Magyarorszag Kft
    Budapest, 1036, Hungary
  • Qualiclinic Kft
    Budapest, 1134, Hungary
  • Uno Medical Trials Ltd.
    Budapest, 1152, Hungary
  • University of Debrecen
    Debrecen, 4032, Hungary
  • Bekes Varmegyei Kozponti Korhaz Pandy Kalman Tagkorhaz
    Gyula, 5700, Hungary
  • Obudai Egeszsegugyi Centrum Kft 1
    Kaposvár, 7400, Hungary
  • University of Szeged
    Szeged, 6725, Hungary
  • MAV Korhaz es Rendelointezet
    Szolnok, 5000, Hungary
  • Vital Medical Center Orvosi es Fogaszati Kozpont
    Veszprém, 8200, Hungary
  • Marengo Cims Hospital
    Ahmedabad, 380060, India
  • Apollo Hospitals
    Bhubaneswar, 751005, India
  • Nizams Institute of Medical Sciences
    Hyderabad, 500082, India
  • Apollo Multispeciality Hospital Ltd
    Kolkata, 700054, India
  • Kokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani Hsp And Med Research Inst
    Mumbai, 400053, India
  • JSS Hospital
    Mysuru, 570004, India
  • All India Institute of Medical Sciences
    New Delhi, 110029, India
  • Indraprastha Apollo Hospital
    New Delhi, 1100776, India
  • Fortis Hospital
    Noida, 201301, India

Showing the first 100 of 155 sites across 16 countries.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The data sharing policy of Johnson \& Johnson Innovative Medicine is available at innovativemedicine.jnj.com/our-innovation/clinical-trials/transparency. As noted on this site, requests for access to the study data can be submitted through Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project site at yoda.yale.edu

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Minor edits
Nothing that changes what the study is or who can join. Edited: verification date
1 update, last Sep 25, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Sep 25, 2026
    Minor edits only
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06878404
Lead sponsor
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 17, 2025
Start date
Feb 21, 2025
Primary completion
May 25, 2026
Completion
Feb 4, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 25, 2026

Study contacts

Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial
study director · Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion