ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06866431PiezocleanUpdated May 28, 2025

Effect Of Cavitation In Post-Extractive Socket Healing

An observational study in Cavitation and Healing of Extraction Socket, sponsored by International Piezosurgery Academy. Recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-28.

Sponsored by International Piezosurgery Academy · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Mar 2026, 7 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Apr 2025; still recruiting 1 year 7 months later.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
84
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In everyday clinical practice, the proper management of the post-extraction socket is crucial in order to enable an optimal healing of the wound and a close post-surgical monitoring is critical to prevent possible complications. After an injury, the cellular reaction starts early, presenting significant changes as soon as 12 to 24 hours later. Favourable wound healing begins with the timely formation, organization, stabilization, and attachment of the blood clot. The stability of the clot is influenced by various factors including the host response, local anatomical characteristics, presence of bacteria and severity of surgical trauma. Delayed healing can lead to increased complications, patient discomfort, and potential procedure failures. In the light of these considerations, the proven effectiveness of piezoelectric devices to facilitate healing mechanisms is known in literature. Inverse piezoelectric effect, as used in current devices, creates mechanical shock waves that oscillate linearly at sonic and ultrasonic frequencies (from 30 to 30.000 Hz). In addition, mechanical micro-movements with a frequency between approximately 24 and 30 kHz create a cavitation effect in the irrigation solution, limiting intraoperative bleeding, thereby increasing the visibility and safety of the procedure.

The purpose of the present study is to evaluate if the application of cavitation effect of post-extractive socket is capable of reducing healing time and Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) values.

Read the detailed description

Methods: Subjects referring to the clinical centers with the clinical indication of extraction of two contralateral single-rooted teeth of the same arch are suitable for enrollment. Teeth to be extracted should be characterized by the following condition: deep unrecoverable decay; untreatable endodontic issue; untreatable crow-root fracture.

The same surgical extractive protocol will be performed in both sites. Following local anesthesia and periotomy, flapless extraction will be performed using forceps and elevators. After socket debridement with Lucas surgical curette, the extraction sockets will be randomly divided into test and control group. Test group sites will receive 90 seconds of ultrasonic cavitation treatment with 0.9% sodium chloride via a specific insert (Piezoclean, Esacrom, Imola, Italy) driven by a piezoelectric device with the following modalities: i) piezo settings: SURGERY 1 U 040 V 080 P 100; ii) no pressure should be applied to prevent the steel insert from coming into contact with the bone; iii) do not create a complete seal to avoid heating the liquid, which could cause potential discomfort or harm to the patient.

In control group, a simple 0.9% sodium chloride irrigation (control group) will be performed.

An "X" suture will be then applied using non-resorbable synthetic monofilament. All patients will be instructed in post-extractive domiciliary care. Paracetamol 1g every 8 hours in case of pain will be prescribed.

Patients will be given a questionnaire to fill out daily, entering a score on the NPRS (from 1 to 10) for 7 days, where a score of 0 indicates "no pain" and a score of 10 indicates "very severe pain", along with the number of paracetamol intakes per day. Follow-ups will be scheduled for day-3, day-7 for suture removal, day-14, day 21 for final check.

On day 3, day 7, day 14 and day 21 the maturation and quality of tissues will be evaluated using a modified version of the Healing Index (HI) that involves 3 scoring levels for each of the 4 parameters considered:

  • tissue color (1 = 100% of gingiva pink; 2 ≤ 50% of gingiva red, hyperemic, movable; 3 ≥ 50% of gingiva red, hyperemic, movable);
  • color and consistency of the healing tissue (1 = close grained, pink; 2 = soft, red; 3 = fragile, greenish or grayish);
  • suppuration (1 = absent; 2 = absent but pronounced amount of plaque around socket walls; 3 = pronounced);
  • bleeding (1 = absent; 2 = induced by palpation; 3 = spontaneous). The total score ranged from 4 (excellent healing) to 12 (severely impaired healing).

Study design: Prospective randomized clinical trial.

Study population: The study will be conducted in an outpatient hospital setting.

Subject numerosity: The outcome of the study involves the evaluation of the application of cavitation effect via piezoelectric device on post-extractive sockets.

To date, there are no studies in the literature reporting results regarding the application of cavitation that may be used for an adequate sample size calculation.

Therefore, a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was considered to be a difference between the means of the group 1 and the group 2 of 0.5 points on NPRS at T1 (3gg), with a standard deviation of 1 point. With alpha set at 0.05 and power set at 0.8, a sample size of 62 statistical units per group was calculated.

Each center will treat 12 patients with bilateral extractions (7 centers = 84 patients), to compensate possible drop-outs during the study.

Enrollment procedure: all patients who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be enrolled in the study following the administration of the Information Sheet and the acquisition of informed consent.

Data collection: Data will be entered in an Excel database, which can be accessed using specific usernames and passwords in the possession of the staff involved in the study. The data will be entered anonymously by associating a numeric ID to each patient.

Data analysis: Statistical analysis will be performed by means of a computerized statistical package (SigmaStat 3.5, SPSS Inc., Germany). Data will be expressed as mean ± SD and median (interquartile range), respectively, for parametric and nonparametric values. Data will be normalized and difference in NPRS between the treatments at the various timepoints will be analyzed with descriptive statistics to assess whether they have a normal distribution; both equal variance and normality tests will be used. Hypotheses will be tested using unpaired t-test in case of normally distributed data, while Mann-Whitney U-test will be performed to compare nonparametric values.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cavitation
  • Healing of Extraction Socket
03

In context

Lead sponsor

International Piezosurgery Academy is the lead sponsor of 24 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

people with two single rooted hopeless teeth of the same arch to be extracted

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age between 18 and 100 years
  • Two single rooted hopeless teeth of the same arch to be extracted
  • ASA scale value equal or less than 3
  • Signed

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • General for dental and/or surgical treatments
  • Inflammatory and disease of the oral cavity
  • Uncontrolled diabetes ( > 7.5%)
  • History of requiring chemotherapy or radiotherapy within the past five years
  • Previous bisphosphonate or high dose therapy
  • Heavy smokers (> 20 cigarettes /day)
  • Pregnancy or lactating women
  • No compliance
  • Extraction performed after raising a flap and/or with osteotomy
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
84 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Piezoclean

    Ultrasonic cavitation treatment with 0.9% sodium chloride via a specific insert (Piezoclean, Esacrom, Imola, Italy) driven by a piezoelectric device in post extractive socket

    Procedure: Piezoclean

  • Control

    Simple 0.9% sodium chloride irrigation in post extractive socket

    Procedure: Control

Interventions

  • ProcedurePiezoclean

    Following local anesthesia and periotomy, flapless extraction will be performed using forceps and elevators. After socket debridement with Lucas surgical curette, the extraction sockets will be randomly divided into test and control group.Test group sites will receive 90 seconds of ultrasonic cavitation treatment with 0.9% sodium chloride via a specific insert (Piezoclean, Esacrom, Imola, Italy) driven by a piezoelectric device with the following modalities: i) piezo settings: SURGERY 1 U 040 V 080 P 100; ii) no pressure should be applied to prevent the steel insert from coming into contact with the bone; iii) do not create a complete seal to avoid heating the liquid, which could cause potential discomfort or harm to the patient. An "X" suture will be then applied using non-resorbable synthetic monofilament.

  • ProcedureControl

    Following local anesthesia and periotomy, flapless extraction will be performed using forceps and elevators. After socket debridement with Lucas surgical curette, the extraction sockets will be randomly divided into test and control group. In control group, a simple 0.9% sodium chloride irrigation (control group) will be performed. An "X" suture will be then applied using non-resorbable synthetic monofilament.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Maturation and quality of tissues in post extractive socket

    The maturation and quality of tissues will be evaluated using a modified version of the Healing Index (HI) that involves 3 scoring levels for each of the 4 parameters considered: * tissue color (1 = 100% of gingiva pink; 2 ≤ 50% of gingiva red, hyperemic, movable; 3 ≥ 50% of gingiva red, hyperemic, movable); * color and consistency of the healing tissue (1 = close grained, pink; 2 = soft, red; 3 = fragile, greenish or grayish); * suppuration (1 = absent; 2 = absent but pronounced amount of plaque around socket walls; 3 = pronounced); * bleeding (1 = absent; 2 = induced by palpation; 3 = spontaneous). The total score ranged from 4 (excellent healing) to 12 (severely impaired healing).

    Time frame: 3 days after tooth extraction

  2. Maturation and quality of tissues in post extractive socket

    The maturation and quality of tissues will be evaluated using a modified version of the Healing Index (HI) that involves 3 scoring levels for each of the 4 parameters considered: * tissue color (1 = 100% of gingiva pink; 2 ≤ 50% of gingiva red, hyperemic, movable; 3 ≥ 50% of gingiva red, hyperemic, movable); * color and consistency of the healing tissue (1 = close grained, pink; 2 = soft, red; 3 = fragile, greenish or grayish); * suppuration (1 = absent; 2 = absent but pronounced amount of plaque around socket walls; 3 = pronounced); * bleeding (1 = absent; 2 = induced by palpation; 3 = spontaneous). The total score ranged from 4 (excellent healing) to 12 (severely impaired healing).

    Time frame: 7 days after tooth extraction

  3. Maturation and quality of tissues in post extractive socket

    The maturation and quality of tissues will be evaluated using a modified version of the Healing Index (HI) that involves 3 scoring levels for each of the 4 parameters considered: * tissue color (1 = 100% of gingiva pink; 2 ≤ 50% of gingiva red, hyperemic, movable; 3 ≥ 50% of gingiva red, hyperemic, movable); * color and consistency of the healing tissue (1 = close grained, pink; 2 = soft, red; 3 = fragile, greenish or grayish); * suppuration (1 = absent; 2 = absent but pronounced amount of plaque around socket walls; 3 = pronounced); * bleeding (1 = absent; 2 = induced by palpation; 3 = spontaneous). The total score ranged from 4 (excellent healing) to 12 (severely impaired healing).

    Time frame: 14 days after tooth extraction

  4. Maturation and quality of tissues in post extractive socket

    The maturation and quality of tissues will be evaluated using a modified version of the Healing Index (HI) that involves 3 scoring levels for each of the 4 parameters considered: * tissue color (1 = 100% of gingiva pink; 2 ≤ 50% of gingiva red, hyperemic, movable; 3 ≥ 50% of gingiva red, hyperemic, movable); * color and consistency of the healing tissue (1 = close grained, pink; 2 = soft, red; 3 = fragile, greenish or grayish); * suppuration (1 = absent; 2 = absent but pronounced amount of plaque around socket walls; 3 = pronounced); * bleeding (1 = absent; 2 = induced by palpation; 3 = spontaneous). The total score ranged from 4 (excellent healing) to 12 (severely impaired healing).

    Time frame: 21 days after tooth extraction

Secondary outcomes

  1. NPRS

    The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) is an 11-point numeric scale, ranging from 0 indicating no pain to 10 indicating worst pain imaginable.

    Time frame: on the day of extraction

  2. NPRS

    The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) is an 11-point numeric scale, ranging from 0 indicating no pain to 10 indicating worst pain imaginable.

    Time frame: on the first day after extraction

  3. NPRS

    The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) is an 11-point numeric scale, ranging from 0 indicating no pain to 10 indicating worst pain imaginable.

    Time frame: on the second day after extraction

  4. NPRS

    The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) is an 11-point numeric scale, ranging from 0 indicating no pain to 10 indicating worst pain imaginable.

    Time frame: on the third day after extraction

  5. NPRS

    The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) is an 11-point numeric scale, ranging from 0 indicating no pain to 10 indicating worst pain imaginable.

    Time frame: on the fourth day after extraction

  6. NPRS

    The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) is an 11-point numeric scale, ranging from 0 indicating no pain to 10 indicating worst pain imaginable.

    Time frame: on the fifth day after extraction

  7. NPRS

    The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) is an 11-point numeric scale, ranging from 0 indicating no pain to 10 indicating worst pain imaginable.

    Time frame: on the sixth day after extraction

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Apr 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Mar 2026, 11 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 4, 2025
First posted
Mar 10, 2025
StartActual
Apr 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Mar 31, 2026
CompletionEst.
Mar 31, 2026
Last update
May 28, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 28, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06866431
Lead sponsor
International Piezosurgery Academy
Responsible party
Mr. Claudio Stacchi, DDS, MSc (Adjunct Professor, University of Trieste) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 10, 2025
Start date
Apr 1, 2025
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
May 28, 2025

Study contacts

Claudio Stacchi, Dott.
Contact
claudio@stacchi.it
+39 0403992254

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion