An interventional study of smart integrated care services in Smart Community- and Home-based Integrated Care Services, sponsored by Liu Zhihan. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 60 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-26.
Sponsored by Liu Zhihan · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research
In recent years, the widespread application of emerging information technologies such as artificial intelligence, the Internet of Things, big data, cloud computing, and 5G has made "smart " a new breakthrough in the integrated healthcare and elderly care model. Smart Community- and Home-based Integrated Care Services , utilizing methods such as home hospital beds and mobile medical visits, ensure that key elderly groups with disabilities, dementia, chronic diseases, advanced age, and disabilities can receive the necessary medical services at home. This not only allows the elderly to live in familiar home environments, maintaining their independence and dignity, but also alleviates the pressure on medical resources, enabling more resources to be allocated to emergency care and highly specialized nursing. However, the smart healthcare and elderly care platform model is still in the pilot stage and requires more scientific evidence to verify its actual impact on the health of the elderly.
The purpose： The purpose of this clinical trial is to understand and verify the potential health improvement effects of the smart healthcare and elderly care platform on the elderly. By collecting health indicator data at different time points before and after the intervention, the study will compare the differences in health indicators between community-dwelling elderly who have used the smart healthcare and elderly care platform and those who have not, providing scientific evidence for the promotion of the smart healthcare and elderly care platform model and further facilitating its application and popularization among the elderly in the community.
The main question it aims to answer is: Are community-dwelling elderly who use the smart healthcare and elderly care platform healthier than those who do not use the service? Participants will： Participants will be randomly divided into an experimental group and a control group. The elderly in the experimental group will use the "Hunan Province Integrated Healthcare and Elderly Care Intelligent Service Platform," while the control group will not use the platform for blank control.
Data collection： The research team will collect health indicator data four times, including SF-36, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), and the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), at baseline, 3 months post-intervention, 6 months post-intervention, and 12 months post-intervention.
I. Recruitment Phase:
The study will recruit participants from Guoyuan Town, Changsha County. Eligible elderly individuals from rural communities will undergo qualification assessment based on inclusion/exclusion criteria. Accounting for a 20% attrition rate, the study plans to enroll 64 elderly participants from rural communities in Guoyuan Town.
II. Intervention Allocation Phase:
Participants will be randomly assigned to either the experimental or control group using computer-generated randomization. Baseline measurements will be collected using:
SF-36 Health Survey
Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scale
Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)
The experimental group will receive integrated care services through the "Hunan Province Integrated Smart Healthcare and Elderly Care Service Platform", while the control group will receive standard community care. The intervention includes:
Educational seminars introducing "Hunan Province Integrated Smart Healthcare and Elderly Care Service Platform" services
Assistance with platform registration for experimental group participants
Implementation of integrated care services via the platform
III. Follow-up Phase:
Three follow-up assessments will be conducted at:
3 months post-intervention
6 months post-intervention
12 months post-intervention
Follow-up assessments will repeat baseline measurements (SF-36, ADL, GDS) to evaluate health status changes. Participant attrition will be documented through follow-up tracking. All data will undergo double-entry verification using two independent data clerks maintaining separate files, with regular cross-verification and final reconciliation after the last follow-up.
IV. Analysis Phase:
Statistical comparisons between groups will be performed using:
Independent t-tests
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
This is the only study on the registry with Liu Zhihan as lead sponsor.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria
Receiving integrated care services through the "Hunan Province Medical Elderly Integration Intelligent Service Platform".
Behavioral: smart integrated care services
Receive regular community care services, with no intervention, as a blank control
Provide integrated care services through the 'Hunan Province Integrated Healthcare and Elderly Care Intelligent Service Platform,' including home-based care, mobile medical visits, and remote diagnosis and treatment services."
SF-36 scale (Short Form 36 Health Survey)
The SF-36 (Short Form 36 Health Survey) is a tool used to assess health-related quality of life across 8 dimensions, each scored from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates better health. The 8 dimensions are: Physical Functioning (PF): Ability to perform physical activities. Role-Physical (RP): Limitations due to physical health. Bodily Pain (BP): Pain intensity and impact. General Health (GH): Overall health perception. Vitality (VT): Energy levels and fatigue. Social Functioning (SF): Impact on social activities. Role-Emotional (RE): Limitations due to emotional problems. Mental Health (MH): Psychological well-being. Scores are calculated based on responses, with 0 representing the worst health and 100 the best. The higher the total score, the better the health.
Time frame: Measurements were taken to obtain data after interventions at three months, six months, and twelve months.
ADL scale（（Activity of Daily Living）
ADL (Activities of Daily Living) is used to assess an individual's ability to perform basic activities of daily living, particularly self-care functions.The score for each option in the scale will be reported, with the minimum score for each option being 0 and the maximum score being 3. The scores will then be summed, with the total score having a minimum value of 0 and a maximum value of 20.Total possible scores range from 0 - 20, with lower scores indicating increased disability. If used to measure improvement after rehabilitation, changes of more than two points in the total score reflect a probable genuine change, and change on one item from fully dependent to independent is also likely to be reliable.
Time frame: Measurements were taken to obtain data after interventions at three months, six months, and twelve months.
GDS scale（Geriatric Depression Scale)
The GDS will evaluate the mental status of the elderly, using a questionnaire format.The GDS scale contains 15 items, and participants answer with "Yes" or "No." Each "Yes" is scored 1 point, and each "No" is scored 0 points. The total score is the sum of the individual item scores. A higher total score indicates more pronounced depressive symptoms. A score of ≥6 points suggests the presence of depressive mood, 0-5 points indicates no depressive mood, 6-9 points indicates mild depressive mood, and 10-12 points indicates severe depressive mood.
Time frame: Measurements were taken to obtain data after interventions at three months, six months, and twelve months.
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: No
This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.