ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06847126Updated Apr 13, 2025

Empirical Intravenous Beta-Lactam Plus Metronidazole Vs Oral Cefixime Plus Metronidazole for the Treatment of Liver Abscess

A Phase 3 interventional study of Intravenous beta-lactam antimicrobial for 2 weeks Plus Intravenous Metronidazole (750 mg q 8 hourly) for 2 weeks and Tablet Cefixime (200 mg q 12 hourly) for 2 weeks Plus Tablet Metronidazole (800 mg q 8 hourly) for 2 weeks in Liver Abscess, sponsored by Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh. Recruiting at 1 site in India. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-13.

Sponsored by Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2026, 3 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Feb 2025; still recruiting 1 year 8 months later.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
220
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Liver abscess (LA) is potentially life threatening medical emergency requiring prompt medical intervention. The backbone of therapy is prompt empirical antimicrobial with or without percutaneous drainage/ aspiration of the abscess. The standard care for liver abscess includes empirical antimicrobials consisting both antibacterial and amoebicidal agents along with percutaneous drainage or aspiration of the collection. The antimicrobial regimen should cover against E. histolytica until microbial etiology is established or liver abscess of amoebic etiology is ruled out. But still there is no straightforward general agreement or evidence based on clinical studies regarding the standard protocol for empirical antimicrobials concerning choice, route of administration or duration of antimicrobials therapy. Most of the experts preferred intravenous antimicrobials over oral antimicrobials for the treatment of liver abscess with or without complication. But, there is no clinical trial evidence to support the rational of using intravenous antibiotics up front instead of oral antimicrobials. Recently published institutional study also suggested that empirical oral antimicrobials (Cefexime/Ciprofloxacin) were efficacious for the treatment of uncomplicated liver abscess, successfully managing around 90 % cases of liver abscess. When treating a liver abscess, the choice of antimicrobials and the administration technique must be specially tailored depending upon the existence of complications and the patient's clinical reaction. In the absence of clinical trials, the rational for using of intravenous broad spectrum antibiotics upfront instead of oral antimicrobials for the treatment of liver abscess with or without complications is doubtful and may appear injudicious contributing future rise of antimicrobial resistance. The use of intravenous antibiotics upfront may also unnecessarily lengthen hospital stays, enhance therapeutic expenditure, and raise the risk of hospital-acquired infections in patients who are capable for taking antimicrobials orally. Oral antimicrobials strategy will promote earlier discharge from the hospital and the patient can return to usual activities earlier. This study aims to provide valuable insights into the comparison and efficacy of empirical intravenous Beta-lactam antimicrobials plus Metronidazole and oral Cefixime plus Metronidazole therapy for the treatment of uncomplicated liver abscess. In this randomised controlled open label clinical trial all the patients with newly diagnosed liver abscess confirmed with radiology imaging, either by USG or CT scan, presenting at emergency or medical OPD will be screened for enrolment in the study. Following written informed consent from the participants and/or their legal guardian, those who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be recruited in the study. Subsequently the participants will be randomized into either intravenous or oral antimicrobial group. The intravenous-group will receive Beta-lactam antimicrobials (i.e Piperacillin-Tazobactum 4.5g q 8 hourly or Ceftriaxone 1g q 12 hourly or Meropenem 1g q 8 hourly or Imipenem-Cilastatin 500mg q 6 hourly) Plus intravenous Metronidazole 750mg q 8 hourly for 2weeks. The oral-group will receive tablet Cefixime 200 mg q 12 hourly plus tablet Metronidazole 800 mg q 8 hourly for 2 weeks. Both the group will be provided standard care of therapy including percutaneous drainage or aspiration as per indication and will be followed up for 8 weeks. The primary outcome of clinical cure and secondary outcome of incidence of treatment failure, mortality, duration of antimicrobial therapy, recurrence, adverse drug reaction (ADR), complications will be compared between the groups.

02

Conditions studied

  • Liver Abscess

Keywords

  • Liver Abscess, Empirical antimicrobials, Beta-lactam antimicrobials, Intravenous, Oral, Cefixime, Metronidazole
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh is the lead sponsor of 296 studies on the registry; 44 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria: All symptomatic patients with liver abscess verified by radiological imaging, either by computed tomography (CT) scan or ultrasound (USG), regardless of gender (male or female) and age ≥ 18 years, will be screened for registration in the study.

-

Exclusion Criteria: Patients with past history of liver abscess, chronic kidney disease (CKD), hypersensitivity to either Metronidazole or Cefixime or Beta-lactam antimicrobials will not be allowed to participate in the study. Patients with organ dysfunction with shock (blood pressure \< 90/60 mmHg), acute respiratory distress syndrome requiring oxygen therapy (PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 300 or SpO2 ≤92%), encephalopathy (altered sensorium with GCS \< 15), acute kidney injury (increase in serum creatinine to ≥ 1.5 times from the baseline or serum creatinine ≥ 1.5) and not able to take orally will not be considered for participation in the study. Patients who are pregnant, have already received antimicrobials for more than 48 hours before to admission, or are receiving blood thinners such as antiplatelets or anticoagulants within 4 weeks of presentation and are unwilling to provide informed consent will also be excluded from the trial.

-

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
220 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Intravenous Beta-Lactam antimicrobials

    Intravenous beta-lactam antimicrobial for 2 weeks Plus Intravenous Metronidazole (750 mg q 8 hourly) for 2 weeks and standard care

    Drug: Intravenous beta-lactam antimicrobial for 2 weeks Plus Intravenous Metronidazole (750 mg q 8 hourly) for 2 weeks · Other: Standard medical care

  • Active comparator
    Oral Cefixime

    Tablet Cefixime (200 mg q 12 hourly) for 2 weeks Plus Table Metronidazole (800 mg q 8 hourly) for 2 weeks and standard care

    Drug: Tablet Cefixime (200 mg q 12 hourly) for 2 weeks Plus Tablet Metronidazole (800 mg q 8 hourly) for 2 weeks · Other: Standard medical care

Interventions

  • DrugIntravenous beta-lactam antimicrobial for 2 weeks Plus Intravenous Metronidazole (750 mg q 8 hourly) for 2 weeks

    Intravenous beta-lactam antimicrobial for 2 weeks Plus Intravenous Metronidazole (750 mg q 8 hourly) for 2 weeks and standard care

    Also known as: Standard care

  • DrugTablet Cefixime (200 mg q 12 hourly) for 2 weeks Plus Tablet Metronidazole (800 mg q 8 hourly) for 2 weeks

    Tablet Cefixime (200 mg q 12 hourly) for 2 weeks Plus Tablet Metronidazole (800 mg q 8 hourly) for 2 weeks

    Also known as: Standard Medical care

  • OtherStandard medical care

    Percutaneous drainage or aspiration of the abscess along resuscitative and symptomatic medications

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinical cure

    "clinical cure" is defined as defined as participants becoming asymptomatic with fever resolution for ≥48 hours, including USG demonstrating no drainable or aspiratable collection in the liver along with removal of the pigtail catheter if any.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  2. Treatment failure

    "Treatment failure" is defined as the fulfilling of any one or more of the following conditions: 1. Persistently symptomatic even after 72 h of empirical antimicrobial therapy and percutaneous aspiration or drainage of the hepatic collection 2. Emergence of fresh or additional collection in the liver during the course of empirical antimicrobial therapy 3. Emergence of shock and or new onset organ failure (Encephalopathy, ARDS, AKI, MODS) during the course of therapy, leading to modification of oral antimicrobials to intravenous antimicrobials or up gradation of the ongoing intravenous antimicrobials 4. If pus culture demonstrates growth of microorganism which is not sensitive to the ongoing antimicrobials (intravenous Beta-lactam or oral Cefixime) along with inadequate clinical response to the therapy 5. Participants requiring persistent drainage or repeated aspiration of the abscess even after 4 weeks of empirical antimicrobial therapy

    Time frame: 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Duration of the therapy

    Number of days of empirical antimicrobial therapy is required to achieve clinical cure

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  2. Need for prolong antibiotics therapy

    Asymptomatic participants requiring persistent drainage or repeated aspiration of the abscess even after 2 weeks of empirical antimicrobial therapy to achieve clinical cure

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  3. Duration of hospital stay

    Number of days receiving in-hospital medical care

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  4. Readmission

    Participants requiring repeated admission with in-hospital medical care to achieve clinical

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  5. Recurrence of liver abscess

    Emergence of new liver abscess after achieving clinical cure during 8 weeks of follow up

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  6. Adverse drug reaction (ADR)

    Incidence of adverse drug reaction related to the ongoing antimicrobial therapy

    Time frame: 8 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Plans to share individual participant data (IPD) will considered with reasonable request to the principal investigator depending upon Institutional Ethic Committee approval.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Feb 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2026, 16 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 21, 2025
First posted
Feb 26, 2025
StartActual
Feb 25, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Jun 30, 2026
CompletionEst.
Jun 30, 2026
Last update
Apr 13, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 13, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06847126
Responsible party
Deba Prasad Dhibar (Associate Professor, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 26, 2025
Start date
Feb 25, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 13, 2025

Study contacts

Deba Prasad Dhibar, MD Medicine
Contact
drdeba_prasad@yahoo.co.in
+911722756670

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion