ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06839248Updated May 11, 2026

Effect of Fasting Recommendations Among Patients Using GLP-1 Receptor Agonists

An interventional study of 24-hour clear liquid diet and Standard fasting guidelines in Residual Gastric Contents and Pulmonary Aspiration of Gastric Contents, sponsored by St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne. Recruiting at 2 sites in Australia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-11.

Sponsored by St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2025; still recruiting 1 year 4 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
154
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this randomised controlled trial is to determine the effect of a 24-hour clear liquid diet compared to standard fasting guidelines on the proportion of participants who present with increased residual gastric contents during their study visit. It also aims to determine the effect of a 24-hour clear liquid diet compared to standard fasting guidelines on:

  • Solid content or thick fluids
  • Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including thirst, hunger, nausea, fatigue, and anxiety.
  • Compliance measures, including adherence with the intervention, time since last oral intake of solid foods, and time since last oral intake of clear liquids.

We will enrol adults who are currently using any once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) medication. Participants will be allocated in a 1:1 ratio to follow a 24-hour clear liquid diet or standard fasting guidelines prior to attending a study visit where participants will undergo a blinded gastric ultrasound assessment.

Read the detailed description

GLP-1 RAs have had a transformative impact on the management of obesity, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes. Despite this, this class of medications pose a significant challenge in the perioperative setting, as GLP-1 RAs are known to increase patients' risk of presenting to surgery with residual gastric contents even when standard fasting guidance is adhered to. Such residual contents pose a risk for devastating complications if they are aspirated during surgery. In procedures such as upper endoscopy, where clear visualisation of the gastric tract is essential, the presence of residual contents in the stomach may result in procedures being aborted, leading to patients being exposed to additional risks associated with having to repeat the procedure. Despite the urgent need for clear guidance based on reliable evidence, healthcare professionals are currently practicing in an almost complete absence of evidence regarding the management of GLP-1 RAs in the perioperative period.

Our trial aims to address the uncertainty around pre-procedure management of patients using GLP-1 RAs by evaluating whether a 24-hour clear liquid diet can reduce the likelihood of increased residual gastric contents in patients using once-weekly GLP-1 RA medications, compared to the standard fasting guidelines currently recommended before elective procedures. Standard fasting guidelines, as defined by the ASA and ANZCA, recommend clear liquids up to 2 hours before anaesthesia, a light or low calorific meal up to 6 hours before anaesthesia, and fasting from fried foods, fatty foods, or meat for at least 8 hours prior to anaesthesia.The trial will also examine the effect of this more stringent fasting guidance on outcomes including thirst, hunger, nausea, fatigue, and anxiety, which impact both comfort and satisfaction among patients undergoing surgery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Residual Gastric Contents
  • Pulmonary Aspiration of Gastric Contents
03

In context

Respiratory Aspiration of Gastric Contents

27 studies on the registry are indexed under Respiratory Aspiration of Gastric Contents; 6 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 154 is above the median of 101 across 16 interventional studies indexed under Respiratory Aspiration of Gastric Contents.

Browse Respiratory Aspiration of Gastric Contents studies →

Lead sponsor

St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne is the lead sponsor of 17 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18 years old at enrolment.
  • Have regularly administered any type of once-weekly GLP-1 RA medication for a period of at least one month prior to randomisation.
  • If allocated to follow standard fasting guidelines, willing to adhere to ASA and ANZCA preoperative fasting requirements. This requires participants to only consume clear liquids up to 2 hours, a light or low calorific meal up to 6 hours, and fasting from fried foods, fatty foods, or meat for at least 8 hours prior to the trial visit.
  • If allocated to follow a 24-hour clear liquid diet, willing to adhere to nothing-by-mouth (NPO) for solids and last intake of clear liquids no less than 2 hours prior to the trial visit.
  • Provide a signed and dated form for study participation in line with the requirements of the human research ethics committee (HREC) of the study site.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Participants meeting any of the following criteria, indicative of abnormal anatomy and not validated by gastric ultrasound, will be excluded from this trial:

  • Has a recent history of gastrointestinal bleed within the previous 1 month from enrolment.
  • Has a history of previous lower oesophageal or gastric surgery.
  • Has a known abnormal upper gastrointestinal anatomy, including hiatus hernia or gastric tumours.

In addition, participants meeting any the of following criteria will be excluded from this trial:

  • Participant reports having been previously diagnosed with a gastric emptying abnormality such as gastroparesis.
  • Participant reports concomitant use of insulin.
  • Unable to assume the right lateral decubitus position required for gastric ultrasound assessment.
  • Participant has difficulty fully understanding PICF or study materials due to a primary language other than English.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
154 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    24-hour clear liquid diet

    Other: 24-hour clear liquid diet

  • Active comparator
    Standard fasting guidelines

    Other: Standard fasting guidelines

Interventions

  • Other24-hour clear liquid diet

    Participants randomly assigned to this arm will be instructed to follow a 24-hour clear liquid diet, defined as NPO for solids and last intake of clear liquids no less than 2 hours prior to the trial visit.

  • OtherStandard fasting guidelines

    Participants randomly assigned to this arm will be instructed to follow the ASA and ANZCA standards for preoperative fasting prior to presenting for their trial visit. This requires participants to only consume clear liquids up to 2 hours, a light or low calorific meal up to 6 hours, and fasting from fried foods, fatty foods, or meat for at least 8 hours prior to the trial visit.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Residual gastric contents

    Difference in proportion of participants who present with increased residual gastric contents, defined as \>1.5mL/kg of clear fluids, thick fluids or solids, as assessed by gastric ultrasound using the clinical algorithm by Perlas and colleagues.

    Time frame: Immediately following fasting intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Solid content or thick fluids

    Difference in proportion of participants who present with solid content or thick fluids, assessed by gastric ultrasound using the clinical algorithm by Perlas and colleagues.

    Time frame: Immediately following fasting intervention

  2. Thirst

    Mean difference in thirst, assessed using the thirst distress and thirst intensity Visual Analogue Scales. Participants rate their level of thirst distress along a scale of 0-10cm, where 10cm represents "extreme distress" and the end closest to 0cm the represents "not distressed". Participants rate their level of thirst intensity along a scale of 0-10cm, where 10cm represents "intense thirst" and the end closest to 0cm the represents "not thirsty". The average of the thirst intensity and the thirst distress score is calculated.

    Time frame: Immediately following fasting intervention

  3. Hunger

    Mean difference in hunger, assessed using the Hunger and Satiety Visual Analogue Scale. Participants rate their level of hunger along a scale of 0-10cm, where 10cm represents "I have never been more hungry, and the end closest to 0cm the represents "I am not hungry at all".

    Time frame: Immediately following fasting intervention

  4. Nausea

    Mean difference in nausea, assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale. Participants rate their level of nausea along a scale of 0-10cm, where 10cm represents "worst imaginable nausea", and the end closest to 0cm the represents "no nausea".

    Time frame: Immediately following fasting intervention

  5. Fatigue

    Mean difference in fatigue, assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale. Participants rate their level of fatigue along a scale of 0-10cm, where 10cm represents "extreme fatigue", and the end closest to 0cm the represents "not fatigued at all".

    Time frame: Immediately following fasting intervention

  6. Anxiety

    Mean difference in anxiety, assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale for Anxiety (VAS-A). Participants rate their level of anxiety along a scale of 0-10cm, where 10cm represents "most anxious I can imagine, and the end closest to 0cm the represents "not at all anxious".

    Time frame: Immediately following fasting intervention

  7. Adherence to intervention

    Difference in proportion of participants who adhere to allocated intervention, assessed using a dedicated case report form.

    Time frame: Immediately following fasting intervention

  8. Time since last oral intake of solid foods

    Mean difference in time since last oral intake of solid foods, assessed using a dedicated case report form.

    Time frame: Immediately following fasting intervention

  9. Time since last oral intake of clear liquids

    Mean difference in time since last oral intake of clear liquids, assessed using a dedicated case report form.

    Time frame: Immediately following fasting intervention

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Practice Guidelines for Preoperative Fasting and the Use of Pharmacologic Agents to Reduce the Risk of Pulmonary Aspiration: Application to Healthy Patients Undergoing Elective Procedures: An Updated Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Preoperative Fasting and the Use of Pharmacologic Agents to Reduce the Risk of Pulmonary Aspiration. Anesthesiology. 2017 Mar;126(3):376-393. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001452. No abstract available. PubMed 28045707 ↗
  • Joshi GP, Abdelmalak BB, Weigel WA, Harbell MW, Kuo CI, Soriano SG, Stricker PA, Tipton T, Grant MD, Marbella AM, Agarkar M, Blanck JF, Domino KB. 2023 American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice Guidelines for Preoperative Fasting: Carbohydrate-containing Clear Liquids with or without Protein, Chewing Gum, and Pediatric Fasting Duration-A Modular Update of the 2017 American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice Guidelines for Preoperative Fasting. Anesthesiology. 2023 Feb 1;138(2):132-151. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004381. PubMed 36629465 ↗
  • Perlas A, Van de Putte P, Van Houwe P, Chan VW. I-AIM framework for point-of-care gastric ultrasound. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Jan;116(1):7-11. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev113. Epub 2015 May 7. No abstract available. PubMed 25951832 ↗
  • Carey S, Waller J, Wang LY, Ferrie S. Qualifying thirst distress in the acute hospital setting-validation of a patient-reported outcome measure. Journal of Perioperative Nursing.2021;34(4):e38-e44.
  • Flint A, Raben A, Blundell JE, Astrup A. Reproducibility, power and validity of visual analogue scales in assessment of appetite sensations in single test meal studies. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000 Jan;24(1):38-48. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801083. PubMed 10702749 ↗
  • Boogaerts JG, Vanacker E, Seidel L, Albert A, Bardiau FM. Assessment of postoperative nausea using a visual analogue scale. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2000 Apr;44(4):470-4. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2000.440420.x. PubMed 10757584 ↗
  • Glaus A. Assessment of fatigue in cancer and non-cancer patients and in healthy individuals. Support Care Cancer. 1993 Nov;1(6):305-15. doi: 10.1007/BF00364968. PubMed 8156248 ↗
  • Desrame J, Baize N, Anota A, Laribi K, Stefani L, Hjiej S, Nabirotchkina E, Zelek L, Choquet S. Fatigue visual analogue scale score correlates with quality of life in cancer patients receiving epoetin alfa (Sandoz) for chemotherapy-induced anaemia: The CIROCO study. Cancer Treat Res Commun. 2023;37:100781. doi: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2023.100781. Epub 2023 Nov 23. PubMed 38039763 ↗
  • Hornblow AR, Kidson MA. The visual analogue scale for anxiety: a validation study. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1976 Dec;10(4):339-41. doi: 10.3109/00048677609159523. No abstract available. PubMed 1071419 ↗
  • Facco E, Stellini E, Bacci C, Manani G, Pavan C, Cavallin F, Zanette G. Validation of visual analogue scale for anxiety (VAS-A) in preanesthesia evaluation. Minerva Anestesiol. 2013 Dec;79(12):1389-95. Epub 2013 Jul 9. PubMed 23860442 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The following will be made available long-term for use, by request, from future researchers from a recognised research institution whose proposed use of the data has been ethically reviewed, approved by an independent committee, and can demonstrate a safe data management plan.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Analytic code

Time frame: Upon request

Access criteria: By request, from future researchers from a recognised research institution whose proposed use of the data has been ethically reviewed, approved by an independent committee, and can demonstrate a safe data management plan.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Jun 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Feb 2027, 19 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 11, 2025
First posted
Feb 21, 2025
StartActual
Jun 20, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Feb 1, 2027
CompletionEst.
Feb 1, 2027
Last update
May 11, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 11, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06839248
Lead sponsor
St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne
Responsible party
Prof. Michelle Dowsey (Head Arthritis Research, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 21, 2025
Start date
Jun 20, 2025
Primary completion
Feb 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
May 11, 2026

Study contacts

Prof Michelle Dowsey, BHealthSci(Nursing), MEpi, PhD
Contact
mmdowsey@unimelb.edu.au
03 9231 3955 ext. 61
Prof Michelle Dowsey, BHealthSci(Nursing), MEpi, PhD
principal investigator · St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion