CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT06838481EOECORT-COM-JPUpdated Feb 20, 2025

Effects of Overload Eccentric and Concentric Resistance Training on the Cost of Walking, Muscle-tendon and Jumping Performance in Healthy Older Individuals

An interventional study of Concentric overload resistance training and Eccentric overload resistance training in Healthy Older Adults, sponsored by Hungarian University of Sports Science. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Hungary. Open to participants aged 60 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-20.

Sponsored by Hungarian University of Sports Science · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 9 months ago, but the record still lists the study as active, not recruiting.
  • Registered 8 months after the study started (first participant enrolled May 2024, registered Feb 2025).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
60 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Normal aging leads to a decline in neuromuscular and mobility functions, including a 60% reduction in maximal voluntary force production, a 25% decrease in muscle volume and quality (sarcopenia), and reduced tendon stiffness by age 70. These changes impair walking speed, balance, and increase the metabolic cost of walking by \~20% in older adults compared to younger individuals. While walking training can reduce metabolic costs, no interventions have successfully addressed the 20% age-related difference. Resistance training, particularly eccentric (muscle-lengthening) training, shows promise for improving muscle strength and mass, but its effects on functional, cognitive abilities, and walking economy in older adults remain unexplored.

Read the detailed description

Normal aging is characterized by a decline in neuromuscular and mobility functions. By the age of 70, maximal voluntary force production decreases by approximately 60%, accompanied by a \~25% reduction in muscle volume and quality, leading to sarcopenia. Alongside changes in muscle protein content, composition, and mitochondrial biochemistry, aging also affects tendon properties. While healthy aging does not significantly alter tendon size, it reduces tendon stiffness, which can delay force transmission. These changes in muscle-tendon function contribute to slower walking speeds and impaired static and dynamic balance.

One of the most significant functional changes with aging is the increased metabolic cost of walking. Older individuals require \~20% more metabolic energy to walk the same distance as younger adults, yet the underlying reasons remain unclear. While walking training has been shown to reduce metabolic costs in older adults, no studies have attempted to reduce this 20% age-related difference using alternative interventions.

Resistance training induces adaptations in muscle-tendon function by requiring participants to overcome external loads. Traditional resistance training combines concentric (muscle shortening) and eccentric (muscle lengthening) contractions, but eccentric training has received increasing attention due to its superior benefits in muscle strength and mass improvement. However, no studies have examined how resistance training, particularly with an eccentric focus, impacts functional and cognitive abilities or walking economy in older adults.

Objectives:

This study aims to:

  1. Investigate the effects of resistance training, particularly eccentric-focused training, on muscle-tendon function and walking economy in older adults.
  2. Examine whether these changes translate into improved neuromuscular and cognitive functions.
  3. Determine if improved tendon stiffness leads to more efficient force transmission, reducing walking energy expenditure.
02

Conditions studied

  • Healthy Older Adults

Keywords

  • Resistance training
  • cost of walking
  • cost of transfer
  • balance
  • countermovement jump
  • SSC
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Hungarian University of Sports Science is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
60 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

    • Healthy men and women aged 60+ (intervention study).

      • No significant cognitive or cardiovascular impairments.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

    • Acute injuries or history of severe tendon injuries (Achilles or patellar tendon rupture).

      • Tendinopathy or chronic musculoskeletal disorders.
      • Hypertension, unless controlled with medication.
      • Neurological or psychiatric disorders (dementia, mild cognitive impairment).
      • Metabolic diseases affecting muscle/tendon function,
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Concentric overload resistance training

    Receive Concentric overload resistance training

    Other: Concentric overload resistance training

  • Experimental
    Eccentric overload resistance training

    Receive Eccentric overload resistance training

    Other: Eccentric overload resistance training

  • Placebo comparator
    Active control group

    walking intervention

    Other: Active Control

Interventions

  • OtherConcentric overload resistance training

    * Resistance training groups will train 2-3 times per week for 3 months using specialized TechnoGym machines. * Exercises include Concentric leg press, knee extension, and ankle plantarflexion in a progressive loading program following American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) \& National Strength and Conditioning Association (NSCA) guidelines. * Heart rate, blood pressure, and perceived exertion will be monitored during each session.

    Also known as: active control

  • OtherEccentric overload resistance training

    * Resistance training groups will train 2-3 times per week for 3 months using specialized TechnoGym machines. * Exercises include Eccentric leg press, knee extension, and ankle plantarflexion in a progressive loading program following American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) \& National Strength and Conditioning Association (NSCA) guidelines. * Heart rate, blood pressure, and perceived exertion will be monitored during each session.

  • OtherActive Control

    Walking

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Walking metabolic cost

    Assessed using spirometry at different speeds (J/kg/m)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1.5 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Maximum isometric voluntary contraction

    Maximum isometric voluntary force using a dynamometer. (Nm)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1.5 year

  2. Patella and Achilles tendon stiffness

    Stiffness is the slope of the force elongation curve using dynamometer combining with Ultrasound (N/mm)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1.5 year

  3. Vastus lateralis and Gastrocnemius muscle thickness & tendon thickness

    VL, GC, and Achilles tendon \& patellar tendon will be assessed using Ultrasound images (mm)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1.5 year

  4. Whole leg muscle mass

    Whole leg muscle mass via DEXA scan.(Kg)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1.5 year

  5. Jump efficiency

    squat jump and Countermovement jump height (cm) jump efficiency (%)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1.5 year

  6. Cognitive Assessments

    Cognitive tests: Executive function, working memory, and processing speed using some questionnaires with score values. Reaction Time (milliseconds, ms) Score (points or errors) - Based on correct/incorrect responses in tasks Number of correct responses per second (responses/sec)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1.5 year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hungarian University of Sports Science, Budapest, Hungary
    Budapest XII., Budapest 1037, Hungary
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Malatesta D, Canepa M, Menendez Fernandez A. The effect of treadmill and overground walking on preferred walking speed and gait kinematics in healthy, physically active older adults. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2017 Sep;117(9):1833-1843. doi: 10.1007/s00421-017-3672-3. Epub 2017 Jul 7. PubMed 28687953 ↗
  • Thomas EE, De Vito G, Macaluso A. Speed training with body weight unloading improves walking energy cost and maximal speed in 75- to 85-year-old healthy women. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2007 Nov;103(5):1598-603. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00399.2007. Epub 2007 Sep 6. PubMed 17823302 ↗
  • Valenti G, Bonomi AG, Westerterp KR. Multicomponent Fitness Training Improves Walking Economy in Older Adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 Jul;48(7):1365-70. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000893. PubMed 26848888 ↗
  • Hunter GR, Fisher G, Neumeier WH, Carter SJ, Plaisance EP. Exercise Training and Energy Expenditure following Weight Loss. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015 Sep;47(9):1950-7. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000622. PubMed 25606816 ↗
  • Hunter GR, McCarthy JP, Bryan DR, Zuckerman PA, Bamman MM, Byrne NM. Increased strength and decreased flexibility are related to reduced oxygen cost of walking. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2008 Nov;104(5):895-901. doi: 10.1007/s00421-008-0846-z. Epub 2008 Aug 29. PubMed 18758805 ↗
  • Godges JJ, MacRae PG, Engelke KA. Effects of exercise on hip range of motion, trunk muscle performance, and gait economy. Phys Ther. 1993 Jul;73(7):468-77. doi: 10.1093/ptj/73.7.468. PubMed 8316580 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr, Analytic code

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 20, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06838481
Lead sponsor
Hungarian University of Sports Science
Collaborators
Semmelweis University
Responsible party
Mohamed Abdelaziz Emam (PhD Student Semmelweis University, Hungarian University of Sports Science) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 20, 2025
Start date
May 15, 2024
Primary completion
Dec 15, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
May 15, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 20, 2025

Study contacts

Prof. DR. Tibor Hortobágyi Hortobágyi
principal investigator · Hungarian University of Sports Science, Department of Kinesioogy, Budapest, Hungary

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion