An interventional study of Consultation Model of large language model in Ophthalmology Clinics in Non-emergency Ocular Diseases, sponsored by Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University. Completed at 1 site in China. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-08.
Sponsored by Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Screening
The intelligent image models lack an understanding of diagnostic and treatment logic, and have not considered textual information such as symptoms and signs. Large language models like ChatGPT, can learn medical knowledge, understand, and generate human natural language, offering new technologies for medical knowledge-based intelligent question answering and the creation of smart medical documents. Therefore, our team plan to verify large language models' feasibility and effectiveness in ophthalmology clinics for medical history collection and examination recommendations during consultations, comparing its performance with traditional methods.
Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University is the lead sponsor of 159 studies on the registry; 77 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
After the patient signs the informed consent form, the large language model completes the medical history collection and recommends examinations.
Other: Consultation Model of large language model in Ophthalmology Clinics
After the patient signs the informed consent form, doctor completes the medical history collection and recommends examinations.
Large language model completes the medical history collection and recommends examinations.
Medical History Collection Scoring
The medical history collection is performed using the standard outpatient medical record form. The scoring criteria are developed collaboratively by clinical doctors from multiple specialties and researchers. Scoring is independently conducted in a blinded manner by higher-level specialists.
Time frame: through study completion, up to 1 week.
Accuracy of Recommended Tests
The gold standard for both the experimental and control groups consists of test items independently selected by senior specialists, who are not involved in the study.
Time frame: through study completion, up to 1 week.
Duration of Medical History Collection
The experimental group uses the developed system to record the consultation and medical record writing completion times, while the control group records the consultation time through audio recording and the medical record writing completion time through the developed system.
Time frame: through study completion, up to 1 week.
Patient satisfaction
Collected through a questionnaire.
Time frame: through study completion, up to 1 week.
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University