CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06823882Updated Feb 12, 2025

Practicing Getting Up from the Floor to Reduce Fear of Falling and Improve Floor-Rise Ability in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: a Pilot Study

An interventional study of Floor-Rise Training and Video Demonstration in Fear of Falling, Floor-Rise Ability and Falls, sponsored by Glasgow Caledonian University. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-12.

Sponsored by Glasgow Caledonian University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2024, registered Feb 2025).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
61
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Goal:

This pilot study aims to determine whether practicing getting down to and standing up from the floor reduces fear of falling (FoF) and improves older adults' ability to complete this task. The study compares this to a control group that watches educational videos on the same topic. This practice is referred to as Floor-Rise Training (FRT).

Main Questions:

  1. Can a short FRT intervention reduce fear of falling?
  2. Can a short FRT intervention improve the ability to rise from kneeling, sitting, and lying positions?
  3. Does watching an instructional video on FRT improve fear of falling or floor-rise ability?

Study Design:

Researchers will compare:

  • A group receiving 20 minutes of FRT weekly for 5 weeks.
  • A control group watching FRT videos followed by discussions over the same period. Changes in floor-rise ability and FoF will be assessed to determine the effectiveness of FRT.

Participants:

Participants will be recruited from five Otago exercise classes (a falls prevention program without FRT) in Renfrewshire. Each class will be randomly assigned to either:

  • The FRT intervention group (3 classes).
  • The control group (2 classes) watching videos that include an FRT demonstration. Participants will complete questionnaires (to assess FoF) and timed floor-rise tests before and after the intervention. Some may also be invited to focus groups to share their experiences with the intervention, videos and with our recruitment procedures.
02

Conditions studied

  • Fear of Falling
  • Floor-Rise Ability
  • Falls
  • Post-Fall Recovery
  • Older Adults (65 Years and Older)
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Glasgow Caledonian University is the lead sponsor of 45 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 65 or older
  • Able to provide written informed consent
  • Currently engaged with ROAR and attending the Otago exercise classes

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Requiring a walking frame indoors to mobilise
  • Have any medical condition that renders it inadvisable to descend to the floor (e.g. such as awaiting knee replacement surgery)
  • Any uncontrolled medical condition requiring medical input
  • BM I≥ 30 kg/m2
  • Lacking capacity to consent to participate
  • Unable to comprehend FRT instructions
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
61 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Floor-Rise Training Group

    Participants practiced getting up from the floor using a structured approach called the Backward Chaining Method (BCM). Sessions lasted 20 minutes weekly for 5 weeks, led by an instructor.

    Behavioral: Floor-Rise Training

  • Active comparator
    Video Demonstration Group

    Participants watched a 20-minute instructional video called "Upwards and Onwards", available on the NHS Inform website. The video explains how to get up from the floor safely and how to practice. It was divided into shorter sections over 5 weeks, with group discussions ensuring a total of 20 minutes per week.

    Behavioral: Video Demonstration

Interventions

  • BehavioralFloor-Rise Training

    Practicing getting up from the floor using the Backward Chaining Method (BCM) for 20 minutes per week for 5 weeks

    Also known as: Backward Chaining Method

  • BehavioralVideo Demonstration

    Watching a 20-min video on floor-rise technique and over 5 weeks, with discussions. This video explains how to get up safely from the floor and how to practice.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I)

    A 16-item questionnaire that assesses concern about falling during daily activities. Scores range from 16 (no concern) to 64 (severe concern). A lower score indicates a lower fear of falling.

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 week following the intervention (6 weeks post-baseline).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Timed Floor-Rise (Supine to Standing)

    Time taken (in seconds) for a participant to rise independently from a supine position (lying on their back) to a standing position using a sturdy chair. Faster time indicates improved ability.

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 week following the intervention (6 weeks post-baseline).

  2. Timed Floor-Rise (Sitting to Standing)

    Time taken (in seconds) for a participant to rise from a sitting position on the floor to standing using a sturdy chair. Faster time indicates improved ability.

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 week following the intervention (6 weeks post-baseline).

  3. Timed Floor-Rise (Kneeling to Standing)

    Time taken (in seconds) for a participant to rise from a kneeling position to standing using a sturdy chair. Faster time indicates improved ability.

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 week following the intervention (6 weeks post-baseline).

  4. Perceived Ability to Manage Falls (PAMF)

    The PAMF is a 5-item questionnaire measuring confidence in independently recovering from a fall. Scores range from 4 to 20, with higher scores indicating greater confidence.

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 week following the intervention (6 weeks post-baseline).

  5. Fear of Falling Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Indoor

    Participants mark with an "x" on a 0-100 scale measuring fear of falling indoors, with higher scores indicating greater fear.

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 week following the intervention (6 weeks post-baseline).

  6. Fear of Falling Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Outdoor

    Participants mark with an "x" on a 0-100 scale measuring fear of falling outdoors, with higher scores indicating greater fear.

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 week following the intervention (6 weeks post-baseline).

  7. Activity Avoidance (VAS)

    Participants mark with an "x" on a 0-100 scale measuring the percentage of activities avoided due to fear of falling, with higher scores indicating greater avoidance.

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 week following the intervention (6 weeks post-baseline).

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Glasgow Caledonian University
    Glasgow, Scotland G4 0BA, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified participant-level data for primary and secondary outcome measures

Supporting information: Study protocol

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 12, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06823882
Lead sponsor
Glasgow Caledonian University
Responsible party
Shane Seeley (Doctor of Physiotherapy (DPT) Student, Glasgow Caledonian University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 12, 2025
Start date
Jan 15, 2024
Primary completion
Mar 1, 2024
Completion
Mar 19, 2024
Last update
Feb 12, 2025

Study contacts

Dawn A Skelton, PhD
study director · Glasgow Caledonian University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion