ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06820541Updated Feb 11, 2025

Gallbladder Stenting in FC-SEMS

An interventional study of Double plastic pigtail stent plus fully covered self-expandable metal stent and Fully covered self-expandable metal stent in Biliary Obstruction and Acute Cholecystitis, sponsored by Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-11.

Sponsored by Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Apr 2026, 7 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to determine whether primary prophylaxis with transpapillary gallbladder drainage prevents acute cholecystitis after fully-covered self-expandable metal stents placement during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for malignant distal biliary obstruction in patients at higher risk of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography acute cholecystitis.

The main question it aims to answer is:

Does prophylactic transpapillary gallbladder drainage reduce the rate of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography acute cholecystitis in high-risk patients? Researchers will compare patients who undergo transpapillary gallbladder drainage to patients without transpapillary gallbladder drainage to see if transpapillary gallbladder drainage reduces the rate of acute cholecystitis.

Participants will:

  1. receive or not transpapillary gallbladder drainage before fully-covered self-expandable metal stents placement
  2. will be followed up at one, three, and six months to ascertain the onset of acute cholecystitis
02

Conditions studied

  • Biliary Obstruction
  • Acute Cholecystitis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Cholecystitis, Acute

140 studies on the registry are indexed under Cholecystitis, Acute; 30 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 80 is below the median of 90 across 84 interventional studies indexed under Cholecystitis, Acute.

Browse Cholecystitis, Acute studies →

Lead sponsor

Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona is the lead sponsor of 95 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients
  • Signed
  • Patients requiring covered metal stent placement for managing MBO
  • High-risk of post-endoscopic cholangiopancreatography acute cholecystitis according to the following criteria:
  • tumor involvement of the cystic duct orifice confirmed on magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, endoscopic ultrasound, or at endoscopic cholangiopancreatography;
  • presence of at least 2 of the following:

    1. gallbladder stones;
    2. CBD diameter ≤ 10 mm;
    3. intraprocedural gallbladder opacification;
    4. cystic duct orifice at risk of being covered by the fully-covered stent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of cholecystectomy
  • Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography not feasible for duodenal stenosis or failed biliary cannulation
  • Patients with previous gallbladder drainage
  • Acute cholecystitis is already present based on the Tokyo guidelines
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Transpapillary stenting

    Patients will undergo prophylactic transpapillary gallbladder drainage followed by fully-covered self-expandable metal stent placement for biliary drainage

    Device: Double plastic pigtail stent plus fully covered self-expandable metal stent

  • Active comparator
    Standard biliary drainage

    Patients will undergo fully-covered self-expandable metal stent placement for biliary drainage

    Device: Fully covered self-expandable metal stent

Interventions

  • DeviceDouble plastic pigtail stent plus fully covered self-expandable metal stent

    After contrast injection, the cystic duct orifice will be detected. Using a sphincterotome, a 0.035-inch hydrophilic angled guidewire will be negotiated into the gallbladder. Dilation of the cystic duct will be performed using standard devices designed for biliary intervention, including pneumatic dilators or dilation progressive catheters. After dilation, a 7Fr plastic, double pigtail stent, length of 12 or 15 cm, will be deployed across the papilla. Finally, a fully-covered self-expandable metal stent will be placed alongside the gallbladder drainage for biliary drainage.

  • DeviceFully covered self-expandable metal stent

    After biliary cannulation, a fully covered self-expandable metal stent will be placed for biliary drainage

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Acute cholecystitis

    The rate of acute cholecystitis, defined according to the Tokyo guideline, will be calculated and compared between the two groups

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall adverse events

    The overall adverse events rate will be calculated and compared between the two groups

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Hospitalization

    The duration of the hospitalization will be calculated and

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Disease-free survival

    Acute cholecystitis free-survival rate, calculated as days from endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography to acute cholecystitis or end of follow-up, cholecystectomy, or death, will be calculated and compared between the two groups

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Technical success

    The rate of transpapillary gallbladder drainage, defined as the percentage of complete placement of the stent, will be calculated

    Time frame: 1 mont

  5. Procedure time

    The time of the procedure, calculates ad minutes starting after randomization to the end of the procedure, will be calculated and compared between the teo groups

    Time frame: 1 month

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Mar 2025; primary completion for Apr 2026, 13 months later.

Of 42 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Cholecystitis, Acute, half reached primary completion within 18 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 24. This study's planned 13 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 45 studies reached it within 20 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 27.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 6, 2025
First posted
Feb 11, 2025
StartEst.
Mar 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Apr 1, 2026
CompletionEst.
Oct 1, 2026
Last update
Feb 11, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 11, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06820541
Lead sponsor
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 11, 2025
Start date
Mar 1, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Apr 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 11, 2025

Study contacts

Stefano Francesco Crinò, MD, PhD
Contact
stefanofrancesco.crino@aovr.veneto.it
00390458126191

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion