CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06819761Updated Jun 16, 2026Results posted

Determining the Viability a Lozenge Dosage for Probiotics

An interventional study of Salivarius SALI-10 in Delivery Systems and Oral Health, sponsored by Ostia Sciences. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-16.

Sponsored by Ostia Sciences · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
8
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Gingivitis is an oral disease condition affecting 50% to 90% of adults globally. Gingivitis is a reversible inflammatory condition caused by the accumulation of dental plaque and the associated disruption of the host-microbial homeostasis. During gingivitis, the microbial community shifts from gram-positive health-associated bacteria, to gram-negative disease associated species. This shift triggers inflammatory responses, leading to tissue damage and, in some cases, progression to periodontitis.

A promising area of oral health is treating the oral cavity with gram-positive probiotics to improve oral health. One promising candidate is S. salivarius SALI-10. Typically oral probiotics are dosed to the oral cavity using lozenges. This study is a pre-clinical Phase 0 trial to determine is a lozenge is a viable dosage form for the delivery of salivarius SALI-10 oral probiotics.

Read the detailed description

Gingivitis is an oral disease condition affecting 50% to 90% of adults globally. The gingivitis pathology can be reversed by reduction or removal of microbial plaque that accumulates on hard and soft tissues and is considered standard of care in the industry. Regular oral hygiene in combination with therapeutics that delivers an anti-microbial benefit is thought to mitigate the onset of gingivitis. However, testing therapeutics for prophylaxis benefit to mitigate development of gingivitis has not been fully examined.

Neutrophils, a type of white blood cell (leukocyte), represent a key component of the innate defence system that protects periodontal tissue from both gingivitis and periodontitis. Not only are they the first line of cellular defence, but they are among the most abundant leukocytes within the periodontal tissues. For example, gingivitis is associated with a significant increase in the number of neutrophils that migrate to periodontal tissue. In contrast, individuals with too few neutrophils brought about by either congenital deficiencies in neutrophil numbers, or transit (LAD 1 and 2) or have an induced neutropenia by chemical induction with antimitotic agents such as cyclophosamide invariably develop periodontitis. Likewise, studies in KO mice that are defective in neutrophil transit also develop periodontitis. Consistent with the key contribution of neutrophils to both gingivitis and periodontitis, neutrophil transit to gingival tissue is highly regulated. The periodontium contains a highly orchestrated expression of select innate host defense mediators that facilitate the transit of neutrophils from the highly vascularized gingival tissue to the gingival crevice, where they form a "wall" between the host tissue and the dental plaque biofilm.

Gingivitis is a reversible inflammatory condition caused by the accumulation of dental plaque and the associated disruption of the host-microbial homeostasis. During gingivitis, the microbial community transitions from being dominated by gram-positive health-associated bacteria, such as Streptococcus species, to gram-negative periopathogens, including species of the genera Porphyromonas, Tannerella, Treponema and Prevotella. This dysbiotic shift triggers inflammatory responses, leading to tissue damage and, in some cases, progression to periodontitis.

A recent study on human experimental gingivitis identified three distinct host response phenotypes-high, low, and slow responders-based on clinical, inflammatory, and microbial parameters:

High Responders: Rapid plaque accumulation accompanied by a significant increase in gram-negative periopathogens and elevated inflammatory markers, such as interleukin-1β (IL-1β).

Low Responders: Similar plaque accumulation to high responders but lower inflammation, suggesting a more muted host response to bacterial dysbiosis.

Slow Responders: Delayed plaque accumulation and microbial succession, with prolonged dominance of health-associated Streptococcus species. This group exhibited delayed or reduced inflammation, demonstrating a more resilient microbial community and host response.

The microbial analysis revealed that the persistence of beneficial Streptococcus species, such as S. sanguinis and S. oralis, in slow and low responders correlates with a protective effect against the emergence of periopathogens and the associated inflammatory cascade. Conversely, the loss of these beneficial bacteria in high responders was linked to more severe inflammation, highlighting the critical role of the oral microbiome in modulating gingivitis severity.

Lantibiotic salivaricins are polycyclic peptides containing lanthionine and/or β-methyllanthionine residues that are produced by certain strains of Streptococcus salivarius, which almost exclusively reside in the human oral cavity. These molecules' importance stems from their antimicrobial activity towards relevant oral pathogens, which has been applied through the development of salivaricin-producing probiotic strains. However, salivaricins may also prove to be of great value in the development of new and novel antibacterial therapies in this era of emerging antibiotic resistance. In a study by Barbour \& Philip 2014, they found that the bacteriocin, levan-sucrase production, and basic safety features of S. salivarius strains isolated from healthy Malaysian subjects demonstrated their potential for use as probiotics. A new bacteriocin production medium was developed with potential scale-up application for pharmaceuticals and probiotics from S. salivarius generating different lantibiotics. This is relevant for the clinical management of the oral cavity and upper respiratory tract in the human population. Appendix 1 includes a summary table that lists the relevant clinical trials that utilized S. salivarius.

Proposed Solution: S. salivarius SALI-10

It is proposed to use a novel strain, Streptococcus salivarius SALI-10, as a targeted microbial intervention to modulate the oral microbiome and prevent gingivitis. S. salivarius SALI-10 is hypothesized to:

  • Maintain a stable population of beneficial streptococci during plaque accumulation.
  • Inhibit the growth of periopathogens such as Porphyromonas, Tannerella, and Prevotella through competition and production of Salivaricin 10.
  • Delay or suppress the dysbiotic shift to gram-negative dominance, thereby reducing the inflammatory response.

By preserving microbial homeostasis, SALI-10 may emulate the microbial resilience observed in slow responders, offering a novel strategy for gingivitis prevention.

Before the therapeutic value of Streptococcus salivarius SALI-10 can be assessed, its dosage form must be validated. The classical method of delivering oral probiotics is in a lozenge form, having the individual suck on the lozenge until it dissolves. Once it is verified that this dosage form works for Streptococcus salivarius SALI-10, a full clinical trial to determine its therapeutic viability can be conducted.

2. STUDY OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to determine the short-term ability of the Streptococcus salivarius SALI-10 lozenges delivery system to modify the human oral microbiome composition and Oral Inflammatory Load (OIL). Specifically, the aim is to:

  • Assess the change in salivary levels of periodontal-disease-associated bacteria (e.g., P. gingivalis, T. forsythia, T. denticola, and P. micra).
  • Determine the change in beneficial bacteria levels (e.g., S. salivarius, S. parasanguinis).
  • Evaluate the change in Oral Inflammatory Load (OIL) by measuring oral neutrophil counts.

To monitor the short-term adherence of the 8-10 participants to the clinical protocol.

3. STUDY OVERVIEW

This study is designed as an open-label, single-arm, exploratory pilot study to be completed over 7 days with 8-10 participants. Participants will self-administer one lozenge containing S. salivarius SALI-10 (10 billion CFU/lozenge) each night after brushing and before bed. Participants will complete two (2) home sample kits, one before and one after the 7 days.

5. TEST PRODUCTS/INTERVENTIONS Each participant will receive seven (7) mint-flavoured SALI-10 lozenges. They will be instructed to take a lozenge daily after brushing by letting it dissolve in the mouth. The participants will be using the SALI-10 lozenges throughout the study. Each participant will also receive four (4) home-administered test kits: two (2) Saliva Collection Kits, and two (2) Saline Rinse Collection Kits.

5.2 Dispensing, Storage, and Accountability Once pre-screened, all participants will receive all study materials in the mail. This will include the seven (7) lozenges and the four (4) home-administered test kits: two (2) Saliva Collection Kits, and two (2) Saline Rinse Collection Kits. The subjects will follow provided instructions on when and how to brush their teeth. These instructions are explained in the procedure section.

The test kits are self-contained commercially available kits that include all instructions of use. Participants will be provided instructions on how to drop off the samples to Ostia Sciences Inc at 124 Edward St., Toronto, Suite 463, ON Canada M5G 1G6.

Participants will be instructed to discard all study materials at the end of the 7-day trial.

6. STUDY PROCEDURES

6.2 Product Dispensing and Use at Home The product will be mailed to the participant in a sealed box that will include instructions for at-home use and safety information, including emergency contact details. To monitor patient compliance, the clinical study manager will request an email confirmation at the end of the trial that all 7 lozenges were consumed. Subjects will be assigned a unique identification number in chronological order (e.g., from 1 to 10) as they enroll in the study. Subjects will be instructed to avoid using any other oral hygiene products. There will be no dietary restrictions during the study.

Subjects will be instructed to brush their teeth twice daily (morning and evening) for two minutes each time with a toothpaste and toothbrush and floss. The SALI-10 lozenges will be pre-packed when given to each participant.

6.3 Telephone Pre-Screening Potential study participants who contact the clinical trial coordinator for more information about the study via email will then be contacted via telephone. At this stage, the Recruitment Questionnaire will be completed to determine whether they are eligible for the screening phase of the study. If the subject is deemed eligible, they will be given the Informed Consent Form to read and ask any questions they may have and sign. The screening will be carried out until ten (10) subjects are enrolled.

There will be no in-person visits. Study participants will be mailed all study materials, which included the seven (7) lozenges, and the four (4) home-administered test kits: two (2) Saliva Collection Kits, and two (2) Saline Rinse Collection Kits. Subjects will also receive the study product for use at home with directions.

6.5 Day 0 (Baseline) Participants will utilize one (1) Saliva Collection Kit, and one (1) Saline Rinse Collection Kit. They will drop off the samples to Ostia Sciences as per the given instructions. After sample collection, participants will begin using the lozenges daily for 7 days. The participants will take one lozenge after brushing. They will allow the lozenges to dissolve without biting or swallowing and avoid eating and drinking for one hour. The participants will be instructed on proper oral hygiene and will be instructed to continue their home oral hygiene in addition to the use of their assigned product for 7 days (1 week). The participants will be instructed to discard the lozenges' container at the end of the study.

6.6 Day 7 (Completion) 24 hours after using the seventh (7th) lozenge, participants will utilize one (1) Saliva Collection Kit, and one (1) Saline Rinse Collection Kit. They will drop off the samples to Ostia Sciences as per the given instructions. Study participants will discard any remaining study materials they may have. Through email, the study manager will confirm adherence to protocol and provide post-study instructions. The subjects will be informed that this is the end of the study. They will be told that they may resume their regular oral hygiene. Afterwards, the investigators will ask the participants for their feedback in regards to their experience.

02

Conditions studied

  • Delivery Systems
  • Oral Health

Keywords

  • Probiotics
  • Oral cavity
  • Lozenge
  • Dosage Forms
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Ostia Sciences is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  1. Male or female volunteers aged 18-70 years
  2. In good general health, ASA I
  3. Non-smokers
  4. Fluent in English

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Presence of orthodontic bands.
  2. Presence of partial removal dentures.
  3. Dental pain at time of screening.
  4. History of allergy to a consumer or personal care products or dentifrice ingredients as determined by the dental profession monitoring the study.
  5. Participation in any other clinical study or test panel within one month before entering the study.
  6. Current use of anti-inflammatory, antibiotics, or antimicrobial drugs or within the last 30 days of enrolment.
  7. History of periodontal disease.
  8. History of systemic inflammatory or immune conditions
  9. Pregnant or nursing women.
  10. Use of tobacco products.
  11. Long-term antibiotic or anti-inflammatory therapy.
  12. Medical condition or any current usage of medication that the investigator considers may compromise the subject's safety as well as the quality of the study results;
  13. Use of any concomitant medication.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
8 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Receives Probiotic Lozenge

    This study is an open-label, single-arm, exploratory pilot study to be completed over 7 days with 8-10 participants. Participants will self-administer one lozenge containing S. salivarius SALI-10 (10 billion CFU/lozenge) each night after brushing and before bed. Every participant will be given 7 SALI-10 lozenges. 1. The aim of this study is to determine the short-term ability of the Streptococcus salivarius SALI-10 lozenges delivery system to modify the human oral microbiome composition and Oral Inflammatory Load (OIL). Specifically, the investigators aim to: * Assess the change in salivary levels of periodontal-disease-associated bacteria (e.g., P. gingivalis, T. forsythia, T. denticola, and P. micra). * Determine the change in beneficial bacteria levels (e.g., S. salivarius, S. parasanguinis). * Evaluate the change in Oral Inflammatory Load (OIL) by measuring oral neutrophil counts. 2. To monitor the short-term adherence of the 8-10 participants to the clinical protocol.

    Dietary Supplement: Salivarius SALI-10

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementSalivarius SALI-10

    Lozenges containing live Streptococcus salivarius strain OSTIA SALI-10

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Oral Inflammatory Load (OIL)

    Oral inflammatory load (OIL) is measured via oral neutrophil count in oral rinse samples (oPMN). Post-transplantation values (Day 7) are normalized to each participant's baseline (Day 0) value to evaluate the change in OIL. For normalization, each participant's baseline OIL was set to 1 by dividing the baseline neutrophil count by itself. Post-transplantation OIL values were then divided by the participants baseline to calculate fold change.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 0) and day 7

  2. Change in SALI-10 Colonization Levels

    Quantification of SALI-10 colonization using qPCR targeting the srnA2 gene. Samples were collected at baseline (Day 0) and post-transplantation (Day 7). The srnA2 gene encodes for phosphorylated lantibiotic synthesized by S.salivarius SALI-10

    Time frame: Baseline (day 0) and day 7

  3. Changes in the Relative Abundance of P. Gingivalis

    Evaluation of pathogen suppression by quantifying the relative gene abundance of periodontal-disease-associated taxa (e.x. P. gingivalis, T. forsythia, P. micra and F. nucleatum) via qPCR. Relative gene abundance is expressed as the proportion of target bacterial 16s rRNA gene copies relative to the total bacterial 16s rRNA gene copies per mL. The measure reports the actual proportion at baseline and at day 7.

    Time frame: baseline (day 0) and day 7

  4. Changes in the Relative Abundance of T. Forsythia

    Evaluation of pathogen suppression by quantifying the relative gene abundance of periodontal-disease-associated taxa (e.x. P. gingivalis, T. forsythia, P. micra and F. nucleatum) via qPCR. Relative gene abundance is expressed as the proportion of target bacterial 16s rRNA gene copies relative to the total bacterial 16s rRNA gene copies per mL. The measure reports the actual proportion at baseline and at day 7.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 0) and day 7

  5. Changes in the Relative Abundance of P. Micra

    Evaluation of pathogen suppression by quantifying the relative gene abundance of periodontal-disease-associated taxa (e.x. P. gingivalis, T. forsythia, P. micra and F. nucleatum) via qPCR. Relative gene abundance is expressed as the proportion of target bacterial 16s rRNA gene copies relative to the total bacterial 16s rRNA gene copies per mL. The measure reports the actual proportion at baseline and at day 7.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 0) and day 7

  6. Changes in the Relative Abundance of F. Nucleatum

    Evaluation of pathogen suppression by quantifying the relative gene abundance of periodontal-disease-associated taxa (e.x. P. gingivalis, T. forsythia, P. micra and F. nucleatum) via qPCR. Relative gene abundance is expressed as the proportion of target bacterial 16s rRNA gene copies relative to the total bacterial 16s rRNA gene copies per mL. The measure reports the actual proportion at baseline and at day 7.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 0) and day 7

07

Results

Posted Jun 16, 2026
Limitations and caveats
This was a short Phase 0 study meant to validate the dosage form.

Participant flow

8 volunteers were enrolled.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneReceives Probiotic Lozenge
Started8
Completed8
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Oral Inflammatory Load (OIL)

Oral inflammatory load (OIL) is measured via oral neutrophil count in oral rinse samples (oPMN). Post-transplantation values (Day 7) are normalized to each participant's baseline (Day 0) value to evaluate the change in OIL. For normalization, each participant's baseline OIL was set to 1 by dividing the baseline neutrophil count by itself. Post-transplantation OIL values were then divided by the participants baseline to calculate fold change.

Time frame:
Baseline (day 0) and day 7
Reported as:
Mean · fold change
Change in Oral Inflammatory Load (OIL)
fold changeReceives Probiotic Lozenge
baseline1 ± 0
day 70.573 ± 0.087
Statistical analysis
  • Receives Probiotic Lozenge · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.0312 · Mean difference (final values): -0.427 · 95% CI -0.639 to -0.215
PrimaryChange in SALI-10 Colonization Levels

Quantification of SALI-10 colonization using qPCR targeting the srnA2 gene. Samples were collected at baseline (Day 0) and post-transplantation (Day 7). The srnA2 gene encodes for phosphorylated lantibiotic synthesized by S.salivarius SALI-10

Time frame:
Baseline (day 0) and day 7
Reported as:
Mean · log10(copies/mL)
Change in SALI-10 Colonization Levels
log10(copies/mL)Receives Probiotic Lozenge
baseline0.829 ± 0.566
Day 73.344 ± 0.377
Statistical analysis
  • Receives Probiotic Lozenge · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.0078 · Mean difference (final values): 2.391 · 95% CI 1.410 to 3.372
PrimaryChanges in the Relative Abundance of P. Gingivalis

Evaluation of pathogen suppression by quantifying the relative gene abundance of periodontal-disease-associated taxa (e.x. P. gingivalis, T. forsythia, P. micra and F. nucleatum) via qPCR. Relative gene abundance is expressed as the proportion of target bacterial 16s rRNA gene copies relative to the total bacterial 16s rRNA gene copies per mL. The measure reports the actual proportion at baseline and at day 7.

Time frame:
baseline (day 0) and day 7
Reported as:
Mean · Proportion of P. gingivalis gene copies
Changes in the Relative Abundance of P. Gingivalis
Proportion of P. gingivalis gene copiesReceives Probiotic Lozenge
baseline P. gingivalis0.420 ± 0.028
day 7 P. gingivalis0.362 ± 0.028
Statistical analysis
  • Receives Probiotic Lozenge · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.0156 · Mean difference (final values): -0.0579 · 95% CI -0.0886 to -0.0272
PrimaryChanges in the Relative Abundance of T. Forsythia

Evaluation of pathogen suppression by quantifying the relative gene abundance of periodontal-disease-associated taxa (e.x. P. gingivalis, T. forsythia, P. micra and F. nucleatum) via qPCR. Relative gene abundance is expressed as the proportion of target bacterial 16s rRNA gene copies relative to the total bacterial 16s rRNA gene copies per mL. The measure reports the actual proportion at baseline and at day 7.

Time frame:
Baseline (day 0) and day 7
Reported as:
Mean · Proportion of T. forsythia gene copies
Changes in the Relative Abundance of T. Forsythia
Proportion of T. forsythia gene copiesReceives Probiotic Lozenge
baseline T. forsythia0.445 ± 0.034
day 7 T. forsythia0.382 ± 0.036
Statistical analysis
  • Receives Probiotic Lozenge · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.0078 · Mean difference (final values): -0.0693 · 95% CI -0.0951 to -0.0435
PrimaryChanges in the Relative Abundance of P. Micra

Evaluation of pathogen suppression by quantifying the relative gene abundance of periodontal-disease-associated taxa (e.x. P. gingivalis, T. forsythia, P. micra and F. nucleatum) via qPCR. Relative gene abundance is expressed as the proportion of target bacterial 16s rRNA gene copies relative to the total bacterial 16s rRNA gene copies per mL. The measure reports the actual proportion at baseline and at day 7.

Time frame:
Baseline (day 0) and day 7
Reported as:
Mean · Proportion of P. micra gene copies
Changes in the Relative Abundance of P. Micra
Proportion of P. micra gene copiesReceives Probiotic Lozenge
baseline P. micra0.532 ± 0.025
day 7 P. micra0.395 ± 0.029
Statistical analysis
  • Receives Probiotic Lozenge · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.0078 · Mean difference (final values): -0.0808 · 95% CI -0.1122 to -0.0494
PrimaryChanges in the Relative Abundance of F. Nucleatum

Evaluation of pathogen suppression by quantifying the relative gene abundance of periodontal-disease-associated taxa (e.x. P. gingivalis, T. forsythia, P. micra and F. nucleatum) via qPCR. Relative gene abundance is expressed as the proportion of target bacterial 16s rRNA gene copies relative to the total bacterial 16s rRNA gene copies per mL. The measure reports the actual proportion at baseline and at day 7.

Time frame:
Baseline (day 0) and day 7
Reported as:
Mean · Proportion of F. nucleatum gene copies
Changes in the Relative Abundance of F. Nucleatum
Proportion of F. nucleatum gene copiesReceives Probiotic Lozenge
baseline F. nucleatum0.666 ± 0.03
day 7 F. nucleatum0.595 ± 0.043
Statistical analysis
  • Receives Probiotic Lozenge · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.0234 · Mean difference (final values): -0.0704 · 95% CI -0.1141 to -0.0267

Adverse events

Collected over From enrollment to Completion (Day 7). Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Receives Probiotic Lozenge0/8 (0%)0/8 (0%)0/8 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Receives Probiotic Lozenge
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years8
>=65 years0
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Receives Probiotic Lozenge
Female4
Male4
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Receives Probiotic Lozenge
SALI-10 colonization levels at baseline
SALI-10 colonization levels at baseline(log10(copies/mL))Receives Probiotic Lozenge
Mean0.8287 ± 1.6001
Relative abundance of P. gingivalis at baseline
Relative abundance of P. gingivalis at baseline(relative abundance (proportion))Receives Probiotic Lozenge
Mean0.4195 ± 0.0767
Relative abundance of T. forsythia at baseline
Relative abundance of T. forsythia at baseline(relative abundance (proportion))Receives Probiotic Lozenge
Mean0.4454 ± 0.1006
Relative abundance of P. micra at baseline
Relative abundance of P. micra at baseline(relative abundance (proportion))Receives Probiotic Lozenge
Mean0.5323 ± 0.0695
Relative abundance of F. nucleatum at baseline
Relative abundance of F. nucleatum at baseline(relative abundance (proportion))Receives Probiotic Lozenge
Mean0.6655 ± 0.0911
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Ostia Sciences Inc
    Toronto, Ontario M5G 1G6, Canada
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Wellappuli NC, Fine N, Lawrence HP, Goldberg M, Tenenbaum HC, Glogauer M. Oral and Blood Neutrophil Activation States during Experimental Gingivitis. JDR Clin Trans Res. 2018 Jan;3(1):65-75. doi: 10.1177/2380084417742120. Epub 2017 Nov 20. PubMed 30938653 ↗
  • van der Weijden F, Slot DE. Oral hygiene in the prevention of periodontal diseases: the evidence. Periodontol 2000. 2011 Feb;55(1):104-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2009.00337.x. No abstract available. PubMed 21134231 ↗
  • LOE H, THEILADE E, JENSEN SB. EXPERIMENTAL GINGIVITIS IN MAN. J Periodontol (1930). 1965 May-Jun;36:177-87. doi: 10.1902/jop.1965.36.3.177. No abstract available. PubMed 14296927 ↗
  • Kerns KA, Bamashmous S, Hendrickson EL, Kotsakis GA, Leroux BG, Daubert DD, Roberts FA, Chen D, Trivedi HM, Darveau RP, McLean JS. Localized microbially induced inflammation influences distant healthy tissues in the human oral cavity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Oct 10;120(41):e2306020120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2306020120. Epub 2023 Oct 2. PubMed 37782795 ↗
  • Gunsolley JC. A meta-analysis of six-month studies of antiplaque and antigingivitis agents. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006 Dec;137(12):1649-57. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0110. PubMed 17138709 ↗
  • Gallagher H, Ramsay SC, Barnes J, Maggs J, Cassidy N, Ketheesan N. Neutrophil labeling with [(99m)Tc]-technetium stannous colloid is complement receptor 3-mediated and increases the neutrophil priming response to lipopolysaccharide. Nucl Med Biol. 2006 Apr;33(3):433-9. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2005.12.014. Epub 2006 Mar 9. PubMed 16631093 ↗
  • Berezow AB, Darveau RP. Microbial shift and periodontitis. Periodontol 2000. 2011 Feb;55(1):36-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2010.00350.x. No abstract available. PubMed 21134227 ↗
  • Barbour A, Wescombe P, Smith L. Evolution of Lantibiotic Salivaricins: New Weapons to Fight Infectious Diseases. Trends Microbiol. 2020 Jul;28(7):578-593. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2020.03.001. Epub 2020 Apr 6. PubMed 32544444 ↗
  • Barbour A, Philip K. Variable characteristics of bacteriocin-producing Streptococcus salivarius strains isolated from Malaysian subjects. PLoS One. 2014 Jun 18;9(6):e100541. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100541. eCollection 2014. PubMed 24941127 ↗
  • Albandar JM, Rams TE. Global epidemiology of periodontal diseases: an overview. Periodontol 2000. 2002;29:7-10. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0757.2002.290101.x. No abstract available. PubMed 12102700 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol, analysis plan and consent form · Oct 12, 2025

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — This is a Phase 0 trial, and no individual participant data will be kept.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 16, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06819761
Lead sponsor
Ostia Sciences
Responsible party
Michael Glogauer (Principal Investigator, Ostia Sciences) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 11, 2025
Start date
Mar 6, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 15, 2025
Completion
Jun 30, 2025
Results posted
Jun 16, 2026
Last update
Jun 16, 2026

Study contacts

Michael Glogauger, MD
principal investigator · Ostia Sciences Inc

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion