CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06817317Updated Feb 10, 2025

The Effect of Two Different Learning Methods on Disaster Perception and Management in Nursing Students

An interventional study of Model Based Training and Peer and Self-Learning Group in Students, Nursing and Learning Techniques, sponsored by Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-10.

Sponsored by Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 8 months after the study started (first participant enrolled May 2024, registered Feb 2025).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
64
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study was planned to evaluate the effect of two different learning methods on the perception of disaster preparedness and competences related to disaster management in nursing students.

Read the detailed description

Disasters are an important public health problem due to their unpredictable duration, disruptions in society and health services, loss of life and property, significant economic losses, deterioration in psycho-social welfare and their effects in subsequent periods. Disaster events are events that exceed the local response capacity, where existing resources are insufficient in demand and require external assistance at international level. Therefore, disasters should be addressed not only in terms of their devastating effects but also in terms of the appropriate preparedness of the available resources in the community. Especially in the event of a disaster, it is certain that the demand for life-threatening medical care will increase, and the presence of timely accessible, equipped and prepared health workers is very important in disaster response.

Considering the increasing frequency of disasters and large-scale public health emergencies, this situation makes the disaster-related aspects of nursing particularly important. Nurses can serve as first responders, direct health care providers, point of care coordinators, information sources, educators and counsellors in disaster areas. However, most nurses and nursing students are not properly prepared for disaster situations.

Many disaster nursing education programmes are offered as themes within existing courses (health protection and promotion, public health and emergency nursing courses) through elective courses, seminars and conferences. As in many other areas of undergraduate nursing education, disaster education often adopts traditional instructor-centred teaching methods. According to the students' point of view, this teaching strategy has a monotonous and boring structure and may negatively affect the students' willingness to learn by shortening their attention span.

Simulation and scenario-based disaster nursing education programmes using standardised patients can be useful in disaster nursing education by improving students' skills and preparation. In case of disaster, models allow nurses to provide better service and performance.

In addition, peer-assisted and self-directed learning method content and teaching strategies aim to improve students' autonomy by incorporating students' feedback and comments into the design of the course. Student-centred education can consist of a variety of teaching tools and techniques, online audio-visual materials, activities, games and storytelling that reflect students' preferences. The student-centred education approach plays an important role in supporting the public health infrastructure and is receiving increasing attention in studies related to disaster preparedness and response.

In this study, it is aimed to evaluate the effect of two different learning methods on the perception of disaster preparedness and competencies related to disaster management in nursing students.

02

Conditions studied

  • Students, Nursing
  • Learning Techniques

Keywords

  • peer education
  • self learning
  • model based training
  • disaster preparedness
  • disaster management
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University is the lead sponsor of 96 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 years of age or older Active student registration in the system between the specified dates Accepted to participate in the study verbally and in writing after being informed Who have not received training on disaster management before General health status (systemic, consciousness, sensation) is suitable for the research process

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having theoretical/practical training on disaster management Non-volunteering
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
64 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention Group 1

    In this study, 'Disaster Nursing' course is an elective course integrated into the nursing curriculum. Disaster nursing course content to be applied to the Model based training group; the topics related to pre-disaster, disaster, post-disaster and recovery phases were prepared in line with International Nurses Association (ICN) Basic Competence Areas in Disaster Nursing, General Directorate of Emergency Health Services First Aid Training Guide and Jenning's Disaster Management Model in Nursing. One day a week for 5 weeks, the theoretical part 100 minutes (transferred by the academic staff responsible for the course), laboratory 50 minutes (transferred by theNational Medical Rescue Team personnel). There are 20 students in this group. Data were collected through data collection tools at pre-intervention, 5-week post-intervention, 1st month follow-up, 3rd month follow-up and 6th month follow-up stages.

    Other: Model Based Training

  • Experimental
    Intervention Group 2

    In this study, peer and self-learning group consisted of four different seminar groups of five students randomised. The students were informed about creating a seminar programme on disaster nursing and management and making presentations until the dates determined at the beginning of the semester. It was explained that they would use peer and self-learning methods in seminar preparation and that the researchers would not intervene in the techniques they would create. Four different seminar groups were formed. There are 5 students in each group. Each group prepares a seminar on disaster nursing and management by using peer and self-learning methods. There are 20 students in this group. For 4 weeks, the groups made seminar presentations for 150 minutes one day a week. All seminar groups came together in the last week and formed a group discussion on disaster nursing research and development activities.

    Other: Peer and Self-Learning Group

  • No intervention
    Control Group

    It consists of students who are not included in the intervention groups. The control group continues the education process in the routine education programme. This group consists of 24 students.

Interventions

  • OtherModel Based Training

    experimental group

  • OtherPeer and Self-Learning Group

    experimental group

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Introductory information form

    The form, which was created by the researchers within the scope of the literature, includes 12 questions including socio-demographic characteristics, disaster experience, experience, and disaster-related information sources.

    Time frame: All groups were administered a pre-test before the intervention, a post-test at the end of the 5-week intervention, a 1-month follow-up, a 3-month follow-up and a 6-month follow-up.

  2. Nurses' Perception of Disaster Preparedness Scale

    This scale was developed by Feride Özcan in 2013 to measure how prepared nurses feel themselves against disasters. The scale consists of 20 items and 3 sub-dimensions as Preparation Phase (Questions 1-6), Intervention Phase (Questions 7-15), Post-Disaster Phase (Questions 16-20). The items of the scale are scored in five-point Likert type (1-Strongly disagree, 2-Disagree, 3-Somewhat agree, 4-Agree, 5-Strongly agree). As the score obtained from the scale increases, the perception of disaster preparedness also increases.

    Time frame: Pre-test before intervention, post-test at the end of 5-week intervention, 1-month follow-up, 3-month follow-up and 6-month follow-up stages were applied to all groups.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Nurses' Competence Assessment Scale for Disaster Management

    The scale developed by Yıldız Keskin (2023) to evaluate the competences of nurses regarding disaster management consists of 43 items in two dimensions (disaster preparedness and disaster response). The items of the scale are scored in five-point Likert type (1-Strongly disagree, 2-Disagree, 3-Somewhat agree, 4-Agree, 5-Strongly agree).

    Time frame: Pre-test before intervention, post-test at the end of 5-week intervention, 1-month follow-up, 3-month follow-up and 6-month follow-up stages were applied to all groups.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University
    Zonguldak, Turkey
08

References and documents

Related links

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — I want to share my research protocol after one year.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 10, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06817317
Lead sponsor
Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University
Responsible party
Enise Sürücü (Dr., Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 10, 2025
Start date
May 10, 2024
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2024
Completion
Dec 30, 2024
Last update
Feb 10, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion